Microfiche records prior to 2006 have not been completely digitized and may not be available yet on PRO. If you can not find what you are looking for please submit a records request.
Permit Review Detail
Review Status: Completed
Review Details: COMMERCIAL TI
Permit Number - T09CM01377
Review Name: COMMERCIAL TI
Review Status: Completed
| Review Date | Reviewer's Name | Type of Review | Description | Status | Comments |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 06/02/2009 | DAVE MANN | FIRE | REVIEW | Approved | |
| 06/04/2009 | ERIC NEWCOMB | BUILDING-COMMERCIAL | REVIEW | Denied | 1. GENERAL: A MINIMUM OF 3/32" LETTERING IS REQUIRED ON ALL SHEETS (SEE SHEET S1.1). 2. GENERAL: ARE THESE SPACES SPRINKLERED? 3. SHEET A1; SPACES #1, #2, AND #15: PROVIDE EXPLANATION OF HOW IBC CHAPTER 29 PLUMBING REQUIREMENTS ARE SATISFIED BY THE CURRENT PLANS. SPECIFICALLY DRINKING FOUNTAINS AND SERVICE SINKS. 4. SHEET A1; SPACE #1a: THIS IS A SEPARATE LEASE SPACE AND THEREFORE REQUIRES WATER CLOSET/DRINKING FOUNTAIN/SERVICE SINK PER IBC TABLE 2902.1. CLARIFY. 5. SHEET A1; SPACE #15: AN INSURANCE COMPANY FALLS UNDER A 'B' OCCUPANCY TYPE. THIS WOULD CHANGE THE OCCUPANCY TO 10, BUT WOULD NOT CHANGE EXIT OR PLUMBING REQUIREMENTS. VERIFY. 6. SHEET T2 (PLAN 1); SHEET A1 (SPACES #1, #2, AND #15): NOTE ON PLAN 1 INDICATES DOOR SWING MUST NOT IMPEDE CLEAR TURNING RADIUS (DOOR SWINGS OUT OF RESTROOM), BUT ALL RESTROOM PLANS ON A1 INDICATE DOOR SWINGS INTO TURNING RADIUS. CLARIFY OR CHANGE AS REQUIRED. 7. SHEET A3; DETAIL 2: ENLARGED DETAIL AT TOP OF WALL REFERS TO STRUCTURAL FOR SLIP TRACK. PROVIDE. 8. SHEET A3; DETAIL 3: FOR BRACING AT TOP OF WALL, PROVIDE CONNECTION SIZE AND QUANTITY (SPACING) TO TOP OF WALL AND TO STRUCTURE ABOVE. 9. SHEET A3 (DETAIL 2); SHEET S1.1: ARCHITECTURAL DETAIL INDICATES METAL STUD WALL, WHILE STRUCTURAL NOTES ONLY COVER WOOD STUDS. CLARIFY. 10. PROVIDE A LETTER OF RESPONSE TO ALL ITEMS LISTED HERE FOR SUBSEQUENT REVIEW. |
| 06/05/2009 | JOHN WILLIAMS | COMMERCIAL IMPACT FEE | COMMERCIAL IMPACT FEE PROCESSING | Passed | |
| 06/05/2009 | ERIC NEWCOMB | ZONING HC SITE | REVIEW | Denied | 1. SEE BUILDING COMMENTS. |
| 06/08/2009 | GERRY KOZIOL | WWM | REVIEW | Denied | need wastewater 5th floor credit evaluation for removal of 1 toilet & 1 lav per demo drawings |
| 06/15/2009 | ROBERT SHERRY | MECHANICAL-COMMERCIAL | REVIEW | Denied | 1. Provide a copy of the approved drawings for the shell package of the building to establish the existing conditions of the tenant space. Reference: Sections 106.1 and 106.3, IBC 2006. 2. Provide energy code compliance calculations (climate zone for Pima County < 4,000 feet). Provide sufficient detail on the drawings to evaluate the energy compliance of the building envelope and the mechanical system. The information shall, as a minimum, include U-factors of the envelope systems and fenestration components, along with the R-values of the insulation. Reference: Sections 101.4 and 104.2, International Energy Conservation Code 2006. 3. Provide heating and cooling load calculations that justify the capacities of the heating and cooling equipment specified for the project. Reference: Section 503.2, IECC 2006. 4. Clarify the balancing information for HP-1; it is scheduled as providing 2,400 CFM but the plans show it providing 3,080 CFM. Reference: Sections 106.3.1 and 304.1, IMC 2006. 5. Provide calculations demonstrating adequate ventilation. Reference: Section 403.1, IMC 2006. 6. Ventilation for restrooms in public spaces requires a minimum of 75 CFM of mechanical exhaust per water closet or urinal. Reference: Table 403.3, IMC 2006. 7. Provide information on the sequence of operation for the restroom exhaust to show that recirculation of the air from the restroom will not occur (i.e. as currently shown, if the restroom lights are turned off during occupied hours, 100% of the air supplied to the restroom will be recirculated). Reference: Section 403.2.1, IMC 2006. |
| 06/22/2009 | RAY MAJUTA | ELECTRICAL-COMMERCIAL | REVIEW | Denied | Project: 3372 S 6TH AV TI- T09CM01377 Electrical Plans for this project have been denied for the following, this denial is for the following; 1. 3372 S 6th Av-----T09CM01377 2. 3356 S 6th Av-----T09CM01378 3. 3354 S 6th Av-----T09CM01379 4. 3350 S 6th Av ----T09CM01380 1.If there are any existing loads on the services, these loads must be indicated on the electrical plans.These existing loads are then added to the new loads for a total on the service. 2.The service for Panel A shows a 200 Amp main and a 200 Amp Panel, the note to the feeder indicates a 150 Amp feed only. 3.Panel C is in the same condition as #2. 4.Panel D is in the same condition as #3. 5. Commercial submittals to the City require 2006 IECC Light Budget Calculations. 6. Panel shows circuits 37,39,41, with a 100 amp circuit breaker however the conductor size is #8 good for 50 amps. 7.Provide fault current calculations on let through to panels. Ray T Majuta Electrical Plan Check DSD City of Tucson 520-837-4988 6/23/09 RayMajuta@tucson.gov |
| 06/24/2009 | ROBERT SHERRY | WATER | REVIEW | Approved | |
| 06/24/2009 | RICK MYERS | PLUMBING-COMMERCIAL | REVIEW | Denied | 1. Show how the lavatories meet the 2006 IECC requirements for temperature control. 2. Provide material types for all piping. 3. Show how the domestic water is to be sterilized. |
Final Status
| Task End Date | Reviewer's Name | Type of Review | Description |
|---|---|---|---|
| 07/13/2009 | GERARDO BONILLA | OUT TO CUSTOMER | Completed |
| 07/13/2009 | SUE REEVES | REJECT SHELF | Completed |