Microfiche records prior to 2006 have not been completely digitized and may not be available yet on PRO. If you can not find what you are looking for please submit a records request.
Permit Review Detail
Review Status: Completed
Review Details: SITE
Permit Number - T09CM00929
Review Name: SITE
Review Status: Completed
| Review Date | Reviewer's Name | Type of Review | Description | Status | Comments |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 04/24/2009 | DAVE MANN | FIRE | REVIEW | Approved | |
| 04/27/2009 | RBROWN1 | ADA | REVIEW | Denied | 1. The contemplation Pit is not accessible. Please provide an accessible ramp as per ADAAG, Section 4.1.2. 2. Please provide accessible seating at all seating areas as per Section 4.1.3. (18) and (19) as applicable. 3. At details 5 and 8 sheet 6: the 1" and 1/2" concrete reveal with the 1/2" and 1/4" radii does not comply with ADAAG, Section 4.5.2. 4. At detail 1/7: Please provide handrial extensions as per ADAAG, Section 4.9.4. 5. At detail 5/8, lower edge of plaque to 2'-10". END OF REVIEW |
| 04/27/2009 | RONALD BROWN | ZONING HC SITE | REVIEW | Passed | THIS IS A COT OWNED AND OPERATED PROJECT. REFERENCE ADA SITE REVIEW COMMENTS. |
| 05/01/2009 | TERRY STEVENS | ZONING | REVIEW | Denied | DSD TRANSMITTAL FROM: Terry Stevens Lead Planner PROJECT: T09CM00929 750 S. Convent Site Plan - Park TRANSMITTAL DATE: 5/04/09 COMMENTS: Please resubmit revised drawings along with redlines and a response letter, which states how all Zoning Review Section comments regarding the Land Use Code and Development Standards were addressed. 1. Completion of the HPZ review process is required prior to approval by zoning of the site plan. 2. Provide a dimension from the west property line to the proposed 7' patio wall. 3. Completion of the DDO process or a waiver from HPZ regarding the location of the seven (7) foot patio high wall is required prior to approval by zoning of the site plan. See previous DDO comments. 4. The historic plaque, indicated by keynote #20, and the bicycle parking spaces, indicated by keynote #25, will require a Temporary Revocable Easement (TRE) be obtained from the Real Estate Division of the City of Tucson. 5. Provide documentation indicating approval for the development of the park within the right of way from the transportation department of the City of Tucson. 6. In the development regulation portion on sheet 1 of 11, provide the required setback of structures per LUC 3.2.6.4. The seven (7) foot high wall is considered a structure. The required setback when adjacent to commercial or office zoned property is the height of the structure. Revise note. If you have any questions about this transmittal, please call Terry Stevens, (520) 837-4961 C:\planning\cdrc\DSD\T09CM00929.doc RESUBMITTAL OF THE FOLLOWING IS REQUIRED: Revised site plan and additional requested documents |
| 05/05/2009 | JASON GREEN | ENGINEERING | REVIEW | Denied | DATE: May 6, 2009 SUBJECT: 750 S Convent Ave Site Plan- Engineering Review TO: Walter Rogers LOCATION: T14S R13E Sec13 Ward 6 REVIEWERS: Jason Green, CFM ACTIVITY: T09CM00929 (Site Plan) SUMMARY: Engineering Division of Development Services Department has received and reviewed the site plan (T09CM00929) and Building Plan (T09CM00929) for the above referenced property. Engineering Division does not recommend approval of the plan sets at this time. The following items need to be addressed: SITE PLAN COMMENTS: 1) Revise the site plan to remove the wording "Book and Page" from both top and bottom right hand corners. This review is a site plan review not a Tentative Plat or Final Plat review. 2) Revise the site plan to provide the Site Address for the proposed parcel as identified in the Assessors Records. 3) Remove the additional Sheet 3 of 11 within the plan set. The plan set reviewed has 2 copies of Sheet 3; one can be removed for clarity. 4) DS Sec.2-02.2.1.A.10: Revise the site plan to label and dimension the proposed sight visibility triangles for the intersection of Convent Avenue and 18th Street. Provide the dimension for both the near and far side of the triangles per DS Sec.3-01.5.3. 5) DS Sec.2-02.2.1.A.10: Revise the site plan to relocate the proposed bicycle rack (Keynote #25) so that it is not in conflict with the existing SVT area. No structure between 30-inches and 72-inches is allowed within the SVT area. 6) DS Sec.2-02.2.1.A.12: Revise the site plan to provide the required 5-foot sidewalk within the public right-of-way of 18th Street. The proposed 4-foot sidewalk width is not acceptable per DS Sec.3-01.3.3.A. 7) DS Sec.2-02.2.1.A.12: Refer to comments from Ron Brown, RA Structural Plans Examiner for all onsite handicap and ADA requirements that apply to this project. 8) DS Sec2-02.2.1.A.15: Revise Sheet 3 of the plan set to remove the word "detention" from Cross Section 1, since detention/retention requirements are not applicable this areas must be labeled as "Water Harvesting," revise. 9) DS Sec2-02.2.1.A.16: Provide flow arrows on the site plan to verify flow patterns across the site. 10) DS Sec2-02.2.1.A.16: Provide a note on the site plan that states "Water Harvesting Areas to be depressed a minimum of 6-inches." Refer to the "City of Tucson Water Harvesting Guidance Manual, Ordinance # 10210" for recommendation on how to construct and maintain the required water harvesting areas for onsite flow containment. 11) DS Sec.2-02.2.1.A.17: Provide the cut and fill quantities on the site plan. 12) DS Sec.2-02.2.1.A.19: Revise the site plan to label both Convent Ave and 18th Street as public routes. 13) DS Sec2-02.2.1.A.19: Revise the site plan to clearly label the center lines of all streets that are shown. 14) DS Sec.2-02.2.1.A.19: Revise the site plan to label and dimension the existing right-of-ways for all streets. 15) DS Sec.2-02.2.1.A.21: Provide dimensions from all existing street monument lines to the existing and/or proposed curb, sidewalks, etc. Label the curbing along 18th Street as either existing or new, provide a keynote to reference the Standard Detail for Public Improvement for construction of the curb if proposed. 16) DS Sec.2-02.2.1.A.27: Provide a General Note stating that all fences or walls will require a separate permit for review and approval by all necessary Development Services Departments, specifically Keynote # 13. 17) Review and approval from TDOT Permits and Codes for all improvements within the public right-of-way will be required. A right-of-way use permit application will be required prior to construction. Refer to the following links for TDOT Forms and applications: a) http://www.tucsonaz.gov/dsd/Forms_Fees___Maps/Applications/applications.html / b) http://www.dot.ci.tucson.az.us/engineering/pia.php c) Or contact Thad Harvison at 837-6592 for all additional questions regarding r-o-w. 18) Be advised that further comments may be forth coming on resubmittal of the site plan. BUILDING PLAN COMMENTS: 19) Engineering could not verify that the building plan was in compliance with a stamped approved site plan (T09CM00929). Please submit two copies of the stamped approved site plan, landscape, and NPPO plans with the next building plan submittal. 20) Engineering will re-review the building plan on the next submittal to insure compliance with the approved and stamped site plan. Additional comments may be forthcoming. GRADING PLAN COMMENTS: 21) DS Sec.11-01.2.1: A grading permit may be required for this project depending on the proposed cut and fill quantities. A grading plan and a grading permit application will be required after site plan approval and prior to any construction activity. A grading permit may not be issued prior to site plan approval. 22) Please ensure that the grading plan is consistent with the site plan and Drainage Statement. Grading standards may be accessed at: http://www.ci.tucson.az.us/dsd/DevStandsTOC.pdf. GENERAL COMMENTS: Please provide a revised site plan that addresses the comments provided above. Include a comprehensive response letter addressing in detail responses to all of the above comments. Enclose "redlines" with the resubmittal package. Further comments may be generated upon resubmittal of the site plan review. For questions, or to schedule an appointment, I can be reached at 837-4929. Jason Green, CFM Senior Engineer Associate Engineering Division COT Development Services |
| 05/18/2009 | ANDREW CONNOR | NPPO | REVIEW | Approved | Exception |
| 05/18/2009 | ANDREW CONNOR | LANDSCAPE | REVIEW | Denied | 1. HPZ review process must be complete to continue review. 2. Plantings and other ornamental features shall reflect the historic period of the subject structure. Landscaping may be reviewed in the context of a required HPZ review; landscaping alone shall not be considered through an HPZ review LUC 2.8.8.6.L.2. 3. If necessary include with re-submittal DDO approval documentation. Indicate on the lower right hand corner of the site plan, the case number, date of approval, and any conditions imposed. 4. The site plan and landscape plan must show identical site layout to avoid conflict between the two plans. Ensure that all changes to the site plan are reflected on the landscape plan. |
| 05/18/2009 | RICK MYERS | PLUMBING-COMMERCIAL | REVIEW | Approved |
Final Status
| Task End Date | Reviewer's Name | Type of Review | Description |
|---|---|---|---|
| 05/21/2009 | CINDY AGUILAR | OUT TO CUSTOMER | Completed |