Microfiche records prior to 2006 have not been completely digitized and may not be available yet on PRO. If you can not find what you are looking for please submit a records request.
Permit Review Detail
Review Status: Completed
Review Details: COMMERCIAL NEW
Permit Number - T09CM00963
Review Name: COMMERCIAL NEW
Review Status: Completed
| Review Date | Reviewer's Name | Type of Review | Description | Status | Comments |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 04/24/2009 | DAVE MANN | FIRE | REVIEW | Approved | |
| 04/24/2009 | JOHN WILLIAMS | COMMERCIAL IMPACT FEE | COMMERCIAL IMPACT FEE PROCESSING | Completed | |
| 04/28/2009 | ERIC NEWCOMB | BUILDING-COMMERCIAL | REVIEW | Denied | 1. GENERAL: ENGINEER OF RECORD STAMPING SHEETS C1.0 THROUGH C5.0 HAS A LICENSE THAT EXPIRED ON 9-30-08. VERIFY. 2. SHEET C8.1; WATER HARVESTING TANKS: IF TANKS EXCEED THE CRITERIA LISTED IN THE 2006 IBC, SECTION 105.2(5), STAMPED AND SIGNED DESIGN CALCULATIONS AND DRAWINGS ARE REQUIRED. 3. CALCULATIONS SHEET 5; CALCULATIONS SHEET 15: DID NOT LOCATE BEAM B4 ON KEY PLAN OR ON DRAWING. CLARIFY. 4. SHEET S1.1; CALCULATIONS SHEET 3: THE CONCRETE BASIS FOR DESIGN IN THE CALCULATIONS IS 3000 PSI FOR SLABS AND FOUNDATIONS, WHILE THE GENERAL NOTES IN THE DRAWINGS INDICATE THE CONCRETE COMPRESSIVE STRENGTH OF 4000 PSI. CLARIFY. 5. SHEET S1.1; CALCULATIONS SHEET 3: THE BOLTS BASIS FOR DESIGN IN THE CALCULATIONS IS A307. ADD A HIGH STRENGTH BOLT SPECIFICATION TO THE CALCULATIONS TO MATCH THE GENERAL NOTE FOR BEAM AND COLUMN CONNECTIONS. 6. SHEET S1.1; CALCULATIONS SHEET 3: THE REINFORCEMENT BASIS FOR DESIGN IN THE CALCULATIONS IS 60 KSI FOR #6 AND LARGER, AND 40 KSI FOR #5 AND SMALLER, WHILE THE GENERAL NOTES IN THE DRAWINGS INDICATE GRADE 60 FOR ALL BARS. CLARIFY. 7. SHEET S3.1; ROOF FRAMING PLAN: LOCATE THE COLUMNS FOR THE MECHANICAL SCREEN IN THE EAST/WEST DIRECTION. 8. SHEET S5.1 (DETAIL LP1); SHEET E0.1 (DETAIL N12): THE ELECTRICAL SHEET SHOULD REFERENCE STRUCTURAL FOR THE LIGHT POLE FOOTING. 9. SHEET S4.1 (DETAIL K9); CALCULATIONS: DID NOT FIND A CALCULATION FOR THE TRASH ENCLOSURE WALL AND FOOTING. CLARIFY. |
| 04/30/2009 | ERIC NEWCOMB | ZONING HC SITE | REVIEW | Approved | |
| 05/01/2009 | GERRY KOZIOL | WWM | REVIEW | Approved | |
| 05/05/2009 | JASON GREEN | ENGINEERING | REVIEW | Denied | DATE: May 5, 2009 REVIEWERS: Jason Green, CFM ACTIVITY: T09CM00963 (Building Plan) SUMMARY: Engineering Division of Development Services Department has received the building plan (T09CM00963). Engineering Division does not recommend approval of the building plan application at this time. The following items need to be addressed: BUILDING PLAN COMMENTS: 1) Engineering could not verify that the building plan was in compliance with the stamped approved Development Plan (D09-0009). Please submit two copies of the stamped approved Development Plan, landscape, and NPPO plans with the next building plan submittal. 2) Engineering will re-review the building plan on the next submittal to insure compliance with the approved and stamped Development Plan. Additional comments may be forthcoming. GENERAL COMMENTS: Please provide the building plan with a copy of the last approved Development Plan (D09-0009). Further comments may be generated upon resubmittal of the building plan review. For questions or to schedule an appointment I can be reached at 837-4929. Jason Green, CFM Senior Engineer Associate Engineering Division COT Development Services |
| 05/05/2009 | RAY MAJUTA | ELECTRICAL-COMMERCIAL | REVIEW | Denied | Project: 1925 N Kolb, T09CM00963 Convenience Store Electrical plans denied for following: 1. Sheet E2.3 shows an 800 amp main whuile Sheet E1.1 shows a 1000 amp main, also clearify number of conduitd and conductors to service, each has different stated. 2.Sheet E1.1 panel E shows dispensers 11 and 12 with loads . Ray T Majuta DSD City of Tucson Electrical plan k 520-837-4988 5-08-09 |
| 05/13/2009 | STEVE SHIELDS | ZONING | REVIEW | Denied | DSD TRANSMITTAL FROM: Steve Shields Lead Planner PROJECT: Quick Trip #1493 T09CM00963, T09CM00965 & T09BU00600 Building Plan (1st Review) TRANSMITTAL DATE: May 13, 2009 1. The building plan has been reviewed by Zoning Review Section but cannot approve the plan until all zoning comments or concerns have been addressed. 2. Zoning could not verify that the building plan was in compliance with the approved development plan. Please submit two copies of the approved and stamped development plan with the next building plan submittal. 3. Zoning will re-review the building plan on the next submittal to insure compliance with the approved and stamped development plan. Additional comments may be forthcoming. If you have any questions about this transmittal, please contact me at Steve.Shields@tucsonaz.gov or (520) 837-4956 C:\planning\grading\t09cm00963.doc RESUBMITTAL OF THE FOLLOWING IS REQUIRED: |
| 05/19/2009 | ROBERT SHERRY | MECHANICAL-COMMERCIAL | REVIEW | Denied | Provide energy code compliance calculations for the building envelope. Provide sufficient detail on the drawings to evaluate the energy compliance of the building envelope. The information shall, as a minimum, include U-factors of the envelope systems and fenestration components, along with the R-values of the insulation. Reference: Sections 101.4 and 104.2, International Energy Conservation Code 2006 |
| 05/20/2009 | RICK MYERS | PLUMBING-COMMERCIAL | REVIEW | Denied | 1. Show that the floor of the restroom slopes toward the floor drain. Reference: Section 411.2 UPC 2006. 2.Coordinate the roof drainage design (sheet P2.3) and the building storm sewer design (civil sheet C5.0) Show storm drain piping, termination, and connection to building storm sewer. Reference: Sections 103.23 and 1101.12.2, UPC 2006. |
| 05/20/2009 | RMYERS1 | WATER | REVIEW | Approved |
Final Status
| Task End Date | Reviewer's Name | Type of Review | Description |
|---|---|---|---|
| 09/25/2009 | DELMA ROBEY | OUT TO CUSTOMER | Completed |
| 09/25/2009 | SUE REEVES | REJECT SHELF | Completed |