Microfiche records prior to 2006 have not been completely digitized and may not be available yet on PRO. If you can not find what you are looking for please submit a records request.
Permit Review Detail
Review Status: Completed
Review Details: SITE
Permit Number - T09CM01041
Review Name: SITE
Review Status: Completed
| Review Date | Reviewer's Name | Type of Review | Description | Status | Comments |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 05/11/2009 | RBROWN1 | ADA | REVIEW | Passed | NOT A COT OWNED/OPERATED PROPERTY |
| 05/12/2009 | DAVE MANN | FIRE | REVIEW | Needs Review | |
| 05/12/2009 | RONALD BROWN | ZONING HC SITE | REVIEW | Denied | 13 MAY 2009 T09CM01041/SAM'S AT 4701 N. STONE AV. REVIEWED BY RON BROWN SITE ACCESSIBILITY CODE REVIEW 2006 IBC/ICC ANSI 117.1 DENIED: SEE COMMENTS BELOW A. As per Development Standards, all lettering is to be 1/8". B. Please provide a site plan showing all the accessible parking changes combined with the modified front entry and all associated accessible route changes and code compliances. C. As per ICC/ANSI 117.1, a marked crossing is "A crosswalk or other identified path intended for pedestrian use in crossing a vehicular way." In conjunction with Section 406.12 "Marked crossings that are raised to the same level as the adjoining sidewalk shall be preceded by a 24-inch (610 mm) deep detectable warning complying with Section 705, extending the full width of the marked crossing and Section 406.14 "Where detectable warnings are provided on curb ramps or at raised marked crossings leading to islands or cut-through medians, the island or cut-through median shall also be provided with detectable warnings complying with Section 705, are 24 inches (610 mm) in depth, and extend the full width of the pedestrian route or cut-through." A marked crossing is to be preceded by and terminated with a Detectable Warning. This provides for a detectable and safe passage for visually impaired persons to cross a vehicle way, PAAL, and is required by code as part of an accessible route to the accessible entrance of a building from all accessible parking spaces. 1. Please provide a marked crossing as defined above, for each group of newly modified accessible spaces shown on sheet C-7 to the accessible route at the front entrance of the building. Island cut throughs will be required for each accessible route. 2. As per plan on Sheet C-5 and large scale plans on sheet C-9A, the space between each group of accessible parking does not meet minimum standards. This area is required by code to be an accessible route and as per zoning requirements is to be a minimum of 4' wide and constructed of concrete. The parking signs are to be located just outside the required parking area. The signage mounting shall not reduce the 4' wide accessible route requirement. Reference Zoning comments. 3. Shown on Details 1/SP-2 and 1/A1 but deleted from detail 1/A5.1 and all civil site drawings, is a 3' wide, Detectable Warning strip around the newly remodeled entry vestibule only. It does not surround the remodeled exit vestibule or the remodeled cart storage area. Please clarify the purpose for this strip because it is not required by the building code, the accessible code and COT development standards. It is non compliant with ICC/ANSI 117.1 because it does not allow for a marked crossing with detectable warnings as defined above in Paragraph "B". The zoning code does accept the bollards at a minimum of 8' o.c. as meeting the requirements for an accessible route and a vehicle way separation. Please reference Zoning comments. 4. Please provide all required curb and/or sidewalk ramps as per 2006 IBC, ICC/ANSI 117.1, Sections 405 and/or 406. D. On Sheet C-9A, large scale plans, 1. No angled accessible parking is shown on the site plan. 2. Generic large scale plans are not acceptable. Please show actual parking design layout as depicted on the site plan. END OF REVIEW |
| 05/19/2009 | STEVE SHIELDS | ZONING | REVIEW | Denied | DSD TRANSMITTAL FROM: Steve Shields Lead Planner PROJECT: SAM's Club Remodel T09CM01041 Site Plan (1st Review) TRANSMITTAL DATE: May 20, 2009 COMMENTS: Please resubmit revised drawings and a response letter, which states how all Zoning Review Section comments regarding the Land Use Code and Development Standards were addressed. 1. This site plan was reviewed for compliance with the City of Tucson Development Standards (D.S.) and Land Use Code (LUC) for full code compliance for all areas of expansion and/or restriping of existing parking. 2. D.S. 2-02.2.1.A.2 Provide a property description (legal description) on the site plan. 3. D.S. 2-02.2.1.A.10 Show sight visibility triangles (SVTs) on the plan. 4. D.S. 2-02.2.1.A.11 Dimension all points of egress and ingress including locations and width of driveways and parking area access lanes (PAALs). As this is a parking restripe provide a fully dimensioned parking layout. 5. D.S. 2-02.2.1.A.12 The proposed handicapped signage encroaches into the required 18'-0" vehicle parking space. 6. D.S. 2-02.2.1.A.12 The access aisle located between the handicapped parking spaces is required to be a sidewalk that meets D.S.2-08.5.1.A & C. 7. D.S. 2-02.2.1.A.12 Demonstrate on the site plan how pedestrians will access the building from the proposed handicapped parking spaces. 8. D.S. 2-02.2.1.A.18 Label Stone Avenue as an MS&R route. 9. D.S. 2-02.2.1.A.20 If applicable show all easements of record graphically on the plan along with the recordation information, docket and page. 10. D.S. 2-02.2.A.4 The proposed vehicle parking does not meet the requirement of LUC Section 3.3.4 RETAIL TRADE USE GROUP, General Merchandise Sales, Motor Vehicle: SB. One (1) space per two hundred (200) sq. ft. GFA. 139,308 SQ. FT. /200 = 697 required. A Board of Adjustment for Variance may be required. Based on the last approved site plan dated 12/22/04 there were 699 vehicle parking spaces provided. 11. Depending on how the above comments are addressed addition comments may be forth coming. If you have any questions about this transmittal, please contact me at Steve.Shields@tucsonaz.gov or (520) 837-4956. C:\planning\site\t09cm01041 RESUBMITTAL OF THE FOLLOWING IS REQUIRED: Revised site plan and additional requested documents. |
| 05/27/2009 | BIANCA RAMIREZ | ENGINEERING | REVIEW | Denied | DATE: May 27, 2009 SUBJECT: SAM"s Club Remodel (Site Plan) TO: Metro Permits LOCATION: 4701 N Stone Ave, T13S, R13E, Section 24, Ward 3 REVIEWERS: Bianca Ramirez, CFM ACTIVITY: T09CM01041 (First Review) RESUBMITTAL REQUIRED: Site Plan SUMMARY: Engineering Division of Development Services Department has received and reviewed the proposed site plan for the above referenced property. Engineering Division does not recommend approval of the site plan at this time. Please address the following review comments prior to the next submittal. Please include a response letter to the comments along with the corrected copies of the SP. Site Plan: 1. Please provide property description per D.S. 2-02.2.1.2. 2. Please revise location map to meet minimum requirements as follows, per D.S. 2-02.2.1.4. A. A small project location map shall be drawn on the first sheet of the site plan, preferably in the upper right corner. The map should cover approximately one (1) square mile, be drawn at a minimum of 3" = 1mile, and provide the following information: 1. Show the subject property approximately centered within the one (1) square mile area. 2. Identify conditions within the square mile area, such as major streets and watercourses. 3. Section, Township, and range; section corners; north arrow; and scale will be labeled. 3. Please label all vehicular, bicycle, pedestrian, and handicapped circulation clearly identified per D.S. 2-02.2.1.12. 4. Label existing and future sight visibility triangles per D.S. 2-02.2.1.10. 5. D.S. 2-02.2.1.A.12 The proposed handicapped signage encroaches into the required 18'-0" vehicle parking space. 6. D.S. 2-02.2.1.A.12 The access aisle located between the handicapped parking spaces is required to be a sidewalk that meets D.S.2-08.5.1.A & C. 7. D.S. 2-02.2.1.A.12 Demonstrate on the site plan how pedestrians will access the building from the proposed handicapped parking spaces. 5. Show all points of egress and ingress including locations and width of driveways and parking area access lanes (P.A.A.L.) per D.S. 2-02.2.1.11. 6. DS Sec.2.02.2.1.A.16: Provide drainage arrows and locations of all concentration points. Specifically show roof down spout locations from proposed buildings at pedestrian circulation areas. A detail for the dimension of the proposed scuppers that are used for collecting onsite roof drainage at all pedestrian sidewalk is required; refer to City of Tucson details. Any scuppers proposed under the sidewalk will be designed and constructed to convey the 10-year flood flow. Provide a drainage statement showing scupper calculations that demonstrate that the 10-year flood flow is contained under the sidewalk. 7. Please show dimensioned right-of-way, including any applicable Major Streets and Routes (MS&R) Plan right-of-way per D.S. 2-02.2.1.19. 8. DS Sec. 2-05.2.4.H.2: Provide the right-of-way (ROW) recordation information for Stone Ave. 9. DS Sec.2-02.2.1.A.19: If applicable label the future sidewalk and curb area on the site plan to verify that all existing and future improvements will be located outside of the future ROW. 10. Verify that all easement of record have been graphically shown on the plan together with recording docket and page per D.S. 2-02.2.1.20. 11. Dimension from street monument lines to existing and proposed curbs, sidewalks, driveways, and utility lines per D.S. 2-02.2.1.21. 12. Since there in no earthmoving for the proposed repaving and a grading permit is not required. Label the existing grading plan as site plan. Information that is needed on the site plan is indicated on the plan labeled grading plan. Making it part of the site plan will ensure that the elevations needed for the site plan submittal have been met. 13. Verify that all fences, walls, or vegetation for screening and sight visibility have been called out by type, material, height, location and spacing per D.S. 2-02.2.1.27. 14. Show the site plan activity number in the lower right hand corner of each sheet per D.S. 2-02.2.1.29. 15. List the owner/developer on the plans with the pertinent information. If you have any questions, I can be reached at 837-4928 or Bianca.Ramirez@tucsonaz.gov Bianca C. Ramirez Engineering Associate City of Tucson/Development Services Department 201 N. Stone Avenue P.O. Box 27210 Tucson, Arizona 85726-7210 (520) 837-4928 office (520) 879-8010 fax |
| 06/01/2009 | PETER MCLAUGHLIN | NPPO | REVIEW | Approved | |
| 06/01/2009 | PETER MCLAUGHLIN | LANDSCAPE | REVIEW | Approved | |
| 06/02/2009 | ROBERT SHERRY | PLUMBING-COMMERCIAL | REVIEW | Denied | Provide sufficient information to evaluate the need for backwater valves for the existing building. To avoid the need for backwater valves, the first floor elevation must be at least 12" above the rim elevation of the next upstream manhole. Reference: section 710.1, UPC 2006 as amended by the City of Tucson. |
Final Status
| Task End Date | Reviewer's Name | Type of Review | Description |
|---|---|---|---|
| 07/09/2009 | DELMA ROBEY | OUT TO CUSTOMER | Completed |
| 07/09/2009 | SUE REEVES | REJECT SHELF | Completed |