Permit Review Detail
Review Status: Completed
Review Details: SITE
Permit Number - T09CM01102
Review Name: SITE
Review Status: Completed
| Review Date | Reviewer's Name | Type of Review | Description | Status | Comments |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 05/11/2009 | DAVE MANN | FIRE | REVIEW | Approved | |
| 05/11/2009 | RONALD BROWN | ZONING HC SITE | REVIEW | Approved | |
| 05/11/2009 | STEVE SHIELDS | ZONING | REVIEW | Denied | DSD TRANSMITTAL FROM: Steve Shields Lead Planner PROJECT: 114 E. Rillito Street T09CM01102 Site Plan (1st Review) TRANSMITTAL DATE: May 11, 2009 COMMENTS: Please resubmit revised drawings and a response letter, which states how all Zoning Review Section comments regarding the Land Use Code and Development Standards were addressed. 1. This site plan was reviewed for compliance with the City of Tucson Development Standards (D.S.) and Land Use Code (LUC) for full code compliance. 2. As it appears that there is some new development planned for the southern end of parcel 115-05-167A provide a copy of the last approved site plan for this parcel. 3. Based on the most current aerial photos it appears that this project will block access to parcel 115-05-1680. Provide a copy of the last approved site plan for parcel 115-05-1680 so that zoning can verify that access to required parking is not being eliminated. 4. As it appears that parcel 115-05-167A will be utilizing parcel 115-05-169B for parking and pedestrian circulation is proposed between the two parcels provide either a lot combination or a copy of a cross assess and parking agreement. This agreement should cover pedestrian and vehicle access and parking. 5. For clarity remove all landscape from the site plan. 6. D.S. 2-02.2.1.A.6 The street perimeter yard setback shown under "REQ. ZONING INFORMATION, PERIMETER YARD DD" is not correct. This parcel would be considered "DEVELOPED AREA" therefore the required street perimeter yard setback would be 20'-0" or 1 ½ the height of the exterior wall of the proposed building. Zoning acknowledges that the proposed building will meet the required setback. 7. D.S. 2-02.2.1.A.8 Per D.S. 3-05.2.1.3 the vehicle parking space shown directly north of the refuse enclosure is required to be 10'-0" wide. 8. D.S. 2-02.2.1.A.9 Show the required 5'-0" access aisle on detail 10/SI-02, see D.S. 2-09.5.2. 9. D.S. 2-02.2.1.A.10 As a future curb is shown on the plan show the future sight visibility triangles (SVTs) on the plan. 10. D.S. 2-02.2.1.A.12 Provide a dimension from the back of spurs, one located at the east end of the parking area and one located at the south end of parcel 115-05-167A, to the fence shown on the plan. Per D.S. 3-05.2.2.D the minimum distance is three (3) feet. 11. D.S. 2-02.2.1.A.13 If applicable show the location, type, size, and height of existing and proposed signage on the site plan. 12. D.S. 2-02.2.1.A.14 The proposed 12x50 loading space shown on the plan does not meet the requirements of LUC Section 3.4.5.2, this loading space should be 12x55. 13. D.S. 2-02.2.1.A.14 It does not appear that sufficient maneuvering area is provided for the loading space, demonstrate the vehicle maneuvering on the plan. 14. D.S. 2-02.2.1.A.19 Please clarify why you are showing a future right-of-way and future curb on the plan. 15. D.S. 2-02.2.1.A.20 If applicable show all easements of record graphically on the plan along with the recordation information, docket and page. 16. D.S. 2-02.2.1.A.25 If applicable show all existing and proposed site lighting layout and type on the site plan. 17. D.S. 2-02.2.1.A.32 Provide documentation from Environmental Services that approves the location of the refuse enclosure. 18. D.S. 2-02.2.A.4 Zoning acknowledges all the vehicle parking information on the site plan but was not able to locate the required number of vehicle parking spaces. Provide the number required and provided in the same location on the plan. 19. D.S. 2-02.2.A.4 Zoning acknowledges all the bicycle parking information on the site plan but was not able to locate the required number of bicycle parking spaces. Provide the number required and provided in the same location on the plan. 20. D.S. 2-02.2.A.5 Provide the required number of loading spaces on the site plan near the provided number of loading spaces. 21. Depending on how the above comments are addressed addition comments may be forth coming. If you have any questions about this transmittal, please contact me at Steve.Shields@tucsonaz.gov or (520) 837-4956. C:\planning\site\t09cm01102 RESUBMITTAL OF THE FOLLOWING IS REQUIRED: Revised site plan and additional requested documents. |
| 05/12/2009 | JASON GREEN | ENGINEERING | REVIEW | Denied | DATE: May 12, 2009 SUBJECT: 114 E Rillito Street Site Plan- Engineering Review TO: J.A.C.A Design, LLC LOCATION: T14S R13E Sec01 Ward 3 REVIEWERS: Jason Green, CFM ACTIVITY: T09CM01102 (Site Plan) SUMMARY: Engineering Division of Development Services Department has received and reviewed the site plan (T09CM01102) and unsealed Hydrologic/Hydraulic Report (Stanley Engineering & Drainage, Inc.) for the above referenced property. Engineering Division does not recommend approval of the site plan at this time. The following items need to be addressed: SITE PLAN COMMENTS: 1) DS Sec.10-02: The site plan submittal did not include a signed and sealed Hydrologic/Hydraulic Report from a civil engineer. The site plan can not be fully reviewed until a sealed and signed HH Report is submitted for review showing all proposed drainage infrastructure and that the site plan conforms to the proposed HH Report. 2) DS Sec.2-02.2.1.A: Revise the site plan sheet to remove all proposed landscaping and unnecessary shading. All shaded symbols must be clearly labeled and any symbol used must be shown in the legend. The symbols used for landscaping must be removed from the site plan for clarity. 3) DS Sec.2-02.2.1.A.8: Revise the site plan to show a minimum unobstructed radius of 5 feet that is required at PAAL intersections, unless the PAAL is designated as a fire lane or access for refuse collection then a minimum unobstructed radius of 18 feet is required per DS Sec.3-05.2.1.3.b. 4) DS Sec.2-02.2.1.A.12: Revise the site plan and Keynote #13 to show that all proposed offsite handicap access ramps within the public right-of-way meet the design requirements per the public standard detail #207 (and the proposed grading plan sheet). Provide details and minimum slope requirements at all transitions from pedestrian circulation to vehicular circulation. 5) DS Sec.2-02.2.1.A.12: Refer to comments from Ron Brown, RA Structural Plans Examiner for all onsite handicap and ANSI Standard requirements that apply to this project. 6) DS Sec.2-02.2.1.A.14: Clarify on the site plan the maneuverability for the proposed loading zone as shown. It appears that the landscape planter might be in conflict. Refer to AASHTO for the national standards for turning radii. 7) DS Sec.2-02.2.1.A.16: Revise the site plan to label all proposed flow arrows onsite to verify stormwater drainage from the vehicular use area, roof drainage, etc. to be in conformance with the proposed Hydrologic/Hydraulic Report. 8) DS Sec.2-02.2.1.A.16: Revise the site plan and all proposed areas of water harvesting to meet the requirements within the HH Report and the proposed grading plan. Provide a note on the site plan that states "Water Harvesting Areas to be depressed a minimum of 6-inches per "City of Tucson Water Harvesting Guidance Manual, Ordinance # 10210." Keynote #28 conflicts with the overall proposed drainage scheme for the site, clarify. 9) DS Sec.2-02.2.1.A.21: Clarify on the site plan the existing and/or proposed curb location within the public right-of-way. Verify if the existing curb is to remain or if a new curb is to be constructed for this project. 10) DS Sec.2-02.2.1.A.27: Provide a General Note stating that all fences or walls will require a separate permit for review and approval by all necessary Development Services Departments. 11) DS Sec.2-02.2.1.A.32: Provide approval from Andy Vera, Environmental Services, Andy.Vera@tucsonaz.gov to verify that refuse collection is acceptable to the Environmental Services Department at the proposed location. 12) DS Sec.2-02.2.1.A.32: Revise the site plan to verify the maneuverability, label and dimension the required 36-foot and 50-foot radii for the refuse container; clearly label these in plan view. Provide the required 14-foot by 40-foot clear approach. Refer to DS Sec.6-01 for all refuse requirements. 13) Review and approval from TDOT Permits and Codes for all improvements within the public right-of-way will be required. A right-of-way use permit application will be required prior to construction. Refer to the following links for TDOT Forms and applications: a) http://www.tucsonaz.gov/dsd/Forms_Fees___Maps/Applications/applications.html / b) http://www.dot.ci.tucson.az.us/engineering/pia.php c) Or contact Thad Harvison at 837-6592 for all additional questions regarding r-o-w. 14) Be advised that further comments may be forth coming on resubmittal of the site plan. GRADING PLAN: 1) A grading permit application (T09BU00642) has been submitted for this project and comments will be posted under that activity for grading plan review comments. A grading permit may not be issued prior to site plan approval. 15) Please ensure that any future grading plan will be consistent with the site plan and HH Report. Grading standards may be accessed at: http://www.ci.tucson.az.us/dsd/DevStandsTOC.pdf GENERAL COMMENTS: Please provide a revised site plan that addresses the comments provided above. Include a comprehensive response letter addressing in detail responses to all of the above comments. Enclose "redlines" with the resubmittal package. Further comments may be generated upon resubmittal of the site plan review. For questions, or to schedule an appointment, I can be reached at 837-4929. Jason Green, CFM Senior Engineer Associate Engineering Division COT Development Services |
| 05/19/2009 | ANDREW CONNOR | NPPO | REVIEW | Approved | Exception |
| 05/19/2009 | ANDREW CONNOR | LANDSCAPE | REVIEW | Denied | 1. A 6' wall is required to screen loading zone from street frontage LUC 3.7.2-I 2. The planting plan and layout calculations will include the following Information: " Red Bird of Paradise (Caesalpinia pulcherrima) is considered a shrub, and Peruvian Verbena (Verbena peruviana) is a ground cover, revise-planting plan as necessary. " Shrubs in areas of required landscaping other than for opaque screening will be a minimum one (1) gallon container size, with twenty (20) percent of the required number to be five (5) gallon container size or larger DS 2-06.3.5.F All coverage plants are indicated as 1gal. 3. The site plan and landscape plan must show identical site layout to avoid conflict between the two plans. Ensure that all changes to the site plan are reflected on the landscape plan. 4. Additional comments may apply. 5. Re-submittal of all plans is required. |
| 05/22/2009 | ROBERT SHERRY | PLUMBING-COMMERCIAL | REVIEW | Denied | 1. Designing the site plumbing constitutes the practice of engineering. Provide plans sealed by an Arizona Registrant. Reference Arizona Revised Statutes 32-125, Board of Technical Registration Rules R4-30-304. 2. Provide the rim elevation of the next upstream cleanout. Reference: Section 710.1, UPC 2006, as amended by the City of Tucson. 3. Clarify the two keynote #3 entries. Reference: Section 103.2.3, UPC 2006. 4. The water service and irrigation piping shall not be located beneath the electrical service transformer. Reference: Section 101.5.2, UPC 2006. |
Final Status
| Task End Date | Reviewer's Name | Type of Review | Description |
|---|---|---|---|
| 06/05/2009 | CPIERCE1 | OUT TO CUSTOMER | Completed |
| 06/05/2009 | SUE REEVES | REJECT SHELF | Completed |