Microfiche records prior to 2006 have not been completely digitized and may not be available yet on PRO. If you can not find what you are looking for please submit a records request.

Permit Review Detail

Permit Number: T09CM01041
Parcel: 105095510

Address:
4701 N STONE AV

Review Status: Completed

Review Details: RESUBMITTAL

Permit Number - T09CM01041
Review Name: RESUBMITTAL
Review Status: Completed
Review Date Reviewer's Name Type of Review Description Status Comments
07/10/2009 RONALD BROWN ZONING HC SITE REVIEW Denied REFERENCE BUILDING COMMENTS
07/10/2009 RONALD BROWN BUILDING-COMMERCIAL REVIEW Denied 10 JULY 2009
T09CM01041/SAM'S AT 4701 N. STONE AV.
REVIEWED BY RON BROWN

BUILDING CODE REVIEW
2006 IBC/ICC ANSI 117.1

DENIED: SEE COMMENTS BELOW

A. General:
1. For all Owner/Contractor supplied casework, counters and etc., insure accessibility compliance with 2006 IBC, Chapter 11 and ICC/ANSI 117.1.
RESUBMITTAL COMMENT:
a. OK

B. As per Development Services Department standards, all lettering is to be a minimum of 3/32", all capitals. Please correct any and all drawings.
RESUBMITTAL COMMENTS:
1. SHEETS THAT DO NOT MEET THIS REQUIREMENT ARE CS, CA2, CA3 AND CA4. PLEASE CORRECT THESE SHEETS TO THE MINIMUM FONT SIZE OF 3/32" OR LARGER.
C. DETAILS 1/SP-2 AND 1/A-1: Please remove the detectable strip surrounding the front entry vestibule. It is non compliant with ICC/ANSI 117.1 because it does not allow for a marked crossing with detectable warnings as defined in sections 106.5, 406.12 and 406.14. The zoning code does accept the bollards at a minimum of 8' o.c. as meeting the requirements for an accessible route and a vehicle way separation. Please reference Zoning comments.
RESUBMITTAL COMMENT:
a. CHANGE IS OK WITH ACCESSIBILITY HOWEVER, ZONING MAY REQUIRED BOLLARD EXTENSION SOUTH ALONG WITH FLUSH ACCESSIBLE ROUTE AND PAAL AREA SHOWN ON THE CIVIL DRAWINGS.

D. DETAIL 1/A5:
1. Door 112A needs 18" clearance on strike jamb side, Section 404.2.3.1.
RESUBMITTAL COMMENT:
a. OK

2. Confirm that accessories 10.03 and 10.27 are compliant with Section 307, Protruding Objects, (4" max).
RESUBMITTAL COMMENT:
a. OK

E. Details 2/A5.1 and 2/A5.5:
1. The new water fountain must have accessible clearance as defined by Section 602.2. The bollards shown do not allow the space on detail 2/A5.1 and the space is not there for detail 2/A5.5.
RESUBMITTAL COMMENT:
a. OK

2. Confirm that accessories 10.03 in the Unisex and Receiving Toilet Rooms are compliant with Section 307, Protruding Objects, (4" max).
RESUBMITTAL COMMENT:
a. OK

F. Details 2 and 6/A5.2: Insure vertical grab bar is indicated as per Section 604.5.1.
RESUBMITTAL COMMENT:
a. OK

G. Detail 1/A5.7: Provide 18" clearance at strike jamb of door 152A as required by Section 404.2.3.1 (a).
RESUBMITTAL COMMENT:
a. DO YOU NOT HIRE PEOPLE WITH DISABILITIES?

H. At Detail 4/A.6: Show bracing connection to structure above and detail existing structure.
RESUBMITTAL COMMENT:
a. OK
I. Sheet A/8, Door Schedule: No hardware schedule.
RESUBMITTAL COMMENT:
a. OK
J. Detail 1/TBC1:
1. This toilet is non-compliant as an accessible toilet. As per Section 604.3, the lavatory cannot intrude into required toilet clearance space. Redesign toilet accordingly.
RESUBMITTAL COMMENT:
a. OK
2. Provide an 18" clearance at strike jamb.
RESUBMITTAL COMMENT:
a. OK
K. Wall behind exhaust hood must be non-combustible, reference mechanical comments.
RESUBMITTAL COMMENT:
a. REFERENCE DETAIL NOS. 2AG1.1 AND 3/M3.1: MECHANICAL DRAWINGS SHOW STAINLESS STEEL BACK/SIDE SPLASH SUPPORTED BY AN EXISTING WALL. THE ARCHITECTURAL DETAIL SHOWS A LINE THAT IS PROBABLY THE STAINLESS STEEL BACKSPLASH A COUPLE INCHES FROM A NEW COOLER PANEL WALL. THERE IS NO EXISTING WALL FOR THE STAINLESS STEEL BACKSPLASH. PLEASE PROVIDE A NEW DETAIL SHOWING A NON COMBUSTABLE WALL SUPPORT FOR THE REQUIRED STAINLESS STEEL SIDE/BACK SPLASH.

L. Detail 1/PH1: Door 300D needs 18" clearance on strike jamb side, Section 404.2.3.1.
RESUBMITTAL COMMENT:
a. OK

END OF REVIEW
07/10/2009 STEVE SHIELDS ZONING REVIEW Denied DSD TRANSMITTAL

FROM: Steve Shields
Lead Planner

PROJECT: SAM's Club Remodel
T09CM01041
Building Plan (1st Review)

TRANSMITTAL DATE: May 20, 2009

1. The building plan has been reviewed by Zoning Review Section but cannot approve the plan until all zoning comments or concerns have been addressed.

2. Zoning could not verify that the building plan was in compliance with the approved site plan.. Please submit two copies of the approved and stamped site plan with the next building plan submittal.

3. Zoning will re-review the building plan on the next submittal to insure compliance with the approved and stamped site plan. Additional comments may be forthcoming.

If you have any questions about this transmittal, please contact me at Steve.Shields@tucsonaz.gov or (520) 837-4956

C:\planning\grading\t09cm01041.doc

RESUBMITTAL OF THE FOLLOWING IS REQUIRED:
07/13/2009 DAVE MANN FIRE REVIEW Approved
07/15/2009 BIANCA RAMIREZ ENGINEERING REVIEW Denied DSD TRANSMITTAL

FROM: Bianca Ramirez, CFM
Engineering Associate

PROJECT: SAM's Club Remodel
T09CM01041
Building Plan (2nd Review)

TRANSMITTAL DATE: July 15, 2009

1. The building plan has been reviewed by Engineering Review Section but cannot approve the plan until all comments and/or concerns on the site plan have been addressed.

2. Engineering will re-review the building plan on the next submittal to insure compliance with the approved and stamped site plan.

3. Unable to approve building plans until site plan has been approved.

4. Additional comments may be forthcoming.

If you have any questions about this transmittal, please contact me at bianca.ramirez@tucsonaz.gov or (520) 837-4928.
07/24/2009 RICK MYERS PLUMBING-COMMERCIAL REVIEW Denied 1. Hub drains are not approved/listed indirect waste receptacles. Reference 301.1.1 2006 UPC: Each floor drain is to have a listing. 804.1: Shall be approved for the use proposed. 411.0: Floor drains shall be considered plumbing fixtures, and each such drain shall be provided with an approved type of strainer, having a waterway equivalent to the area of the tailpiece. Floor drains shall be of an approved type, suitably flanged to offer a water tight joint in the floor.
07/31/2009 RAY MAJUTA ELECTRICAL-COMMERCIAL REVIEW Denied Project; 4701 N Stone Av
Sam's TI < Power,Lighting,Eqmpt Remodel
T09CM01041

The Electrical Plans have been denied for the following;

1. Sheet E1.1 , note # 16.129 indicates on the Front Office/Restroom Lighting Plan , 3 circuits previously used in the area are to be reused for new fixtures. Indicate on the plan which circuits are to be used and indicate circuit # and Panel and load, as requested on item # 6 last plan check.
2. Sheet E1.2 , Front Mezzanine Light Plan, 2 lighting circuits to be reused, indicate circuit #'s , Panel and loads. As requested on item # 6 last plan check.
3. Sheet E1.4 , Grocery/Receiving Lighting Plan, indicate circuit #'s Panel and loads.
4. Sheet 2.2, Circuit L1B2-27 used twice , circuit L1B2-29 used in power plan but spare in panel schedule, circuit L1B2-33used in power plan but spare in panel schedule.
5. Sheet E2.3 , LFE receptacles in office not labeled as per circuits.
6. Sheet E2.4 , LDE2 receptacles bakery not labeled, LDE1-14 on power plan not on panel schedule. LDE1-40 on power plan as receptacle (120v), on panel schedule shown as part of a 2 pole Pizza cooler ?
7. Sheet RE1 , circuit LPR-84 on power plan goes to MTA-6, panel schedule shows a 2 pole Handi-wrap circuit.
8. Sheet RE1, list circuits to be reused as per note 16.957 for MTA-1,2,9,10, as requested on item 6 last plan check.
9. Sheet RE1, Refrigeration Electrical plans show circuits CHL-13,15 also CHA-19,21,23,25,as new circuits, Panel Schedule not shown.



Ray T Majuta, Elect Plan Ck
PDSD City Of Tucson
8/02/09
Ray.Majuta@tucsonaz.gov

Final Status

Task End Date Reviewer's Name Type of Review Description
09/16/2009 CINDY AGUILAR OUT TO CUSTOMER Completed
09/16/2009 SUE REEVES REJECT SHELF Completed