Permit Review Detail
Review Status: Completed
Review Details: SITE
Permit Number - T09CM01357
Review Name: SITE
Review Status: Completed
| Review Date | Reviewer's Name | Type of Review | Description | Status | Comments |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 05/29/2009 | MARTIN BROWN | FIRE | REVIEW | Denied | A fire hydrant or fire sprinklers will be required. Please indicate on plans which option owner chooses to use. Refer to City of Tucson amendments to the 2006 International Fire Code (section 508) for spacing and location requirements of fire hydrants. Also, title block on sheets 2 and 3 have incorrect information. |
| 06/01/2009 | RONALD BROWN | ZONING HC SITE | REVIEW | Denied | 1. Delete the reference note 4 to all curb ramps within the property line. COT DOT 207 is for Public Right of Way construction only. 2. Provide a new note number 8 referencing ICC/ANSI 117.1, Section 406 for all curb ramps located within the property line. 3. At the front entrance curb ramp: a. ramp flared sides are to be a min of 1:10 slope b. Provide a string of dimensions from the curb to the door jamb providing for a 4' wide clearance from the top of the curb ramp to the open face of the door. 4. Provide a large scale curb ramp detail, complying with ICC/ANSI 117.1 Section 406 showing all dimensions, slopes, detectable warnings, accessible routes and marked crosswalks. 5. Provide a new marked crossing accross the loading zone or provide a pedestrian walkway around the loading zone as per Zoning requirements. Reference Zoning comments. 6. Provide a continious concrete pedestrian accessible route to Speedway from the marked crossing or the walk around. Reference Zoning comments. END OF COMMENTS |
| 06/01/2009 | STEVE SHIELDS | ZONING | REVIEW | Denied | DSD TRANSMITTAL FROM: Steve Shields Lead Planner PROJECT: Circle K @ Speedway & Mognolia. T09CM01357 Site Plan (1st Review) TRANSMITTAL DATE: June 1, 2009 COMMENTS: Please resubmit revised drawings and a response letter, which states how all Zoning Review Section comments regarding the Land Use Code and Development Standards were addressed. 1. This site plan was reviewed for compliance with the City of Tucson Development Standards (D.S.) and Land Use Code (LUC) for full code compliance. 2. It appears that there is some type of lot combination/lot split proposed. Please clarify what is proposed. The lot combination/lot split will need to be approved prior to approval of the site plan. 3. Based on recent aerial photos parcel #127-02-2540 located to the east, has vehicle access through this parcel. Demonstrate how this access will be maintained. 4. D.S. 2-02.2.1.A.6 Provide overall building dimensions on the site plan. 5. D.S. 2-02.2.1.A.7 General Note 5 references "ESTABLISHED AREA", as this site is located on an MS&R Route it is considered "DEVELOPING AREA" therefore all street perimeter yards are based on LUC Section 3.2.6.5.B and LUC Table 3.2.6.I. Revised General Note 5 to reflect "DEVELOPING AREA" or remove the reference from the note. 6. D.S. 2-02.2.1.A.7 Keynote 1 references "PERIMETER YARD DD ADJACENT TO C" please clarify what you are trying to say in this note. 7. D.S. 2-02.2.1.A.7 Based on the average daily traffic (ADT) for 1st Avenue the street perimeter yard setback is measured from the back of curb, see LUC Table 3.2.6.I. 8. D.S. 2-02.2.1.A.7 Based on the ADT) for Speedway Blvd the street perimeter yard setback is measured from the back of future curb, see LUC Table 3.2.6.I. Identify the future curb on the plan and show the street perimeter setback dimension correctly. 9. D.S. 2-02.2.1.A.8 On the "TYPICAL HANDICAP AND STANDARD PARKING SPACE DETAIL" provide a dimension for the location of the shown wheel stop, see D.S. 3-05.2.3.C.2. 10. D.S. 2-02.2.1.A.9 Provide a bicycle parking detail that includes materials for lighting, paving, and security; fully dimensioned layout; location; specific type of rack and the number of bicycles it supports. 11. D.S. 2-02.2.1.A.9 The proposed location of the bicycle parking does not meet the requirements of D.S. 2-09.4.1 12. D.S. 2-02.2.1.A.9 Keynote 6 points to an area near the southeast corner of the proposed building but there are no Class 1 bicycle parking spaces shown, please clarify. 13. D.S. 2-02.2.1.A.12 Per D.S. 2-08.3.1 a continuous pedestrian circulation path/accessible route is required to contact to the pedestrian circulation path/accessible route located in any adjacent right-of-way (ROW) to the proposed building on site. This said a sidewalk is required to connect the proposed building to the sidewalk located within the ROW along Speedway Blvd. 14. D.S. 2-02.2.1.A.13 If applicable show the location, type, size and height of any existing or proposed signage on the site plan. 15. D.S. 2-02.2.1.A.14 Per LUC Section 3.4.4.6 Striping of Loading Spaces. Loading spaces shall be striped in such a manner as to distinguish the space from motor vehicle parking spaces and other uses on the site. 16. D.S. 2-02.2.1.A.20 There is a "16' ELEC. ESMT." called out on the plan that runs under the proposed building. This easement will need to be abandoned prior to approval of the site plan. 17. D.S. 2-02.2.1.A.25 Provide a detail of the proposed site lighting that clearly shows the clear dimension from the bottom of fixture to grade. Per D.S. 3-05.2.4.1.A The minimum height clearance for access along PAALs is fifteen (15) feet. The height is needed for high-profile vehicles, such as sanitation, fire, or delivery vehicles. 18. D.S. 2-02.2.2 There are some of the required calculations shown under the "SITE PLAN & GRADING PLAN NOTES" and some shown under the "SITE PLAN CALCULATIONS" please group all required calculations together. 19. D.S. 2-02.2.2.A.3 The Floor area ratio (FAR) shows a proposed FAR of 0.17 (11,062 SF) and under "SITE PLAN CALCULATIONS #2" the total floor area shown is 4,551 SF. Please clarify the total building square footage so that the correct FAR can be verified. 20. D.S. 2-02.2.2.A.3 Under "SITE PLAN CALCULATIONS #3" there is reference to "PERCENT OF BUILIDNG COVERAGE", please remove all references to building coverage as it is not applicable to this project. 21. D.S. 2-02.2.2.A.4 The bicycle parking calculation is not correct. Per LUC Section 3.3.3.5 Bicycle Parking Requirements. The number of required bicycle parking spaces is calculated as a percentage of the total number of motor vehicle parking spaces provided. If the calculated number of required bicycle parking spaces is less than two (2), the minimum number of required spaces is two (2). This said the bicycle parking should be based on 23 vehicle parking spaces provided or two (2) required. Per LUC Section 3.3.7.8.A. Any use providing less than fifty (50) motor vehicle parking spaces may substitute Class 2 spaces for Class 1 spaces. This said two (2) Class 2 bicycle parking spaces are required. For your information a single inverted "U" bicycle rack can support two (2) bicycles. 22. D.S. 2-02.2.2.A.5 Within the loading space calculation provide the required size and the provided size. 23. Depending on how the above comments are addressed addition comments may be forth coming. If you have any questions about this transmittal, please contact me at Steve.Shields@tucsonaz.gov or (520) 837-4956. C:\planning\site\t09cm01357 RESUBMITTAL OF THE FOLLOWING IS REQUIRED: Revised site plan and additional requested documents. |
| 06/11/2009 | ANDREW CONNOR | LANDSCAPE | REVIEW | Denied | 1. Within a vehicular use area, one (1) canopy tree is required for each 10 motor vehicle parking spaces and every parking space shall be located within forty (40) feet of the trunk of a canopy tree (as measured from the center of the tree trunk) per LUC 3.7.2.3.A.1. Additional tree is required. 2. One (1) canopy tree must be provided for every thirty-three (33) linear feet of landscape border or fraction thereof, excluding vehicular ingress or egress points. According to the University of Arizona Pima County Cooperative Extension, Caesalpinia gilliesii is considered a large irregular shrub and not acceptable as a canopy tree. Choose appropriate plant material. 3. All landscape areas will be depressed to accept water flow from roofs, PAAL, and parking areas. Show by detail or spot elevations how landscape areas will accommodate water harvesting. 4. The site plan and landscape plan must show identical site layout to avoid conflict between the two plans. Ensure that all changes to the site plan are reflected on the landscape plan. 5. Additional comments may apply. |
| 06/12/2009 | ANDREW CONNOR | NPPO | REVIEW | Approved | Exception |
| 06/16/2009 | ROBERT SHERRY | PLUMBING-COMMERCIAL | REVIEW | Denied | Revise the site drawing to include the location of the closest fire hydrants Reference: City of Tucson Development Standard No. 2-05.0 2.3 and Section 103.2.3, UPC 2006. |
| 06/23/2009 | PAUL MACHADO | ENGINEERING | REVIEW | Denied | To: Star Consulting, Incorporated DATE: June 24, 2009 5405 E. Placita Hayuco Tucson, Arizona 85718 SUBJECT: Circle K, 5210 E. Speedway Blvd. Site Plan T09CM01357 (First Review) T14S, R14E, Section 11 RESUBMITTAL REQUIRED: Site Plan and Drainage Statement. The Site Plan (SP) and Drainage Statement (DS) cannot be approved as submitted. Please address the following review comments prior to the next submittal. Site Plan: 1. Please include a response letter to the comments along with the corrected copies of the SP. 2. As per the Federal ADA requirements, all wheel chair ramps shall have the truncated domes instead of the standard grooves that are shown on COT SD 207. Aside from the Truncated Domes, all wheel chair ramps shall be constructed in accordance with COT SD 207. 3. Fully dimensioned loading space(s) and maneuvering area(s) per D.S. 2-02.2.1.14. 4. Show the limits of the 100-year floodplain and water surface elevation per D.S. 2-02.2.1.15. 5. Provide 2' depressed curb openings or show how the stormwater will be directed into the water harvesting areas. 6. Provide bollards for the 6' depressed curb for water harvesting. 7. Call out extruded or vertical curb details and locations. 8. Remove or edit note no. 24. 5-year threshold retention is required. 9. List the source of the "Basis of Bearing" in the BOB note. 10. Show all fences, walls, or vegetation for screening and sight visibility by type, material, height, location and spacing per D.S. 2-02.2.1.27. 11. List Site plan number (T09CM01357) and Grading Plan number (T09BU00776) on the plans. 12. Show refuse container location, size, and access thereto fully dimensioned per D.S. 2-02.2.1.32 and D.S. 6-01.0. The site plan and grading plan are combined so the detail shall be shown on the detail sheet fully dimensioned. The service vehicle cannot reverse in excess of 40' in order to exit the site. 13. Show/call-out all perimeter walls on the property lines with drainage blocks. 14. A permit or a private improvement agreement will be necessary for any work performed within the Right-of-way. Contact Permits and Codes at (520) 791-5100 for permit information. 15. 6 foot sidewalks are required on all projects that have frontage with a MS and R street. 16. Water harvesting areas cannot be located in the present or future R/W. Relocate water harvesting areas or obtain permission from Permits and Codes for location of water harvesting areas in the R/W. 17. Please show a typical cross section of the P.A.A.L. or call out the percentage of slopes. Call out the GB at the D/W, if applicable. Drainage Statement: 1. Please include a response letter to the comments along with the corrected copies of the DS. 2. Include a comparison between the volume of the stormwater in all the water harvesting areas and the required 5-year threshold retention amount in the DS. 3. Show/call-out all perimeter walls on the property lines with drainage blocks. 4. Provide 2' depressed curb openings or show how the stormwater will be directed into the water harvesting areas. 5. Call out peak discharges entering and exiting the site. 6. Show details of all surface and subsurface drainage devices including aprons and basins. 7. Show the project address or administration address on the cover sheet of the DS. If you have any questions, I can be reached at 837-4932 or Paul.Machado@tucsonaz.gov Paul P. Machado Senior Engineering Associate City of Tucson/Development Services Department 201 N. Stone Avenue P.O. Box 27210 Tucson, Arizona 85726-7210 (520) 837-4932 office (520) 879-8010 fax C:/5210 E. Speedway Blvd_Site |
Final Status
| Task End Date | Reviewer's Name | Type of Review | Description |
|---|---|---|---|
| 07/02/2009 | CINDY AGUILAR | OUT TO CUSTOMER | Completed |
| 07/02/2009 | SUE REEVES | REJECT SHELF | Completed |