Microfiche records prior to 2006 have not been completely digitized and may not be available yet on PRO. If you can not find what you are looking for please submit a records request.

Permit Review Detail

Permit Number: T09CM01370
Parcel: 13316021B

Address:
6616 E GRANT RD

Review Status: Completed

Review Details: COMMERCIAL NEW

Permit Number - T09CM01370
Review Name: COMMERCIAL NEW
Review Status: Completed
Review Date Reviewer's Name Type of Review Description Status Comments
06/01/2009 DAVE MANN FIRE REVIEW Denied Panic hardware is required from seating area per IFC 1008.1.9.

Please include the following fire sprinkler design criteria to the plans.
1. Flow data (static pressure, residual pressure, GPM)
Available from the Fire Department (520) 791-3234
2. The standard to be used in development of sprinkler system. (NFPA 13, NFPA 13R, or NFPA 13D)
3. The hazard classification of the building, including any special hazards.
4. The density required of the water supply.
06/01/2009 JOHN WILLIAMS COMMERCIAL IMPACT FEE COMMERCIAL IMPACT FEE PROCESSING Completed Impact Fee's Do Apply; East District; 2,525 Square Foot Restaurant; Demolition Permit has credited permit. $50.00 Administrative Fee Still Required.
06/03/2009 ERIC NEWCOMB BUILDING-COMMERCIAL REVIEW Denied 1. GENERAL: A MINIMUM 3/32" LETTERING IS REQUIRED ON ALL DRAWINGS (SEE SHEETS S1.3 & S4.1).
2. GENERAL: ALL DEFERRED SUBMITTALS MUST BE APPROVED BY THE BUILDING OFFICIAL, ERNIE DUARTE.
3. SHEET SD1.0; DETAIL 13: PROVIDE CALCULATIONS FOR THE TRASH ENCLOSURE WALL AND FOOTING.
4. SHEET S1.1; STRUCTURAL STEEL: ARE STRUCTURAL STEEL NOTES PERTINENT TO THIS PROJECT? VERIFY AND REMOVE IF NOT REQUIRED.
5. SHEET S1.4; DETAIL 28: WHERE IS THIS DETAIL LOCATED? REFERENCE TO SPECIFIC SHEET, OR REMOVE IF NOT REQUIRED.
6. SHEET S1.4; DETAIL 30: NOTE 1 INDICATES THIS IS A LIGHT POLE, WHILE DETAIL TITLE INDICATES IT IS AN ORDER BOARD. CLARIFY.
7. SHEET S1.4; DETAIL 31: NOTE 1 INDICATES THIS IS A LIGHT POLE, WHILE DETAIL TITLE INDICATES IT IS A CLEARANCE BAR. CLARIFY.
8. SHEET S1.4; DETAIL 32: NOTE 1 INDICATES THIS IS A LIGHT POLE, WHILE DETAIL TITLE INDICATES IT IS A MENU BOARD. CLARIFY.
9. SHEET S1.4 (DETAIL 31); CALCULATIONS: PAGES 143 AND 144 OF THE CALCULATIONS INDICATE THE CLEARANCE BAR FOOTING TO BE 18" DIAMETER X 6' DEPTH. THIS DIFFERS FROM THE DETAIL. CLARIFY.
10. SHEET S1.4 (DETAIL 30); CALCULATIONS: PAGES 145 AND 146 OF THE CALCULATIONS INDICATE THE ORDER BOARD CANOPY FOOTING TO BE 18" DIAMETER X 6' DEPTH. THIS DIFFERS FROM THE DETAIL. CLARIFY.
11. SHEET S1.4 (DETAIL 32); CALCULATIONS: PAGES 149 AND 150 OF THE CALCULATIONS INDICATE THE MENU BOARD FOOTING TO BE 24" DIAMETER X 4'-9" DEPTH. THIS DIFFERS FROM THE DETAIL. CLARIFY.
12. SHEET S2.1; CALCULATIONS: SHEETS 3 AND 48 OF THE CALCULATIONS INDICATE A 6X6 POST AT BEAM B9. THE POSTS ARE INDICATED AS 4X4 IN THE SOUTHWEST CORNER OF THE BUILDING. CLARIFY.
13. SHEET S3.1; CALCULATIONS: SHEETS 2 (KEY PLAN) AND 39 (B11) OF THE CALCULATIONS INDICATE A BEAM SIZE OF 2-2X6, WHILE THE DRAWING INDICATES 2 LOCATIONS FOR THAT BEAM, SIZED AS 3-2X12 AND 3-2X10. CLARIFY.
14. GENERAL: SUBMIT WRITTEN RESPONSES TO ALL ITEMS LISTED HERE FOR SUBSEQUENT REVIEWS.
06/04/2009 ROBERT SHERRY WATER REVIEW Denied Show the size and location of the reduced pressure backflow preventer on the site plan. Reference: Section 103.2.3, UPC 2006.
06/04/2009 ERIC NEWCOMB ZONING HC SITE REVIEW Approved
06/04/2009 ROBERT SHERRY MECHANICAL-COMMERCIAL REVIEW Denied 1. Provide energy code compliance calculations for the building envelope. Provide sufficient detail on the drawings to evaluate the energy compliance of the building envelope. The information shall, as a minimum, include U-factors and the SHGF for the fenestration components and with the R-values of the insulation. Reference: Sections 101.4 and 104.2, International Energy Conservation Code 2006.
2. Provide information on the sequence of operation for the restroom exhaust fan to show that recirculation of the air from the restrooms will not occur. Reference: Section 403.2.1, IMC 2006.
3. Provide information to show that the proposed grease duct insulation system complies with ASTM E 2336. Reference: Section 506.3.10 (1), IMC 2006.
4. Provide information to show that the operation of the Type I hood and the hood exhaust fan complies with Section 507.2.1.1, IMC 2006.
5. Provide structural calculations and details to show that the Type I hood is supported from the building structure in accordance with Section 507.6, IMC 2006. Reference: Section 302.1, IMC 2006.
06/09/2009 STEVE SHIELDS ZONING REVIEW Denied DSD TRANSMITTAL

FROM: Steve Shields
Lead Planner

PROJECT: Taco Bell @ 6616 E. Grant
T09CM01370
Building Plan (1st Review)

TRANSMITTAL DATE: June 9, 2009

1. The building plan has been reviewed by Zoning Review Section but cannot approve the plan until all zoning comments or concerns have been addressed.

2. Zoning could not verify that the building plan was in compliance with the approved site plan.. Please submit two copies of the approved and stamped site plan with the next building plan submittal.

3. Zoning will re-review the building plan on the next submittal to insure compliance with the approved and stamped site plan. Additional comments may be forthcoming.

If you have any questions about this transmittal, please contact me at Steve.Shields@tucsonaz.gov or (520) 837-4956

C:\planning\grading\t09cm01370.doc

RESUBMITTAL OF THE FOLLOWING IS REQUIRED:
06/09/2009 RICK MYERS PLUMBING-COMMERCIAL REVIEW Denied 1. The three compartment sink is to be directly connected to the sanitary sewer. One compartment may be indirectly wasted if it is a prep-bowl, or a sanitizing bowl. 2. Add sterilization requirements for the potable water system to the Plumbing Notes. Reference 609.9 2006 UPC. 3. Reference 411.4 2006 UPC, show how the floor is to be sloped to the floor drains. 4. See detail 4 on sheet P5.0 water isometric. Reference 609.10 2006 UPC water hammer. Show locations of hammer arrestors.
06/16/2009 RAY MAJUTA ELECTRICAL-COMMERCIAL REVIEW Denied Project: T09CM01370
6616 E Grant Rd.
Restaurant, Taco Bell

The Electrical Plans have been denied for the following;

1.Commercial Submittal Requirements for DSD City of Tucson state that full compliance be shown with the City of Tucson/Pima County 2006 Outdoor Lighting Code, Ord # 10135.The ordinance can be obtained on the City of Tucson Web page, under DSD, Building Codes.


Ray T Majuta
Elect Plan Check
DSD City of Tucson
RayMajuta@tucsonaz.gov
6/15/09
06/22/2009 GERRY KOZIOL WWM REVIEW Approved
06/24/2009 PAUL MACHADO ENGINEERING REVIEW Denied The bldg. plans cannot be approved prior to the approval of the Site Plan and/or Grading Plans. 07-06-09. PM.

Final Status

Task End Date Reviewer's Name Type of Review Description
08/13/2009 SUE REEVES OUT TO CUSTOMER Completed
08/13/2009 SUE REEVES REJECT SHELF Completed