Microfiche records prior to 2006 have not been completely digitized and may not be available yet on PRO. If you cannot find what you are looking for please submit a records request.

Permit Review Detail

Permit Number: T09CM01571
Parcel: 11807003D

Review Status: Completed

Review Details: COMMERCIAL NEW

Permit Number - T09CM01571
Review Name: COMMERCIAL NEW
Review Status: Completed
Review Date Reviewer's Name Type of Review Description Status Comments
06/18/2009 JOHN WILLIAMS COMMERCIAL IMPACT FEE COMMERCIAL IMPACT FEE PROCESSING Completed Impact Fee's Do Apply; Central District; 3,360 Square Foot Restaurant; $15,250.64
06/18/2009 TERRY STEVENS ZONING REVIEW Approved
06/19/2009 MARTIN BROWN FIRE REVIEW Denied Please provide occupant load analysis.
06/22/2009 RONALD BROWN ZONING HC SITE REVIEW Denied REFERENCE BUILDING REVIEW COMMENTS
06/23/2009 RONALD BROWN BUILDING-COMMERCIAL REVIEW Denied 1. With an occupancy load of 96, two exits are required as per section 1015.1. As per section 1014.2.2, exit egress may not pass through kitchens. Please redesign the rear exit so as not exiting throught the kitchen.
2. Please provide structural calculations for all hvac unit located on the roof.
3. Please redesign Customer Service Counter to comply with ICC/ANSI 117.1, Section 904.
4. Please provide separate, large scale partialtoilet plans showing all pertinant dimensions for accessibility compliance including all accessories and clearance and manuvering spaces required.
5. Code requirements for the back building roof drainage system, do not allow for the overflow system to be the same as the main roof drainage down spout system. They must be separate. Reference mechanuical comments.
6. As per structural notes, sheet S-2, there are more special inspections required than those provided on the required special inspection forms. Please provide special inspection forms for steel frames, high strength bolts and soils.
7. STRUCTURAL CALCULATIONS (PAGE 1): SOIL CRITERIA REFERENCED TO GEOTECHNICAL REPORT. INCLUDE THAT REPORT FOR PLAN REVIEW.
8. SHEET S1 (FOUNDATION PLAN); CALCULATIONS (PAGE 4): IT APPEARS THE SIDEWALL AND ENDWALL COLUMN FOOTINGS DIFFER BETWEEN THE CALCULATIONS AND THE PLANS. VERIFY.
9. SHEET S1 (FOUNDATION PLAN): PROVIDE FOUNDATION CALCULATIONS FOR THE COLUMNS ON GRID 4.
10. STRUCTURAL CALCULATIONS: PROVIDE CALCULATIONS FOR THE CMU WAINSCOT WALL.
11. BUTLER BUILDING DRAWING 01; SHEET S1: THE PORTAL FRAMES INDICATED ON THE BUTLER DRAWINGS ARE NOT SHOWN ON THE STRUCTURAL DRAWINGS (ALONG WITH FOUNDATIONS). CLARIFY.
12. PROVIDE WRITTEN RESPONSES TO ALL COMMENTS CONTAINED IN THIS REVIEW.

END OF REVIEW
06/30/2009 GERRY KOZIOL WWM REVIEW Denied need manhole construction permit -review & approval 3rd floor PCWRD-Roy Montoya 740-6369
07/02/2009 ROBERT SHERRY MECHANICAL-COMMERCIAL REVIEW Denied 1. Revise air handler and duct connection detail and the notes on sheet M3 to reference the 2006 International Mechanical Code with Local Amendments, not the 2003 International Mechanical Code.
2. Revise the energy code analysis, coordinating the building components used in the analysis with those shown on the drawing. (e.g., the drawing shows larger glass areas, including entrance doors; there are no wood-framed walls; most of the walls are framed at 24" on center; and the roof does not have continuous insulation) Reference: Section 302.2, IECC 2006, as amended by the City of Tucson.
3. Show the location of the make up air unit on the mechanical plans. Reference: Section 106.3.1, IMC 2006.
4. Clarify which exhaust fans serve which kitchen hoods (see the exhaust hood and equipment list. Reference: Section 106.3.1, IMC 2006.
5. Provide the duct sizes for the make up air unit. Reference: Section 106.3.1, IMC 2006.
6. Provide the installed weight of the rooftop equipment. Provide structural calculations to verify that the existing roof is capable of supporting the additional dead load due to the installation of the roof top equipment. Reference: Sections 106.3.1 and 302.1, IMC 2006.
7. Show how the fan coils are being connected to the building structure and provide calculations to show that the building structure is not being adversely affected. Reference: Section 302.1, IMC 2006.
8. Show the size, route, and termination point for each of the overflow condensate drains for the air handlers. Reference: Section 307.2.3, IMC 2006, as amended by the City of Tucson.
9. Show that a separation of at least ten feet exists between air intake openings and exhaust openings. Reference: 401.4.1, IMC 2006.
10. Air conditioning supply air is continuously introduced into the restrooms whereas the restroom exhaust fans are switched with the lights. This will result in recirculation of the air from the restroom whenever the lights are turned off. Complete recirculation of ventilation air from toilet rooms is prohibited. Reference: Section 403.2.1 (3), IMC 2006.
11. Justify the occupant load used to calculate the required ventilation for the dining area. The occupant load used for calculating the minimum required ventilation is to be based on Table 403.3, IMC 2003 or an approved engineering analysis of the specific occupancy type. Reference: Section 403.3, IMC 2006.
12. Provide calculations to show that the common ventilation system is sized in accordance with Section 403.3.2, IMC 2006.
13. Provide the size of the grease ducts to show that a minimum velocity of 1500 feet per minute is being attained. Reference: Sections 106.3.1 and 506.3.4, IMC 2006, as amended by the City of Tucson.
14. Provide information to show that the proposed grease duct insulation system complies with ASTM E 2336. Reference: Section 506.3.10 (1), IMC 2006.
15. Provide structural calculations and details to show that the Type I hoods are supported from the building structure in accordance with Section 507.6, IMC 2006. Reference: Section 302.1, IMC 2006.
16. Provide information to show that the operation of the Type I hoods and the hood exhaust fans complies with Section 507.2.1.1, IMC 2006.
17. Clarify how the make up air flow and the kitchen exhaust flows are balanced. Reference: Section 508.1, IMC 2006.
18. Provide information to show that the operation of the make up air unit and the hood exhaust fans complies with Section 508.1, IMC 2006.
19. Show that the materials exposed in the make up air plenum (e.g. electrical components, etc.), conform to the requirements of Section 602.2.1, IMC 2006.
20. Smoke detectors shall be located upstream of any outside air connections. Reference: Section 606.2.1, IMC 2006.
07/02/2009 RICK MYERS PLUMBING-COMMERCIAL REVIEW Denied 1. Note number 17 of the Private Sewer Notes state that a backwater valve is required. Show the location of the backwater valve.
2. Provide backflow protection at irrigation stub, and at future mister stubs.
3. Show the location of the RPPBP on the yard water piping.
4. Show the size, type, and location of the backflow preventers for the soda machine, ice maker, etc.
5. Correct the piping size on the overhead water piping at the one inch split. It should be a 1"x3/4"x1" tee. You show the branch reducing to 3/4" and then increasing back to 1".
6. Include how the water system is to be sterilized. Reference: 609.9 2006 UPC.
7. The three compartment sink is to be directly connected to the sanitary sewer. One compartment may be indirectly wasted if it is a sanitizing bowl or a prep bowl.
8. Provide hammer arrestors at the washer box. Reference: 609.10, 2006 UPC.
9. Show the calculations for the size of the scuppers, and the overflows for the roof drains.
10. Clarify the existence of fixture 5A.
11. Clarify the size of the traps and trap arms for the floor sinks.
12. Calculate the water demand using the fixture units shown in Tables 6-5 or A-2 (for Assembly occupancies) Reference: Section 610.3, UPC 2006.
07/02/2009 RMYERS1 WATER REVIEW Denied 1. Provide location of backflow preventer on yardwater piping. 2. Provide location of backflow device for irrigation.
07/09/2009 RAY MAJUTA ELECTRICAL-COMMERCIAL REVIEW Denied Project;1465 W Silverlake Rd
T09CM01571
New Lucky Wishbone Restaurant


The Electrical Plans have been denied for the following;

1. Sheet E-5, one line diagram shows 2 sets of 4-500 MCM
Alum feeders rated at 620 amps total under the 75-C column,the total load calculations indicates 665.7 amps of load ?
2. Circuit L1-31 is shown on the power plan and not on the panel schedule.
3. Circuit L1-18,20,22 shown on power plan going to UC-1, however on the panel schedule marked as spares.
4. Circuit -24 on power plan shown as a receptacle for EC-1, on the panel schedule marked as CO2 system ?
5. Circuit L-33 on power plan shown as an outside receptacle (GFI) for equipment , marked in panel schedule as soda fountain.
6.Circuit P2- 7,11,13 on power plan shown going to HP-2 , shown on panel schedule as Production Fryer.
7.Kitchen Equipment Schedule shows item 10 on P2-14,16,18, future, in power plan , however in panel schedule the listing is for Walk in Freezer UC-2.
8.In P2 Panel Schedule circuit 31 is not marked on power plan.
9.In P2 Panel Schedule circuit 32 is not marked on power plan.
10.Mark circuits P1-19,21,23 on power plan as indicated on panel schedule.
11.Mark L1-5 on power plan as indicated on panel schedule.


Ray T Majuta,
PDS City of Tucson
Electrical Plan Check
520-837-4988
Ray.Majuta@tucsonaz.gov
7/10/09
07/10/2009 LOREN MAKUS ENGINEERING REVIEW Approved July 13, 2009 (Special Inspection Required)

The applicant is authorized to use a portion of the flood hazard area (FEMA Zone AE, FIRM 04019C2228 K) ) in the City of Tucson, Arizona, on the property described as 1465 West Silverlake Road for the purpose of constructing a new single restaurant along with associated site and right of way improvements.

The applicant agrees to comply with City of Tucson Floodplain and Erosion Hazard regulations, and are particularly bound by the conditions stated below. Violation of any of the conditions stated or referred to below, as determined by the City Engineer, shall be grounds for revocation of this permit. Responsibility for renewal of this permit, if necessary, is with the applicant. Issuance of this permit does not constitute a waiver of other requirements contained in the Tucson City Code, Land Use Code, or any other Federal, State, or local regulation. No use other than as permitted herein is allowed. Additional uses allowed under City of Tucson Floodplain and Erosion Hazard Regulations and Watercourse Amenities, Safety, and Habitat regulations require the issuance of an additional Floodplain Use Permit.

The following conditions shall apply to this permit.

1. All work shall conform to the improvement plans submitted as Activity Numbers T07BU02194 and T09CM01571 which are made part of this permit.
2. The lowest finished floor and all associated facilities of the buildings in the property under this permit shall be placed a minimum of 2379.7 feet above mean sea level, NAVD 1988 (as determined from the Drainage Report ), as Certified by a Registered Land Surveyor. This certification shall be completed and submitted before the slab is poured and again when the house is ready for final inspection. The certification must be completed and returned to the Development Services Dept., Engineering Section on the 1st. Floor of the County/City Public Works Building at 201 N. Stone Avenue.
From the FIRM the base flood elevation is 2376 feet NGVD 1929.
3. Except as approved by the City Engineer prior to the start of construction, development under this permit shall not obstruct, retard or divert the existing flow of floodwaters from or to adjacent properties.
4. Any additional development including construction of walls or fences will require separate floodplain use permits
5. This permit becomes invalid and is subject to additional floodplain review, if any required development permit(s') changes the configuration of the structure and or site development.

This Floodplain Use Permit will be automatically revoked and becomes invalid for non-compliance to conditions set forth in this permit.

Note: Final inspection or certificate of occupancy will be on hold until the Elevation Certificate is completed and returned to our office.

The applicant is authorized by the City Engineer to receive a floodplain use permit subject to the above referenced conditions and restrictions.

Final Status

Task End Date Reviewer's Name Type of Review Description
08/05/2009 CPIERCE1 OUT TO CUSTOMER Completed
08/05/2009 SUE REEVES REJECT SHELF Completed