Microfiche records prior to 2006 have not been completely digitized and may not be available yet on PRO. If you cannot find what you are looking for please submit a records request.

Permit Review Detail

Permit Number: T09CM01465
Parcel: 12706012A

Review Status: Completed

Review Details: RESUBMITTAL

Permit Number - T09CM01465
Review Name: RESUBMITTAL
Review Status: Completed
Review Date Reviewer's Name Type of Review Description Status Comments
08/06/2009 ERIC NEWCOMB BUILDING-COMMERCIAL REVIEW Denied 1. PREVIOUS COMMENT 1: THE ARCHITECT OF RECORD IS RESPONSIBLE FOR ESTABLISHING THE BUILDING OCCUPANCY GROUP AND OCCUPANT LOAD. YOU ESTABLISHED THE 60 TOTAL OCCUPANT LOAD, AND THUS THE EXITING REQUIREMENTS WERE NOT MET ACCORDING TO THE IBC. THE OCCUPANT LOAD FOR A BUSINESS IS 100SF/PERSON, FOR A TOTAL OCCUPANT LOAD OF 31 FOR THIS PROJECT.
2. PREVIOUS COMMENT 3: CONNECTION DETAILS OF THE HOOD, FANS, AND MAKE-UP AIR UNIT TO THE STRUCTURAL FRAMING MEMBERS WERE NOT INCLUDED FOR THIS REVIEW. PROVIDE.
3. GENERAL: PROVIDE WRITTEN RESPONSES TO THESE REVIEW COMMENTS.
08/07/2009 ERIC NEWCOMB ZONING HC SITE REVIEW Approved
08/14/2009 ROBERT SHERRY MECHANICAL-COMMERCIAL REVIEW Denied 1. Comment not resolved. Clarify which make up air unit is being installed with this activity. The mechanical drawings indicate a standard evaporative cooler (300 Lb.) whereas the submitted shop drawings show a filtered-air evaporative cooler (514 Lb.) Reference: Sections 106.3.1 and 302.1, IMC 2006.
2. Comment not addressed. Provide sufficient detail on the drawings to allow evaluation of the energy compliance of the building envelope. The information shall, as a minimum, include U-factors and SHGC for the glazing components, along with the R-values of the envelope insulation. The same information should be included with the submitted calculations but the information must be shown on the drawings. Reference: Section 104.2, IECC 2006.
3. Comment not addressed. Provide supporting documentation for the U-factors used for the roof construction labeled as "other". Reference: Section 104.2, IECC 2006.
4. Comment not addressed. Provide supporting documentation for the U-factor of the roll-up door and of the metal door. Reference: Section 104.2, IECC 2006.
5. Comment not addressed. Provide supporting documentation for the assembly U-factors and SHGC for the window walls and glass doors. Reference: Section 104.2, IECC 2006.
6. Comment not addressed. Clarify how the standing seam roof has continuous insulation; the building cross section appears to show cavity insulation. Reference: Section 104.2, IECC 2006.
7. Comment not addressed. This building is for "dining: cafeteria/fast food", not "dining: family" the difference affects the budget watts/square meter. Reference: Section 104.2, IECC 2006.
8. Comment not resolved. If ASHRAE 62.1-2004 is being used for determining the ventilation for a multiple-zone area, the calculations noted in Section 6.2.5, ASHRAE 62.1-2004 shall be used to determine the outdoor intake flow. Reference: Section 403.3, IMC 2006, as amended by the City of Tucson.
9. Comment not addressed. Provide the mechanical energy code calculations. Reference: Section 101.4, International Energy Conservation Code 2006.
10. Comment not addressed. Provide listing information for the specific clothes dryer being installed to show that the proposed 3-1/2" x 10" dryer exhaust duct is sized per the dryer manufacturer's requirements. Reference: Sections 304.1 and 504.6, IMC 2006.

Final Status

Task End Date Reviewer's Name Type of Review Description
08/25/2009 CPIERCE1 OUT TO CUSTOMER Completed
08/25/2009 SUE REEVES REJECT SHELF Completed