Microfiche records prior to 2006 have not been completely digitized and may not be available yet on PRO. If you cannot find what you are looking for please submit a records request.

Permit Review Detail

Permit Number: T09CM01402
Parcel: 209170040

Review Status: Completed

Review Details: COMMERCIAL NEW

Permit Number - T09CM01402
Review Name: COMMERCIAL NEW
Review Status: Completed
Review Date Reviewer's Name Type of Review Description Status Comments
06/05/2009 DAVE MANN FIRE REVIEW Approv-Cond Fire sprinklers required in all H occupancies (2006 IFC, section 903.2.4)
06/05/2009 GERRY KOZIOL WWM REVIEW Passed
06/05/2009 JOHN WILLIAMS COMMERCIAL IMPACT FEE COMMERCIAL IMPACT FEE PROCESSING Passed
06/09/2009 ERIC NEWCOMB BUILDING-COMMERCIAL REVIEW Denied 1. SHEET 17; FOUNDATION GENERAL STRUCTURAL NOTES: NOTE 1 INDICATES A GEOTECHNICAL EVALUATION REPORT. PROVIDE FOR REVIEW.
2. SHEET 17 (FOUNDATION GENERAL STRUCTURAL NOTES); CALCULATIONS PAGE 1: THE CALCULATIONS REFERENCE A GEOTECHNICAL REPORT THAT IS DIFFERENT FROM THAT LISTED ON THE DRAWINGS. CLARIFY AND PROVIDE REPORT.
3. SHEET 19; DETAIL 7: IF THE STEEL COLUMN IS CENTERED ON THE 12" CONCRETE WALL AND ON THE 7" BASE PLATE, THE 1" DIMENSION FROM THE EXTERIOR FACE OF THE STEM WALL IS INCORRECT. VERIFY.
4. CALCULATIONS: THE ACTUAL DESIGN OF THE BUILDING FOUNDATION WAS NOT FOUND IN THE CALCULATIONS. VERIFY AND PROVIDE.
5. SHEET 18 (DETAIL 5); CALCULATIONS: THE ACTUAL DESIGN OF THE CONTAINMENT WALL WAS NOT FOUND IN THE CALCULATIONS. VERIFY AND PROVIDE.
6. SHEET 18; DETAIL 9: A GUARDRAIL IS ONLY REQUIRED WHERE THERE IS MINIMUM OF 30" DIFFERENCE IN ELEVATIONS. REVIEW THE IBC SECTION 1012 AND SECTION 1013. REVIEW AND REVISE HANDRAIL HEIGHTS AND EXTENSIONS AS REQUIRED.
7. SHEET 20; KEYNOTE 14: ARE THE STAIR MEMBER SIZES INDICATED ON THE DRAWINGS OR IN THE SPECIFICATIONS? PROVIDE PLANS, DETAILS, AND SPECIFICATIONS AS REQUIRED.
8. GENERAL: PROVIDE WRITTEN RESPONSES TO ALL REVIEW COMMENTS. THIS REVIEW IS PERTINENT ONLY TO PROJECT T09CM01402, THE SODIUM HYPOCHLORITE BUILDING.
06/12/2009 ROBERT SHERRY PLUMBING-COMMERCIAL REVIEW Denied Clarify the drainage design for the building with respect to the floor slope and the capacity to contain a sodium hypochlorite spill along with the water volume from a 24-hour rainfall from a 25-year storm and the design flow from a 20-minute fire extinguishing system. Reference: Sections 2704.2.2.3 and 2704.2.2.6, IFC 2006.
06/12/2009 ROBERT SHERRY MECHANICAL-COMMERCIAL REVIEW Denied Provide calculations to show that the design of the building provides adequate natural ventilation to maintain the level of vapors below the permissible exposure limits or provide mechanical ventilation as called for in Section 502.8.1.1, IMC 2006. Reference: Section 414.3, IBC 2006.
06/12/2009 ROBERT SHERRY WATER REVIEW Denied Provide backflow protection for the potable water distribution system. Reference: Section 27-75 (15), Article V, Chapter XXVII, Tucson Code.
06/22/2009 RAY MAJUTA ELECTRICAL-COMMERCIAL REVIEW Approved
06/22/2009 BIANCA RAMIREZ ENGINEERING REVIEW Approved

Final Status

Task End Date Reviewer's Name Type of Review Description
06/24/2009 CPIERCE1 OUT TO CUSTOMER Completed
06/24/2009 SUE REEVES REJECT SHELF Completed