Microfiche records prior to 2006 have not been completely digitized and may not be available yet on PRO. If you can not find what you are looking for please submit a records request.
Permit Review Detail
Review Status: Completed
Review Details: RESUBMITTAL
Permit Number - T09CM01206
Review Name: RESUBMITTAL
Review Status: Completed
| Review Date | Reviewer's Name | Type of Review | Description | Status | Comments |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 06/03/2009 | MARTIN BROWN | FIRE | REVIEW | Approved | |
| 06/04/2009 | GERRY KOZIOL | WWM | REVIEW | Denied | NEED COT PERMIT FOR ON-SITE PRIVATE SEWER- NEED DEQ REVIEWOF 8" ON-SITE PRIVATE SEWER (WITH MANHOLES & PROVISIONS FOSR FUTURE SERVICE TO ADJACENT LOT)- NEED COPY OF ON-SITE PRIVATE FOR BASE MAP UPDATE. |
| 06/04/2009 | STEVE SHIELDS | ZONING | REVIEW | Denied | DSD TRANSMITTAL FROM: Steve Shields Lead Planner PROJECT: U.S.F.S. 2648 E. Commerce Center Place T09CM01206 Building Plan (1st Review) TRANSMITTAL DATE: June 4, 2009 1. The building plan has been reviewed by Zoning Review Section but cannot approve the plan until all zoning comments or concerns have been addressed. 2. Zoning could not verify that the building plan was in compliance with the approved development plan. Please submit two copies of the approved and stamped development plan with the next building plan submittal. 3. Zoning will re-review the building plan on the next submittal to insure compliance with the approved and stamped development plan. Additional comments may be forthcoming. If you have any questions about this transmittal, please contact me at Steve.Shields@tucsonaz.gov or (520) 837-4956 C:\planning\grading\t09cm01206.doc RESUBMITTAL OF THE FOLLOWING IS REQUIRED: |
| 06/08/2009 | LAITH ALSHAMI | ENGINEERING | REVIEW | Denied | Laith Alshami, Engineering and Floodplain Review, 06/08/2009, Site Plan can not be approved until Development Package is approved. |
| 06/10/2009 | ERIC NEWCOMB | BUILDING-COMMERCIAL | REVIEW | Approved | |
| 06/11/2009 | ERIC NEWCOMB | ZONING HC SITE | REVIEW | Approved | |
| 06/16/2009 | ROBERT SHERRY | PLUMBING-COMMERCIAL | REVIEW | Denied | 1. Provide vent piping of sufficient size to comply with Section 904.1, UPC 2006. Vents located upstream from pumps, ejectors, backwater valves, or other devices that obstruct the free flow of gases between the building sewer and the outside atmosphere shall not be used for meeting the required cross-sectional vent area. 2. Clarify the termination of the overflow drains for the roof drainage system. Detail W on sheet 11 of 24 (civil) refers to the architectural drawings for the termination of the overflow drains but no details were found. Reference: Sections 103.2.3 and 1101.11.2.2.1, UPC 2006. |
| 06/16/2009 | ROBERT SHERRY | MECHANICAL-COMMERCIAL | REVIEW | Denied | The requested energy calculations were not included in this submittal. Provide energy code compliance calculations (envelope and mechanical) using the correct climate zone (Pima County < 4,000 feet). Reference: Sections 101.4 and 104.2, International Energy Conservation Code 2006. |