Microfiche records prior to 2006 have not been completely digitized and may not be available yet on PRO. If you can not find what you are looking for please submit a records request.

Permit Review Detail

Permit Number: T09CM01041
Parcel: 105095510

Address:
4701 N STONE AV

Review Status: Completed

Review Details: RESUBMITTAL - SITE ALL

Permit Number - T09CM01041
Review Name: RESUBMITTAL - SITE ALL
Review Status: Completed
Review Date Reviewer's Name Type of Review Description Status Comments
07/10/2009 STEVE SHIELDS ZONING REVIEW Denied DSD TRANSMITTAL

FROM: Steve Shields
Lead Planner

PROJECT: SAM's Club Remodel
T09CM01041
Site Plan (2nd Review)

TRANSMITTAL DATE: July 10, 2009

COMMENTS: Please resubmit revised drawings and a response letter, which states how all Zoning Review Section comments regarding the Land Use Code and Development Standards were addressed.

1. This site plan was reviewed for compliance with the City of Tucson Development Standards (D.S.) and Land Use Code (LUC) for full code compliance for all areas of expansion and/or restriping of existing parking.

2. D.S. 2-02.2.1.A.12 Sheet C-6 indicates and area along the main entrance of the building that the sidewalk is flush with the vehicle use area. Per D.S. 2-08.4.1 Sidewalks within a project must be physically separated from any vehicle travel lane by means of curbing, grade separation, barriers, railing, or other means. This said Zoning acknowledges that bollards are called out for a portion of the area where the sidewalk is flush with the pavement on Sheet SP2. The entire area that the sidewalk is flush with the pavement is required to be physically separated. Show the proposed bollards on the civil site plan.

3. This comment was not fully addressed. Provide the docket and page for all easements shown on the plan. D.S. 2-02.2.1.A.20 If applicable show all easements of record graphically on the plan along with the recordation information, docket and page.

4. Depending on how the above comments are addressed addition comments may be forth coming.

If you have any questions about this transmittal, please contact me at Steve.Shields@tucsonaz.gov or (520) 837-4956.

C:\planning\site\t09cm01041

RESUBMITTAL OF THE FOLLOWING IS REQUIRED: Revised site plan and additional requested documents.
07/10/2009 RONALD BROWN ZONING HC SITE REVIEW Denied 10 JULY 2009
T09CM01041/SAM'S AT 4701 N. STONE AV.
REVIEWED BY RON BROWN

SITE ACCESSIBILITY CODE REVIEW-RESUBMITTAL
2006 IBC/ICC ANSI 117.1

DENIED: SEE COMMENTS BELOW

A. As per Development Standards, all lettering is to be 1/8".
RESUBMITTAL COMMENTS:
1. THE DEVELOPMENT STANDARDS HAVE BEEN MODIFIED TO ALLOW A MINIMUM FONT SIZE FOR BOTH UPPER AND LOWER CASE, OF 3/32". SHEETS THAT DO NOT MEET THIS REQUIREMENT ARE CS, CA2, CA3 AND CA4. PLEASE CORRECT THESE SHEETS TO THE MINIMUM FONT SIZE OF 3/32" OR LARGER.

B. Please provide a site plan showing all the accessible parking changes combined with the modified front entry and all associated accessible route changes and code compliances.
RESUBMITTAL COMMENTS
1. OK
C. As per ICC/ANSI 117.1, a marked crossing is "A crosswalk or other identified path intended for pedestrian use in crossing a vehicular way." In conjunction with Section 406.12 "Marked crossings that are raised to the same level as the adjoining sidewalk shall be preceded by a 24-inch (610 mm) deep detectable warning complying with Section 705, extending the full width of the marked crossing and Section 406.14 "Where detectable warnings are provided on curb ramps or at raised marked crossings leading to islands or cut-through medians, the island or cut-through median shall also be provided with detectable warnings complying with Section 705, are 24 inches (610 mm) in depth, and extend the full width of the pedestrian route or cut-through." A marked crossing is to be preceded by and terminated with a Detectable Warning. This provides for a detectable and safe passage for visually impaired persons to cross a vehicle way, PAAL, and is required by code as part of an accessible route to the accessible entrance of a building from all accessible parking spaces.
1. Please provide a marked crossing as defined above, for each group of newly modified accessible spaces shown on sheet C-7 to the accessible route at the front entrance of the building. Island cut throughs will be required for each accessible route.
RESUBMITTAL COMMENTS:
a. THE THREE GROUPS OF ACCESSIBLE PARKING REQUIRE THREE MARKED CROSSINGS AS CLEARLY DEFINED ABOVE IN COMMENT "C". PLEASE PROVIDE ALL NECESSARY MARKED CROSSINGS WITH DETECTABLE WARNINGS AS REQUIRED, SHEETS C-3 THROUGH C-7 AND LARGE SCALE PARKING DETAIL ON SHEET C-9A.

2. As per plan on Sheet C-5 and large scale plans on sheet C-9A, the space between each group of accessible parking does not meet minimum standards. This area is required by code to be an accessible route and as per zoning requirements is to be a minimum of 4' wide and constructed of concrete. The parking signs are to be located just outside the required parking area. The signage mounting shall not reduce the 4' wide accessible route requirement. Reference Zoning comments.
RESUBMITTAL COMMENTS:
a. MODIFICATIONS SHOWN ON LARGE SCALE PARKING DETAIL ON SHEET C-9A IS OK FOR ACCESSIBILITY HOWEVER ZONING WILL REQUIRE CONCRETE WHEEL STOPS. REFERENCE ZONING COMMENTS.

3. Shown on Details 1/SP-2 and 1/A1 but deleted from detail 1/A5.1 and all civil site drawings, is a 3' wide, Detectable Warning strip around the newly remodeled entry vestibule only. It does not surround the remodeled exit vestibule or the remodeled cart storage area. Please clarify the purpose for this strip because it is not required by the building code, the accessible code and COT development standards. It is non compliant with ICC/ANSI 117.1 because it does not allow for a marked crossing with detectable warnings as defined above in Paragraph "B". The zoning code does accept the bollards at a minimum of 8' o.c. as meeting the requirements for an accessible route and a vehicle way separation. Please reference Zoning comments.
RESUBMITTAL COMMENTS:
a. CHANGING THE TRUNCATED DOMES TO 6 X 6 PRESSED CONCRETE SQUARES IS ACCEPTABLE TO THIS ACCESSIBLE REVIEWER, HOWEVER ICC/ANSI DICTATES A DETECTABLE WARNING TO BE TRUNCATED DOMES. PLEASE REFER TO THE BAND OF 6X6 SQUARES SOMETHING OTHER THAN A "DETECTABLE WARNING".
b. THE CIVIL DRAWINGS SHOW THE ACCESSIBLE ROUTE BEING FLUSH WITH THE PAAL EXTENDING MUCH FURTHER SOUTH THAN THE AREA SHOW FOR BOLLARD PLACEMENT. THE BOLLARDS MAY HAVE TO EXTEND FURTHER SOUTH WITH THE FLUSH AREA SHOWN ON CIVIL DRAWINGS. REFERENCE ZONING COMMENTS.

4. Please provide all required curb and/or sidewalk ramps as per 2006 IBC, ICC/ANSI 117.1, Sections 405 and/or 406.
RESUBMITTAL COMMENTS:
a. OK
D. On Sheet C-9A, large scale plans,
1. No angled accessible parking is shown on the site plan.
RESUBMITTAL COMMENTS:
a. OK

2. Generic large scale plans are not acceptable. Please show actual parking design layout as depicted on the site plan.
RESUBMITTAL COMMENTS:
a. OK
ADDITIONAL RESUBMITTAL COMMENTS:
1. AT THE LARGE SCALE ACCESSIBLE PARKING DETAIL ON SHEET C-9A
a. PLEASE CHANGE THE TRUCNCATED DOME BAND SYMBOL AROUND THE FRONT ENTRANCE TO A 6 X 6 SQUARE TEXTURE BAND AS REQUIRED BY THE ARCHITECTURAL PLANS.
a. PROVIDE MARKED CROSSINGS (ONE FOR EACH ACCESSIBLE PARKING GROUP) AND TRUNCATED DOMES AT THE FRONT ENTRANCE END OF THE MARKED CROSSINGS AS PER COMMENT 2 ABOVE.

END OF REVIEW
07/13/2009 DAVE MANN FIRE REVIEW Approved
07/15/2009 BIANCA RAMIREZ ENGINEERING REVIEW Denied DATE: July 15, 2009
SUBJECT: SAM"s Club Remodel (Site Plan)
TO: Metro Permits
LOCATION: 4701 N Stone Ave, T13S, R13E, Section 24, Ward 3
REVIEWERS: Bianca Ramirez, CFM
ACTIVITY: T09CM01041 (2nd Review)



RESUBMITTAL REQUIRED: Site Plan

SUMMARY: Engineering Division of Development Services Department has received and reviewed the proposed site plan for the above referenced property. Engineering Division does not recommend approval of the site plan at this time. Please address the following review comments prior to the next submittal.

Please include a response letter to the comments along with the corrected copies of the SP.

Site Plan:

1. Complied
2. Please revise location map to meet minimum requirements as follows, per D.S. 2-02.2.1.4.
A. A small project location map shall be drawn on the first sheet of the site plan, preferably in the upper right corner. The map should cover approximately one (1) square mile, be drawn at a minimum of 3" = 1 mile, and provide the following information:
B. Show the subject property approximately centered within the one (1) square mile area.
C. Identify conditions within the square mile area, such as major streets and watercourses.
D. Section, Township, and range; section corners; north arrow; and scale will be labeled.
3. Complied
4. Label existing and future sight visibility triangles per D.S. 2-02.2.1.10.
5. Complied
6. Complied.
7. Complied
8. Complied
9. DS Sec.2.02.2.1.A.16: Provide drainage arrows and locations of all concentration points. Specifically show roof down spout locations from proposed buildings at pedestrian circulation areas. A detail for the dimension of the proposed scuppers that are used for collecting onsite roof drainage at all pedestrian sidewalk is required; refer to City of Tucson details. Any scuppers proposed under the sidewalk will be designed and constructed to convey the 10-year flood flow. Provide a drainage statement showing scupper calculations that demonstrate that the 10-year flood flow is contained under the sidewalk.
10. Complied
11. DS Sec. 2-05.2.4.H.2: Provide the right-of-way (ROW) recordation information for Stone Ave. (I-87-035)
12. DS Sec.2-02.2.1.A.19: If applicable label the future sidewalk and curb area on the site plan to verify that all existing and future improvements will be located outside of the future ROW. Right of Way map indicates that Stone have 120' ROW.
13. Verify that all easement of record have been graphically shown on the plan together with recording docket and page per D.S. 2-02.2.1.20.
14. Complied
15. Complied
19. Verify that all fences, walls, or vegetation for screening and sight visibility have been called out by type, material, height, location and spacing per D.S. 2-02.2.1.27.
20. Complied
21. Complied
22. Additional comments may be forthcoming.

If you have any questions, I can be reached at 837-4928 or Bianca.Ramirez@tucsonaz.gov

Bianca C. Ramirez
Engineering Associate
City of Tucson/Development Services Department
201 N. Stone Avenue
P.O. Box 27210
Tucson, Arizona 85726-7210
(520) 837-4928 office
(520) 879-8010 fax
07/24/2009 RICK MYERS PLUMBING-COMMERCIAL REVIEW Denied 1. Provide sufficient information to evaluate the need for backwater valves. The first floor elevation must be at least twelve inches above the rim elevation of the next upstream manhole. Reference 710.1 2006 UPC as ammended by the City of Tucson.

Final Status

Task End Date Reviewer's Name Type of Review Description
09/16/2009 CINDY AGUILAR OUT TO CUSTOMER Completed
09/16/2009 SUE REEVES REJECT SHELF Completed