Microfiche records prior to 2006 have not been completely digitized and may not be available yet on PRO. If you can not find what you are looking for please submit a records request.
Permit Review Detail
Review Status: Completed
Review Details: RESIDENTIAL BLDG/WWM
Permit Number - T09CM01403
Review Name: RESIDENTIAL BLDG/WWM
Review Status: Completed
| Review Date | Reviewer's Name | Type of Review | Description | Status | Comments |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 06/29/2009 | KEN VAN KARSEN | BUILDING-RESIDENTIAL | REVIEW | Passed | |
| 06/29/2009 | ERIC NEWCOMB | BUILDING-COMMERCIAL | REVIEW | Denied | 1. SHEET S1 (ROOF AND WALL DECK); CALCULATIONS: SPECIFICATIONS IN THE CALCULATIONS DIFFER FROM THE PROPERTIES LISTED ON S1, INCLUDING Fy, Ix, AND Sx. CLARIFY. 2. SHEET S1; ELEVATIONS: IS THE NORTH ARROW ON THE FOUNDATION PLAN CORRECT? COORDINATE WITH THE ELEVATIONS. 3. SHEET S1: INDICATE ON THE ELEVATION WHICH HEADER TO USE OVER EACH WALL OPENING. THE CALCULATIONS REFER TO A TS4X4X3/16 OVER THE GARAGE DOOR, BUT THIS IS NOT INDICATED ON THE APPROPRIATE ELEVATION. CLARIFY. 4. SHEET S2 (DETAIL 9); SHEET S1 (ELEVATION): INDICATE DETAIL 9/S2 ON THE APPROPRIATE ELEVATION. 5. SHEET S2 (DETAIL 2); CALCULATIONS: THE CALCULATIONS DESIGN FOR A CONTINUOUS FOOTING INDICATES 12" WIDTH, 18" DEPTH, WHILE DETAIL 2 INDICATES 6" WIDTH AND VARIABLE DEPTH. COORDINATE. THE FOOTING MUST EXTEND A MINIMUM OF 18" BELOW FINISH GRADE PER THE CITY OF TUCSON AMENDMENT TO THE IBC SECTION 1805.2 IN ORDER TO USE 1500 PSF SOIL BEARING. SHOW THIS ON THE DETAIL. 6. SHEET S2 (DETAIL 1); CALCULATIONS: THE CALCULATIONS INDICATE A 2' X 2' FOOTING AT THE COLUMNS, WHILE THE DETAIL INDICATES A 2'-0" DIAMETER FOOTING. CLARIFY. 7. PROVIDE WRITTEN RESPONSES TO ALL COMMENTS MADE IN THIS REVIEW. |
Final Status
| Task End Date | Reviewer's Name | Type of Review | Description |
|---|---|---|---|
| 07/09/2009 | CPIERCE1 | OUT TO CUSTOMER | Completed |
| 07/09/2009 | FFIGUER1 | REJECT SHELF | Completed |