Microfiche records prior to 2006 have not been completely digitized and may not be available yet on PRO. If you can not find what you are looking for please submit a records request.
Permit Review Detail
Review Status: Completed
Review Details: COMMERCIAL TI
Permit Number - T09CM01041
Review Name: COMMERCIAL TI
Review Status: Completed
| Review Date | Reviewer's Name | Type of Review | Description | Status | Comments |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 05/11/2009 | RONALD BROWN | ADA | REVIEW | Passed | NOT A COT OWNED/OPERATED PROPERTY |
| 05/12/2009 | DAVE MANN | FIRE | REVIEW | Needs Review | |
| 05/13/2009 | RONALD BROWN | BUILDING-COMMERCIAL | REVIEW | Denied | 13 MAY 2009 T09CM01041/SAM'S AT 4701 N. STONE AV. REVIEWED BY RON BROWN BUILDING CODE REVIEW 2006 IBC/ICC ANSI 117.1 DENIED: SEE COMMENTS BELOW A. General: 1. For all Owner/Contractor supplied casework, counters and etc., insure accessibility compliance with 2006 IBC, Chapter 11 and ICC/ANSI 117.1. B. As per Development Services Department standards, all lettering is to be a minimum of 3/32", all capitals. Please correct any and all drawings. C. DETAILS 1/SP-2 AND 1/A-1: Please remove the detectable strip surrounding the front entry vestibule. It is non compliant with ICC/ANSI 117.1 because it does not allow for a marked crossing with detectable warnings as defined in sections 106.5, 406.12 and 406.14. The zoning code does accept the bollards at a minimum of 8' o.c. as meeting the requirements for an accessible route and a vehicle way separation. Please reference Zoning comments. D. DETAIL 1/A5: 1. Door 112A needs 18" clearance on strike jamb side, Section 404.2.3.1. 2. Confirm that accessories 10.03 and 10.27 are compliant with Section 307, Protruding Objects, (4" max). E. Details 2/A5.1 and 2/A5.5: 1. The new water fountain must have accessible clearance as defined by Section 602.2. The bollards shown do not allow the space on detail 2/A5.1 and the space is not there for detail 2/A5.5. 2. Confirm that accessories 10.03 in the Unisex and Receiving Toilet Rooms are compliant with Section 307, Protruding Objects, (4" max). F. Details 2 and 6/A5.2: Insure vertical grab bar is indicated as per Section 604.5.1. G. Detail 1/A5.7: Provide 18" clearance at strike jamb of door 152A as required by Section 404.2.3.1 (a). H. At Detail 4/A.6: Show bracing connection to structure above and detail existing structure. I. Sheet A/8, Door Schedule: No hardware schedule. J. Detail 1/TBC1: 1. This toilet is non-compliant as an accessible toilet. As per Section 604.3, the lavatory cannot intrude into required toilet clearance space. Redesign toilet accordingly. 2. Provide an 18" clearance at strike jamb. K. Wall behind exhaust hood must be non-combustible, reference mechanical comments. L. Detail 1/PH1: Door 300D needs 18" clearance on strike jamb side, Section 404.2.3.1. END OF REVIEW |
| 05/13/2009 | RONALD BROWN | ZONING HC SITE | REVIEW | Denied | REFER TO BUILDING COMMENTS |
| 05/20/2009 | GERRY KOZIOL | WWM | REVIEW | Approved | |
| 05/20/2009 | STEVE SHIELDS | ZONING | REVIEW | Denied | DSD TRANSMITTAL FROM: Steve Shields Lead Planner PROJECT: SAM's Club Remodel T09CM01041 Building Plan (1st Review) TRANSMITTAL DATE: May 20, 2009 1. The building plan has been reviewed by Zoning Review Section but cannot approve the plan until all zoning comments or concerns have been addressed. 2. Zoning could not verify that the building plan was in compliance with the approved site plan.. Please submit two copies of the approved and stamped site plan with the next building plan submittal. 3. Zoning will re-review the building plan on the next submittal to insure compliance with the approved and stamped site plan. Additional comments may be forthcoming. If you have any questions about this transmittal, please contact me at Steve.Shields@tucsonaz.gov or (520) 837-4956 C:\planning\grading\t09cm01041.doc RESUBMITTAL OF THE FOLLOWING IS REQUIRED: |
| 05/27/2009 | BIANCA RAMIREZ | ENGINEERING | REVIEW | Denied | DSD TRANSMITTAL FROM: Bianca Ramirez, CFM Engineering Associate PROJECT: SAM's Club Remodel T09CM01041 Building Plan (1st Review) TRANSMITTAL DATE: May 27, 2009 1. The building plan has been reviewed by Engineering Review Section but cannot approve the plan until all comments and/or concerns have been addressed. 2. Zoning could not verify that the building plan was in compliance with the approved site plan.. Please submit two copies of the approved and stamped site plan with the next building plan submittal. One zoning has approved, the engineering department will sign off. 3. Engineering will re-review the building plan on the next submittal to insure compliance with the approved and stamped site plan. 4. Unable to approve building plans until site plan has been approved. 5. Additional comments may be forthcoming. If you have any questions about this transmittal, please contact me at bianca.ramirez@tucsonaz.gov or (520) 837-4928. |
| 05/29/2009 | RICK MYERS | PLUMBING-COMMERCIAL | REVIEW | Denied | 1. Waste and vent isometric on sheet P-2.2 detail 2 snack bar, does not match the isometric for the grocery waste and vent on sheet P-2.5 detail two. Which fixtures discharge into existing G.I. and which discharge into new G.I? 2. Note 15.403 on sheet P-2.5 shows point of connection to existing sanitary sewer, which is noted on the plan as grease waste. 3. Three compartment sinks are to be directly connected to the sanitary sewer. One compartment may be indirectly wasted if it is a sanitizing bowl or a vegetable prep sink. 4. Reference 608.7 Vacuum Relief Valves. Where a hot water storage tank or an indirect water heater is located at an elevation above the fixture outlets in the hot water system , a vacuum relief valve shall be installed on the storage tank or water heater. 5. Excepting fixtures installed in a combination waste and vent system, all fixture traps to have a connecting vent installed per chapter nine 2006 UPC. 6. Reference appendix B. 2006 UPC Restaurant kitchen equipment should not be connected to the CWV system. 7. Reference 910.3 2006 UPC CWV systems shall have a vent located down stream of the uppermost fixture. 8. Reference 411.4 2006 UPC Floors shall be sloped to the floor drains. Show how the floor is to be sloped to the drain. |
| 05/29/2009 | ROBERT SHERRY | MECHANICAL-COMMERCIAL | REVIEW | Approved | |
| 05/29/2009 | ROBERT SHERRY | WATER | REVIEW | Approved | |
| 06/01/2009 | RAY MAJUTA | ELECTRICAL-COMMERCIAL | REVIEW | Denied | PROJECT:4701 N STONE, T09CM01041 SAM'S TI POWER,LIGHTING AND EQUIPMENT The electrical plan have been denied for the following; 1. The City of Tucson Development Service Department through their Commercial Submittal Requirements,provides the information necessary in order to review Tenant Improvements. Attched is a copy of these requirements. Under the Electrical requirements, panel schedules are required, these are to include circuit discriptions, assigned numbers, individual phase loads, and total loads. The following Sheets, E1,E1.1,E1.2,E1.4,E2,E2.1,E2.2,E2.3,E2.4,E2.5, all contain in the electrical notes the following, "Furnish and install new 20 amp circuits.Feed from Panelboard as indicated.E C shall verify prior to rough in that existing panelboard has spare capacity to accommodate load ". In order to complete plan review these notes will not be accepted, provide circuit numbers and discriptive names to circuits,individual loads and so forth as required per submittal requirements.Provide all panel schedules to be added to or re-fed. 2. Provide the size of Transformer TR4 which is to be replaced,also the primary and secondary feeders as provided for TCC. 3. Provide a panel schedule for PanelLPF which now feeds new Panel LPF2. This new panel shows a feeder which only has 3 #1's and a #6 grd, this feeder should have 4#1's and a #6 grd. 4.Provide size of conductors and conduit feeding PanelH1BC, as was provided for Panels LFS1 and LFS2. 5. The primary and secondary feeders for Disconnects LFS1 and LFS2 have been switched. The isolated ground is in question. 6. Some circuits indicate to be re-fed from existing , provide circuit numbers and panels they will be assigned to. Ray T Majuta Elect Plan Check DSD City of Tucson 5/30/09 520-837-4988 |
Final Status
| Task End Date | Reviewer's Name | Type of Review | Description |
|---|---|---|---|
| 07/09/2009 | DELMA ROBEY | OUT TO CUSTOMER | Completed |
| 07/09/2009 | SUE REEVES | REJECT SHELF | Completed |