Microfiche records prior to 2006 have not been completely digitized and may not be available yet on PRO. If you can not find what you are looking for please submit a records request.
Permit Review Detail
Review Status: Completed
Review Details: RESUBMITTAL - TI ALL
Permit Number - T09CM01258
Review Name: RESUBMITTAL - TI ALL
Review Status: Completed
| Review Date | Reviewer's Name | Type of Review | Description | Status | Comments |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 07/30/2009 | RONALD BROWN | ADA | REVIEW | Passed | Not a COT owned/operated property |
| 07/31/2009 | STEVE SHIELDS | ZONING | REVIEW | Approved | |
| 08/04/2009 | RONALD BROWN | ZONING HC SITE | REVIEW | Approved | |
| 08/04/2009 | RONALD BROWN | BUILDING-COMMERCIAL | REVIEW | Denied | 1. Section 5/A2.0 needs to be coordinated with modified roof design of detail numbers 1/A2.0, 2/A1.0 and 2/A3.0. 2. Please provide a detail at the joist bearing seat above the new 3' wide exterior door. 3. Please correct Roof Plan Detail 3/A2.0 to have two scuppers on the East side as per Elevation 1/A2.0 and existing roof drainage calculations. END OF REVIEW |
| 08/11/2009 | JASON GREEN | ENGINEERING | REVIEW | Approved | DATE: August 11, 2009 SUBJECT: 58 W Cushing St Site Plan- 2nd Engineering Review TO: Marvin Shaver LOCATION: T14S R13E Sec13 Ward 6 REVIEWERS: Jason Green, CFM ACTIVITY: T09CM01258 (Site/Building Plan) SUMMARY: Engineering Division of Development Services Department has received and reviewed the site plan (T09CM01258) and building plan (T09CM01258) applications for the above referenced property. Engineering Division recommends approval of the plan sets at this time. SITE PLAN COMMENTS: 1) Complied. 2) Complied. 3) Complied. 4) Complied. 5) Complied. 6) Complied. 7) Complied. BUILDING PLAN COMMENTS: 8) Complied. 9) Complied. GENERAL COMMENTS: For questions, or to schedule an appointment, I can be reached at 837-4929. Jason Green, CFM Senior Engineer Associate Engineering Division COT Development Services |
| 08/17/2009 | ROBERT SHERRY | PLUMBING-COMMERCIAL | REVIEW | Denied | The overflow scuppers shown on the plans appear to be the same height above the roof. Per Section 1101.11.2.2, UPC 2006, the secondary drain shall be a minimum of 2" above the low point of the roof. |
| 08/17/2009 | ROBERT SHERRY | WATER | REVIEW | Approved | |
| 08/17/2009 | ROBERT SHERRY | MECHANICAL-COMMERCIAL | REVIEW | Denied | The condensate will be produced at the indoor coil, not at the condensing unit. Show the actual routing of the condensate drain. Reference: Section 307.2, IMC 2006 and Section 814.0, UPC 2006. |
Final Status
| Task End Date | Reviewer's Name | Type of Review | Description |
|---|---|---|---|
| 08/18/2009 | THAUSER1 | OUT TO CUSTOMER | Completed |
| 08/18/2009 | SUE REEVES | REJECT SHELF | Completed |