Microfiche records prior to 2006 have not been completely digitized and may not be available yet on PRO. If you can not find what you are looking for please submit a records request.

Permit Number: T09CM01223
Parcel: 117041040

Address:
627 N 6TH AV

Review Status: Completed

Review Details: COMMERCIAL TI

Permit Number - T09CM01223
Review Name: COMMERCIAL TI
Review Status: Completed
Review Date Reviewer's Name Type of Review Description Status Comments
05/14/2009 DAVE MANN FIRE REVIEW Denied It s impossible to determine the use of the building from the General Notes. If the second floor is intended for residential use the entire building must be sprinklered per IFC Chapter 9. If the top floor is only office it must have a second exit per IFC Chapter 10.

In either case the IRC cannot be used because it is not scoped for B/R3 uses or B uses.
05/14/2009 RONALD BROWN ADA REVIEW Passed NOT A COT OWNED/OPERATED PROPERTY
05/14/2009 JOHN WILLIAMS COMMERCIAL IMPACT FEE COMMERCIAL IMPACT FEE PROCESSING Completed
05/15/2009 RONALD BROWN ZONING HC SITE REVIEW Denied REFERENCE BUILDING COMMENTS
05/15/2009 RONALD BROWN BUILDING-COMMERCIAL REVIEW Denied 1. Provide Building Code Analysis form.
2. This is a commerical business project that must comply to the 2006 IBC, not the IRC. Change all references from IRC to the IBC and provide a new commerical building code compliance search and revise project as required.
3. The required accessible code is 2006 IBC, Chapter 11 and ICC/ANSI 117.1. Revise all accessible references to this code and project design accordingly.
4. Access ramp does not comply with ICC/ANSI 117.1, Sections 405; no top landing , no handfrails, show length and rise.
5. Both new toilet rooms are non-compliant with Chapter 11, Section 1109.2 and ICC/ANSI 117.1, Sections 603, mainly clear space allowances and encroachments including new tub. Provide interior elevations of all walls showing compliance.
6. The first floor kitchen sink, the sceond floor new bath (207) lav and the wet bar sink, provide interior elevations showing accessible compliance with heights, insulation and approach clearances as per sections 606 and 305.5.
7. Please provide on the drawings, a footing schedule.
8. The registrant seal for the structural drawings and the structural calculations must be the same.
9. Provide structural calculations for the HVAC unit located in the attic space.

END OF REVIEW
05/18/2009 GERRY KOZIOL WWM REVIEW Denied need 5th floor wastewater credit evaluation
05/22/2009 TERRY STEVENS ZONING REVIEW Denied 05/22/2009

Development Services Department
Zoning Review Section

Terry Stevens
Lead Planner

Comments:

1. The building plan has been reviewed by Zoning Review Section but cannot approve the plan until it has been approved by the Engineering, and Landscape Review Sections and until all zoning comments or concerns have been addressed.

2. Zoning could not verify that the building plan was in compliance with the approved site plan. Please submit two copies of the approved and stamped site, landscape, and NPPO plans with the next building plan submittal.

3. Zoning will re-review the building plan on the next submittal to insure compliance with the approved site plan. Additional comments may be forthcoming.
06/01/2009 ROBERT SHERRY WATER REVIEW Denied 1. Reduced pressure backflow prevention assemblies are required to be installed directly after the water meter for commercial buildings that have multiple uses. Reference: COT Ordinance 9976, http://www.tucsonaz.gov/water/docs/backflow-ord.pdf
2. Provide a letter from Tucson Water confirming that the use of a 5/8" water meter (there are no ¾" water meters in service) will be allowed for this project (25.5 fixture units equates to a demand of 17 GPM).
06/01/2009 ROBERT SHERRY MECHANICAL-COMMERCIAL REVIEW Denied 1. The 2006 International Mechanical Code with Local Amendments is the relevant mechanical code for this project.
2. Demonstrate energy code compliance using calculations based on the current code. Reference: Sections 101.4 and 502, International Energy Conservation Code 2006.
3. Show how the fan coils are being connected to the building structure and provide calculations to show that the building structure is not being adversely affected. Reference: Section 302.1, IMC 2006.
4. Coordinate the plumbing drawings with the mechanical drawings with respect to the location and name of the fan coil labeled "AC-1" and "F-1"; similarly clarify the name of the other fan coil, "AC-2" and "FC-2". Reference: Section 106.3.1, IMC 2006.
5. Show how the fan coils located in the attic comply with the requirements of Sections 306.3 and 306.3.1, IMC 2006.
6. Clarify the number of ceiling-mounted exhaust fans to be installed. Reference: Section 106.3.1, IMC 2006.
7. Clarify the backgrounds for the first and second floors to show only the proposed backgrounds, not the existing and the proposed. Reference: Section 106.3.1, IMC 2006.
8. Clarify the relative spacing of the terminations for the furnace flues (AC-1 and AC-2) and the outside air intakes for the fan coil units. Reference: Section 401.4.1, IMC 2006.
06/02/2009 ROBERT SHERRY PLUMBING-COMMERCIAL REVIEW Denied 1. The applicable code for all commercial plumbing projects is the 2006 Uniform Plumbing Code with Local Amendments (sheet A0.00 calls out the 2006 IRC).
2. Clarify the backgrounds for the first and second floors on sheet P-1 to show only the proposed backgrounds, not the existing and the proposed. Reference: Section 103.2.3, UPC 2006.
3. Provide the minimum plumbing facilities required by Table 2902.1 and Section 2902.2, IBC 2006, for a business occupancy.
4. Complete the waste and vent isometrics, i.e. finish dimensioning the trap arms and show the cleanouts noted on the first floor plumbing plan (P-1). Reference: Section 103.2.3, UPC 2006.
5. Installation of the water heater shall conform to the manufacturer's installation instructions for location, clearances, and thermal expansion. Reference: Section 501.0, UPC 2006
6. Provide details to show how the water and gas piping, the pressure relief valve, and the direct vent flue and air supply inlet are to be installed. Reference: Sections 103.2.3 and 501.0, UPC 2006.
7. Clarify the terminal location of the direct vent flue and air supply inlet with respect to building openings or other building features. Reference: Section 510.2.5, UPC 2006.
8. One of the specified fixtures (Rinnai water heater) requires a minimum pressure greater than the 15-PSI used in the water pipe sizing calculations. Revise calculations as necessary. Reference: Section 608.1, UPC 2006.
9. Provide the rim elevation of the next upstream sanitary manhole and the first floor elevation. Determine the need for a backwater valve per Section 710.1, UPC 2006, as amended by the City of Tucson.
10. Vent pipes shall not be reduced in size as they extend towards their termination. Reference: Section 905.4, UPC 2006.
11. Clarify the type of bathtub scheduled as P-3 and its method of installation; is it really wall hung? Reference: Section 103.2.3, UPC 2006.
06/04/2009 RAY MAJUTA ELECTRICAL-COMMERCIAL REVIEW Denied Project: 627 N 6th Av
T09CM01223
Residential to Commercial---Office T I


The Electrical Plans have been denied for the following:

1.Commercial Submittal Requirements ------- need calculations per The 2006 ICEE for the lighting concerning thios TI
2. As per #1 a fixture schedule showing the number of lamps and wattage per fixture type.
3. Show existing circuits on Pnl A on the power plan.







Ray T Majuta
DSD City of Tucson
Elect Plan CK
6/05/09
520-837-4988
06/09/2009 JASON GREEN ENGINEERING REVIEW Denied DATE: June 10, 2009
SUBJECT: MURPHY 1 Site Plan- Engineering Review
TO: Alexandra Murphy
LOCATION: 627 N 6th Ave
REVIEWERS: Jason Green, CFM
ACTIVITY: T09CM01223 (Site Plan)


SUMMARY: Engineering Division of Development Services Department has received and reviewed the site and building plan (T09CM01223) for the above referenced property. Engineering Division does not recommend approval of the site plan application at this time. The following items need to be addressed:


SITE PLAN COMMENTS:

1) Provide a copy of the last approved site plan.

2) Provide a site plan that complies with DS Sec.2-02 and any relevant sections of the LUC. Per a discussion with Terry Stevens, Zoning Plan Reviewer a new site plan will be submitted that differs from the one that is currently in for review. The new proposed site plan will be reviewed by the Engineering Section once submitted.

3) If the Zoning Section determines that the improvements warrant a full code compliance review provide all required information from DS Sec.2-02, 3-01, 3-05, 6-01, etc.

4) The building plan application will be approved concurrently with the site plan application once all comments have been addressed.

5) Be advised that further comments may be forth coming on resubmittal of the site plan.


GENERAL COMMENTS:

Please provide a revised site plan that addresses the comments provided above. Include a comprehensive response letter addressing in detail responses to all of the above comments.

For questions or to schedule an appointment I can be reached at 837-4929.



Jason Green, CFM
Senior Engineer Associate
Engineering Division
COT Development Services

Final Status

Task End Date Reviewer's Name Type of Review Description
06/16/2009 CPIERCE1 OUT TO CUSTOMER Completed
06/16/2009 SUE REEVES REJECT SHELF Completed