Microfiche records prior to 2006 have not been completely digitized and may not be available yet on PRO. If you can not find what you are looking for please submit a records request.
Permit Review Detail
Review Status: Completed
Review Details: COMMERCIAL NEW
Permit Number - T09CM01206
Review Name: COMMERCIAL NEW
Review Status: Completed
| Review Date | Reviewer's Name | Type of Review | Description | Status | Comments |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 05/13/2009 | DAVE MANN | FIRE | REVIEW | Denied | Panic hardware is required from all exits from the assembly area until out side of the building. IFC 1008.1.9. Fire lane signs shall be per IFC Appendix D. Please include the following fire sprinkler design criteria to the plans. 1. Flow data (static pressure, residual pressure, GPM) Available from the Fire Department (520) 791-3234 2. The standard to be used in development of sprinkler system. (NFPA 13, not UBC 38-1) 3. The hazard classification of the building, including any special hazards. 4. The density required of the water supply. |
| 05/13/2009 | JOHN WILLIAMS | COMMERCIAL IMPACT FEE | COMMERCIAL IMPACT FEE PROCESSING | Completed | Impact Fee's Do Apply; 12,800 Square Foot Office; West District; $80,869.20 |
| 05/14/2009 | ERIC NEWCOMB | ZONING HC SITE | REVIEW | Denied | 1. SEE BUILDING COMMENTS. |
| 05/14/2009 | ERIC NEWCOMB | BUILDING-COMMERCIAL | REVIEW | Denied | 1. PREVIOUS CORRESPONDENCE WITH ANTHONY BOONE CONFIRMS THIS PROJECT WILL FOLLOW THE 2006 IBC AND ICC/ANSI A117.1-2003 GUIDELINES FOR ACCESSIBILITY. 2. SHEET A0.0; PROJECT DATA: ADD NOTE THAT THIS BUILDING IS FULLY SPRINKLERED. 3. SHEET A2.0; FLOOR PLAN; DOORS 108, 130, AND 140: CONFIRM THERE IS 12" MINIMUM CLEAR ON THE LATCH SIDE OF THE DOOR FOR MANEUVERING PER FIGURE 404.2.3.1(b). NOTE ON DRAWING. 4. SHEET A2.0; FLOOR PLAN; DOORS 110, 118,131, 133, AND 135: PER THE IBC SECTION 1005.2, THE DOOR MAY NOT ENCROACH INTO THE PATH OF EGRESS TRAVEL WHERE IT REDUCES THE REQUIRED WIDTH TO LESS THAN 1/2 DURING THE DOOR SWING. REVISE. 5. SHEET A2.1; ELEVATIONS B-1 AND D-1: INDICATE VERTICAL GRAB BARS PER ANSI A117.1-2003, FIGURE 604.5.1. 6. SHEET A2.1; ELEVATION 3: LOCATE PAPER DISPENSER PER ANSI A117.1, FIGURE 604.7(a). 7. SHEET A2.1; GENERAL NOTES: REMOVE REFERENCES OF ADAAG (ADAGE) AND IBC 2003. REPLACE WITH CORRECT CODE AND CORRESPONDING SECTIONS. 8. SHEET A2.2; ELEVATIONS F-2 AND H-2: INDICATE VERTICAL GRAB BARS PER ANSI A117.1-2003, FIGURE 604.5.1. 9. SHEET A2.2; ELEVATION 3: LOCATE PAPER DISPENSER PER ANSI A117.1, FIGURE 604.7(a). 10. SHEET A2.2; GENERAL NOTES: REMOVE REFERENCES OF ADAAG (ADAGE) AND IBC 2003. REPLACE WITH CORRECT CODE AND CORRESPONDING SECTIONS. 11. SHEET A2.2; ELEVATION I-1: ANSI SECTION 703.3.11 REQUIRES SIGNAGE LOCATION ALONGSIDE THE DOOR ON THE LATCH SIDE. VERIFY. 12. SHEET A2.3; ELEVATION 1; SECTIONS 1, 2, 3, AND 4: ADJUST COUNTER TOP HEIGHT ABOVE THE FINISH FLOOR PER ANSI CHAPTER 9. 13. SHEET A2.4; ELEVATION 5 AND SECTION 6: ANSI SECTION 308 PROVIDES MAXIMUM AND MINIMUM VALUES FOR REACH LIMITATIONS. ADJUST ELEVATION 5 AND SECTION 6 TO MEET THOSE REQUIREMENTS. 14. SHEET A3.1; DOOR SCHEDULE: THE HEAD DETAIL SHOULD BE A3.2/9. VERIFY. 15. SHEET A3.1; DOOR SCHEDULE GENERAL NOTES (4): REMOVE AND REPLACE REFERENCE TO ADAAG. 16. SHEET A3.1; DOOR SCHEDULE (HARDWARE): REVIEW ALL DOOR HARDWARE TO ENSURE EXIT DOORS ARE FURNISHED WITH PROPER PANIC HARDWARE PER THE DOOR HARDWARE SET #. 17. SHEET A6.2; SECTION 2: INDICATE STEEL BEAM AT ROOF. 18. SHEET A6.4; SHEET TITLE: CHANGE TO WALL SECTIONS 5 & 6. 19. SHEET S1.0 (FOOTING SCHEDULE); CALCULATIONS PAGE 62: REINFORCEMENT FOR THE FOOTING INDICATED ON THE DRAWINGS (8-#5 @ BOTTOM EA. WAY) DOES NOT AGREE WITH THE CALCULATIONS (8-#6). VERIFY. 20. CALCULATIONS SHEET G15: THE BEAM IS CALLED OUT IN 'TITLE' AS A 16X4X3/8, BUT IS ACTUALLY CALCULATED FOR A 16X4X5/16 (O.3125) AS INDICATED ON THE PLAN. VERIFY. 21. SHEET S2.0; SECTION 24/SD-2 AT BREAK AREA ON SOUTH WALL: SHOULD THIS BE 23/SD-2? VERIFY. 22. SHEET SD-1 (DETAILS 1 AND 2); CALCULATIONS: THE DETAILS INDICATE THE 4X10 WOOD LEDGER AT THE ROOF WITH 2-3/4" DIAMETER ANCHOR BOLTS AT 24" O.C. MINIMUM, WHILE THE CALCULATIONS INDICATE 2-3/4" DIAMETER ANCHOR BOLTS AT 16" O.C. CLARIFY. 23. SHEET A1.0 (SITE PLAN NOTE 46); SHEET A1.2 (DETAIL 12): DETAIL 12 INDICATES THE RETAINING WALL FOOTING PER STRUCTURAL. NO DESIGN CALCULATIONS OR DETAILS FOR THE TILT-UP WALL PANEL OR FOOTING WAS LOCATED IN STRUCTURAL. CLARIFY. 24. SHEET A1.0 (SITE PLAN NOTE 16); SHEET A1.1 (DETAIL 20): DETAIL 20 INDICATES THE SITE WALL FOOTING PER STRUCTURAL. NO DESIGN CALCULATIONS OR DETAILS FOR THE MASONRY WALL OR FOOTING WAS LOCATED IN STRUCTURAL. CLARIFY. 25. SHEET SD-1; DETAIL 7: IS THE 3/8" STEEL PLATE BOLTED ON EACH SIDE OF THE BEAM SPLICE (PER THE PLATE DETAIL) OR ON ONE SIDE (PER MAIN DETAIL)? CLARIFY. 26. SHEET SD-2 (DETAIL 18); SHEET S-2.0: THE ROOF FRAMING PLAN INDICATES JOISTS AT 48" O.C. WHILE DETAIL 18 INDICATES 4'-0" CLEAR BETWEEN JOISTS. CLARIFY. 27. GENERAL: ANY DEFERRED SUBMITTALS MUST BE APPROVED BY THE BUILDING OFFICIAL. 28. GENERAL: WITH THE NEXT PLAN SUBMITTAL, PLEASE PROVIDE A RESPONSE LETTER TO ALL ITEMS LISTED IN THE PREVIOUS REVIEW. |
| 05/19/2009 | GERRY KOZIOL | WWM | REVIEW | Denied | NEED COT PERMIT FOR ON-SITE PRIVATE SEWER- NEED DEQ REVIEWOF 8" ON-SITE PRIVATE SEWER (WITH MANHOLES & PROVISIONS FOSR FUTURE SERVICE TO ADJACENT LOT)- NEED COPY OF ON-SITE PRIVATE FOR BASE MAP UPDATE. |
| 05/19/2009 | RAY MAJUTA | ELECTRICAL-COMMERCIAL | REVIEW | Approv-Cond | |
| 05/20/2009 | ROBERT SHERRY | WATER | REVIEW | Approved | |
| 05/20/2009 | LAITH ALSHAMI | ENGINEERING | REVIEW | Denied | CANNOT APPROVED BUILDING PLAN UNTIL DEVELOPMENT PACKAGE IS APPROVED |
| 05/20/2009 | STEVE SHIELDS | ZONING | REVIEW | Denied | CANNOT APPROVED BUILDING PLAN UNTIL DEVELOPMENT PACKAGE IS APPROVED |
| 05/20/2009 | ROBERT SHERRY | MECHANICAL-COMMERCIAL | REVIEW | Denied | 1. The 2006 International Mechanical Code with Local Amendments, not the 2000 International Mechanical Code (Note D, sheet M1.1), is the relevant code for this project. 2. Provide energy code compliance calculations using the correct climate zone (Pima County < 4,000 feet). Reference: Sections 101.4 and 104.2, International Energy Conservation Code 2006. 3. Specify the minimum resistance (R-value) of the duct insulation to be used on this project. Reference: Section 503.2.7, IECC 2006, as amended by the City of Tucson. 4. Revise the size of the condensate drains (HP-1 plus AC-2) in accordance with Section 307.2.1, IMC 2006, as amended by the City of Tucson. |
| 05/21/2009 | ROBERT SHERRY | PLUMBING-COMMERCIAL | REVIEW | Denied | 1. The presence of manholes in the private sewer collection system for this project mandates a review by the Pima County Department of Environmental Quality. The design for the system must be submitted to the Pima County Department of Environmental Quality for their approval prior to obtaining a permit for constructing the private sewer collection system from the City of Tucson (this permit is separate from the building permit). Reference: A.R.S. 49-104 (B) (13). 2. Coordinate the type of cleanout to be installed at the connection of the building sewer and the building drain with the civil drawings; detail H, sheet 9 of 23. Reference: Section 103.2.3, UPC 2006. 3. Clarify the type of urinals being proposed for this building. The plumbing fixture schedule specifies water-free urinals but calls out 1-1/4" water supplies for the urinals and the water schematic also shows branch piping to the urinals. Water-free urinals are not Code-compliant fixtures per the 2006 UPC. If water-free urinals are desired, submit an appeal to the Building Official requesting approval to utilize water-free urinals based on the 2006 International Plumbing Code. Reference: Sections 103.2.3, 211.0 (insanitary), 301.2, 405.2, 409.0, 601.1, and 1005.0, UPC 2006. 4. Show that the backflow preventer located in room 109 conforms to the access and clearance requirements of Section 603.3.4, UPC 2006. 5. One of the specified fixtures (Zurn water closet) requires a minimum pressure greater than the 15-PSI used in the water pipe sizing calculations. Revise calculations as necessary. Reference: Section 608.1, UPC 2006. 6. Provide upper terminal cleanouts on horizontal drainage pipes exceeding 5 feet in length (horizontal drain lines serving sinks and urinals require cleanouts regardless of length). Reference: Section 707.4, UPC 2006. 7. Provide cleanouts sized per Section 707.11, UPC 2006 (see rooms 105 and 106 and the floor cleanout in corridor 203). 8. The rim elevation of the next upstream sanitary manhole (2580.1') is less than 12" below the first floor elevation (2581'). Provide a backwater valve per Sections 710.1, UPC 2006, as amended by the City of Tucson. 9. Provide vent piping of sufficient size to comply with Section 904.1, UPC 2006. Vents located upstream from pumps, ejectors, backwater valves, or other devices that obstruct the free flow of gases between the building sewer and the outside atmosphere shall not be used for meeting the required cross-sectional vent area. 10. Provide the roof drainage design noted on sheets A5.0 (keynote 08) and A5.1 (detail 2). Reference: Sections 103.2.3, 1101.11, 1102.0, 1105.0, and 1106.0, UPC 2006. 11. Show the slope of the horizontal rainwater pipes on the plans. Reference: Section 1106.2, UPC 2006. 12. Clarify the terminations of the roof drains and the overflow drains. Reference: Sections 103.2.3 and 1101.11.2.2.1, UPC 2006. |
Final Status
| Task End Date | Reviewer's Name | Type of Review | Description |
|---|---|---|---|
| 05/22/2009 | GERARDO BONILLA | OUT TO CUSTOMER | Completed |
| 05/22/2009 | SUE REEVES | REJECT SHELF | Completed |