Permit Review Detail
Review Status: Completed
Review Details: RESUBMITTAL - SITE ALL
Permit Number - T09CM01333
Review Name: RESUBMITTAL - SITE ALL
Review Status: Completed
| Review Date | Reviewer's Name | Type of Review | Description | Status | Comments |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 07/22/2009 | MARTIN BROWN | FIRE | REVIEW | Approved | |
| 07/22/2009 | RONALD BROWN | ZONING HC SITE | REVIEW | Denied | 1. At detail F/AS-2, Zoing requires 4' accessible route at top of landing. Reference zoning comments. |
| 07/23/2009 | DAVID RIVERA | ZONING | REVIEW | Denied | DSD TRANSMITTAL FROM: David Rivera Principal Planner PROJECT: T09CM01333 801 W Miracle Mile Site Plan Review (Phase I only) (Two new buildings to replace portions of existing buildings) TRANSMITTAL DATE: July 23, 2009 COMMENTS: Please resubmit revised drawings along with redlines and a response letter, which states how all Zoning Review Section comments regarding the Land Use Code and Development Standards were addressed. 1. Some of the previous comments were not completely addressed or must be revised to demonstrate compliance. Please see the remaining previous comments noted as such. (Previous Comments: The following comments have been made based on the review of the plans sheets labeled as site plan, sheets AS-1 and AS-2. Revise the site plan sheets to provide the requested zoning information. Some of the requested information may be on other sheets in the packet but the information for the site plan must be consistent with the DS 2-02.) 2. I could not find the key note or general note requested per my previous comment. (I acknowledge that the legal description is on sheet C-1.) (Previous Comment 3: Add a note on the site plan sheet that states or references the plan sheet where the Legal Description of the property can be found or add the legal description to the site plan sheet(s). DS 2-02.2.1.A.2) 3. I acknowledge that the setbacks have been added to a detail drawing but the setbacks should actually be shown on the site plan sheet AS-1 or the detail drawing(s) can be added to sheet AS-3. (I have reviewed the detail sheet and what has been depicted demonstrates compliance for the setbacks.) (Previous Comment 5: Revise or address the following building setbacks for the two story structure as follows. Along the south side of the property the minimum setback is based on 21 feet or the height of the structure measured from edge of the nearest travel lane. Along the east side of the property the building setback is based on the greatest of five feet or ½ the height from the back of the existing curb, or 1 foot from the property line. (The height is to be measured from design grade.) DS 2-02.2.1.A.7) 4. The bicycle parking calculation must be revised to reflect that both class one and class two facilities are being provided. The plan only depicts the class two facilities. Under previous comment 7 the ratio of required parking was provided. Only the class two facilities were depicted and included in the bicycle parking calculation. Add the class one facilities to the plan and revise the bicycle parking calculation to include both types of facilities. Refer to Ds 2-09 for specifics on the requirements for class one and two facilities. Include the detail drawings for the class one facilities. (A portion of Previous Comment 6: Please be aware that the vehicle and bicycle parking is being reviewed for Phase I only. DS 2-02.2.1.A.8 Previous Comment 7: Off-street bicycle parking, including materials for lighting, paving, and Security; fully dimensioned layout; location; specific type of rack and the number of bicycles it supports; and the location and type of directional signage. Provide bicycle parking based on the ratio below. See Development standards for facility dimensions and location requirements. Bicycle: Eight (8) percent for multifamily projects of four (4) or more units - fifty (50) percent Class 1 and fifty (50) percent Class 2. DS 2-02.2.1.A.9) 5. The back up spur was provided as requested except that the second portion of the standard cannot be verified due to a missing dimension. "A minimum distance of three (3) feet will be provided between the back of spur and any wall, screen, or other obstruction over six (6) inches in height." DS 3-05.2.2.D, Add the dimension as required demonstrating compliance. (Previous Comment 9.c. Provide a back-up spur at the end of the row of parking northwest of the two story structure. The back-up spur requirements are listed in development standards 3-05.2.2.D and Figure 3.) 6. The access ramp details have been depicted on sheet AS-2 as requested. For zoning purposes the minimum width behind the ramps are to be a minimum of four (4) feet wide. It appears that per the detail F on sheet AS-2 the sidewalk area behind the top of the ramp is proposed at three (3) feet. Revise the detail to depict a four (4) wide sidewalk/landing behind the top of the ramp for the two locations where detail F ramp is proposed. Also, refer to Ron Brown's comment related to this item. Draw and label the class one bicycle parking facilities on sheet AS-1. Demonstrate that the class one facility complies with DS 2-09. Add details for the class one facility on sheet AS-2 Previous comment 10.f and .g: Please address and respond the following items related to vehicular, bicycle, pedestrian, and handicapped circulation (clearly identified). DS 2-02.2.1.A.12 f. All access ramps as drawn on the plan do not comply with our current ramp standards. Refer to Ronald Brown's, Structural and ADA plan's reviewer comments related to ADA etc. g. Draw and label the location of the bicycle parking facilities. Include detail drawings of the proposed locations as well as the type of facilities proposed. If the class two facilities are not visible from the street include directional signage that directs the cyclists to the facilities. See development standards 2-09 for the specifics on these requirements. 7. It is not clear on sheet AS-1 where the location of the proposed signage will be located. Per your response comment, you directed me to look for the key notes on the site plan. Key notes or annotation of any signage besides the direction signage for cyclists or the do not enter signs could not be verified on the drawing or as keynotes. If the location of the signage is specific we will defer the review for compliance until the sign permitting process. Please be aware that the signs could be denied or require a variance or DSMR if the signs are within a sight visibility triangle or affect any zoning requirements. (Previous Comment 11: Label the location, type, size, and height of existing and proposed signage. DS 2-02.2.1.A.13) 8. List the TRE case number on sheet AS-1 next to the TRE note. (Previous Comment 12: It appears on the plan that a possible Temporary Revocable Easement is proposed along the east side of the property. If this is the case the TRE must be approved and the documentation must be provided to DSD for review. In this case some of the site elements will be installed or constructed within this TRE and if the TRE is ever revoked the elements will have to be replaced and constructed on the property or Board of Adjustment variance would be required if the required elements cannot e provided on site. Add a note on the site plan sheet that acknowledges this issue and how the developer proposes address it when and if the TRE is ever revoked.) 9. It was not clear from your response comment to previous comment 13 if there were any existing easements on the site that needed to be included on the site plan. Please clarify by response if there are no existing easements of records over this property in Phase I. If easements are in place please draw, dimension and label them with the use or purpose of the easement. (Previous Comment 13: If applicable, all easements of record must be graphically shown on the plan together with recording docket and page reference. the width and purpose of the easement must labeled. DS 2-02.2.1.A.20) 10. Please add or revise the following items as previous requested. Comment 10.c, coverage, should include the vehicular use areas such as parking spaces, carports and Parking Area Access Lanes (PAAL). I included the info on my last comment but I did not notice that it went under comment .d when in should have been included in comment .c. 10.e, the density calculation was not added to sheet AS-1 as requested. If you need additional info on Density calculations see the Land Use Code section 3.2.10. 10.f, list the allowed height of the buildings per Development Designator "R" = 40' allowed 10.g, list as a note the required setbacks from the street perimeters as listed in previous comment 5. 10.k, the building expansion calculation must be listed whether positive or negative expansion. (Previous Comment 19.a - .k: The following calculations are required on the site plan, including the methodology. If there is not enough space on the site plan sheet to include these calculations, another plan sheet may be used. (it is acknowledged that some of the information is on the plan, group the zoning info requested together quick reference and review) The Info should be listed under a heading of Zoning Development Criteria. The information under this heading should include the following.) c. lot coverage (includes all buildings except open porches, d. vehicular use areas which includes carports or garages,), e. Density Calculation allowed and proposed, based on the existing acreage (density allowed per acre =44 RAC), f. building height allowed and actual or proposed, g. perimeter yard indicator "CC", Setback for this project due to four street surrounding the project are based in this case on the adjacent street requirements, utilizing developing areas setbacks, h. Vehicle parking required and proposed, k. The percentage of building area expansion must be listed based on the demo and rebuild occurring. 11. Additional comments may forthcoming on subsequent reviews based on the changes made to the plan that affect zoning requirements. Ensure that any changes that are made to the site plan sheets are incorporated into any relevant sheet. If detail drawings are required to address any zoning comments an additional site plan sheet may used to eliminate any possible clutter on the primary site plan sheet. If you have any questions about this transmittal, please call David Rivera, (520) 791-5608. C:\planning\cdrc\DSD\T09CM01333.doc RESUBMITTAL OF THE FOLLOWING IS REQUIRED: Revised site plan and additional requested documents |
| 07/30/2009 | RICK MYERS | PLUMBING-COMMERCIAL | REVIEW | Denied | 1. A seperate permit is required for the installation of a private sewage collection system with manholes, and a daily discharge greater than 3000 gallons. |
| 08/07/2009 | LOREN MAKUS | ENGINEERING | REVIEW | Approved | |
| 08/12/2009 | PETER MCLAUGHLIN | NPPO | REVIEW | Denied | Submit Application for Exception; include acceptable documentation, which clearly indicates that the project will not impact Protected Native Plants. Such documentation includes photographs of the site taken from all sides of the property. Photographs of the site are necessary for NPPO approval per DS 2-15.2.0.C |
| 08/12/2009 | PETER MCLAUGHLIN | LANDSCAPE | REVIEW | Denied | 1. Street landscape borders are required along all streets fronting the property. A street landscape border, per Sec. 3.7.2.4 of the LUC, is a landscape area with a minimum width of ten (10) feet, running the full length of the street property line(s) bounding the site except for points of ingress-egress. Indicate the required 10-foot landscape border along Glaris Avenue frontage as required. The screen wall along Glaris Avenue frontage must be located at the back of the required 10-foot street landscape border. If Glaris Avenue is being purchased/abandoned or property lines are changing in this area (as indicated by notes on the plan regarding new property lines) provide all documentation/recordation. 2. Fifty (50) percent or more of the street landscape border area must have shrubs and vegetative ground cover per LUC 3.7.2.4 3. One (1) canopy tree must be provided for every thirty-three (33) linear feet of landscape border per LUC 3.7.2.4. Provide calculation on the landscape plan. 4. It is not clear what existing, mature vegetation is to remain on the site. Indicate locations, size, and name of all existing vegetation to remain in place. 5. Refer to DS 2-07.2.2 and DS 2-06.5.4 for the specific content required in the following elements of the landscape plan: Maintenance Schedule and Construction Details. Revise landscape plan to include required content and specifications. DS 2-07.0 6. Revise wall location to meet LUC 3.7.3.2. Fences or walls constructed in a single continuous line shall extend into a street landscape border no more than the actual width of the fence or wall. (See comment 1 regarding screen wall location along Glaris Avenue). 7. Clarify location and extent of curbing. It is not clear that vetical curbs are provided in all locations where vehicular use areas abut landcaped areas. Curbing or other suitable barriers for landscape areas within and adjacent to the vehicular use area must be provided. LUC 3.7.2.3.B 8. Additional comments may be necessary upon resubmittal of the landscape plan. Refer to Development Standards 2-07 for required calculations and other information. |
Final Status
| Task End Date | Reviewer's Name | Type of Review | Description |
|---|---|---|---|
| 08/19/2009 | DELMA ROBEY | OUT TO CUSTOMER | Completed |
| 08/19/2009 | SUE REEVES | REJECT SHELF | Completed |