Microfiche records prior to 2006 have not been completely digitized and may not be available yet on PRO. If you can not find what you are looking for please submit a records request.
Permit Review Detail
Review Status: Completed
Review Details: RESUBMITTAL
Permit Number - T09CM00922
Review Name: RESUBMITTAL
Review Status: Completed
| Review Date | Reviewer's Name | Type of Review | Description | Status | Comments |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 08/18/2010 | ERIC NEWCOMB | BUILDING-COMMERCIAL | REVIEW | Passed | PREVIOUS COMMENTS FROM MAY 11, 2009 REVIEW: 1. NO STRUCTURAL CALCULATIONS WERE PROVIDED. 2. A COMPLETE REVIEW WILL BE DONE WHEN THE STRUCTURAL CALCULATIONS ARE PROVIDED. 3. MAKE SURE ALL LETTERING IS MINIMUM 3/32", ALL CAPITALS. |
| 08/23/2010 | KEN VAN KARSEN | BUILDING-RESIDENTIAL | REVIEW | Approved | |
| 09/02/2010 | MICHAEL ST. PAUL | ZONING | REVIEW | Denied | CDRC TRANSMITTAL FROM: Michael St.Paul, Planning Technician PROJECT: T09CM00922 977 South Bill Martin Drive New SFR TRANSMITTAL: September 7, 2010 COMMENTS: Please attach a response letter with the next submittal, which states how all Zoning Review Section comments regarding the Land Use Code and Development Standards were addressed. 1) This review is for a new single-family residence (SFR) in the Canyon View Subdivision of Starr Pass. The zoning is R-1 RCP-4 (LUC Section 2.3.4.2.A.3). This lot is also identified as HDZ on the plat (LUC Section 2.8.1). 2) Refer to the plot plan instruction and model we hand out at the counter or Development Standards 2-02 for site plan requirements. (Note the margin requirements as well.) 3) All text and dimensions must be a minimum of twelve point (12pt) type or on-eight inch (1/8) lettering. 4) Dimension all lot lines per Final Plat (Sheet 2 of FP). Also clearly delineate and dimension the protected peak boundary (Sheet 2 of FP). Clearly depict and dimension sidewalk and curb locations. (Sheet 2 of the FP in included with the return set of drawings.) 5) Dimension the location of the structure from the nearest point of the structure to each lot line. 6) It appears that an HDZ CCRC Overlay review may be necessary. (See General Notes F.4. Sheet 1 of Tentative Plat.) This requirement shall be determined by the engineering reviewer with the plot plan and grading plan reviews (LUC Section 2.8.8.3.B). A slope calculation may be all that is required. 7) Provide the following notes on the plot plan: A) "This development will be constructed of material or painted a color that blends with the natural environment." B) "All outdoor lighting will be directed downward and away from surrounding property owners and neighborhoods." C) "All mechanical equipment, storage and parking areas to be screened with material compatible with the natural environment." 8) Please be aware that additional comments may be forthcoming relative to additional information and further submittals. Please refer to the plot plan instructions or DS 2-02 for all that is required on a site plan or plot plan. |
| 09/07/2010 | ELIZABETH LEIBOLD | ENGINEERING | REVIEW | Denied | TO: Timothy Robertson, RA SUBJECT: 977 S Bill Martin Dr Site/Grading Plan Review 2ND Resubmittal LOCATION: Canyon View at Starr Pass lot 28 REVIEWER: Elizabeth Leibold PE ACTIVITY NUMBERS: T09CM00922 / T09BU00580 Summary: Engineering Division has reviewed the submitted plan review package including a copy of the grading plan. Not all comments were addressed. Engineering does not recommend approval until the remaining comments are addressed. SITE / GRADING PLAN COMMENTS: 1) DS Sec.11-01.4.C: Address remaining clarification/notations that will be required for grading plan: a) For temporary erosion/sediment control, locate all silt fence within grading limits. b) DS Sec.2-02.2.1.A.19: Label the edge of existing sidewalk for Bill Martin Drive along lot property boundary area. c) DS Sec.2-02.2.11: Address the remaining driveway comments: i) Provide cross section from driveway to street across side slope with proposed slope grades. Clarify cut/fill condition and provide spot elevations at west edge of driveway. ii) Label type and show erosion protection along edge of driveway. d) DS Sec.11-01.10.5: South yard at base and top of cut slope still needs clarification. Address the remaining comments: i) Clarify spot elevations in rear yard and within top and bottom interceptor swales directing runoff away from proposed house and around the yard. Provide spot elevations in rear yard indicating/clarifying positive flow out of the rear yard. Show how design will prevent stormwater runoff into or ponding in the west, south and east yard areas. Minimum 10-ft at 5% from structure is required per IBC. ii) A note is shown on plans stating that an interceptor swale is to be located at the top of rear slope however insufficient area is shown at top of slope. Clarify with dimensions and spot elevations and provide sufficient width on plans for the area needed for the interceptor swales that are required at top of cut slopes. Capacity for interceptors shall have a minimum of 30-in wide and 12-in deep. Show how stormwater runoff flow is intercepted and label erosion protection on a detail for rear yard interceptor swale and depict the area with dimensions on planview. e) DS Sec.9-04.3.1.A.2, Land Use Code (LUC) Sec. 2.8.1-I: Assure sufficient grading area is provided for grading construction of lot 28. Label locations within the driveway or yard areas for construction staging areas, construction materials, and vehicle parking. 2) A geotechnical report is referenced on the plans. If there are any proposed slopes that exceed 3:1(H:V) geotechnical report is required. Submit geotechnical report for the project or subdivision. 3) DS Sec.9-04.3.3.A: Add note to details that all rip rapped slopes shall have handplaced stone with filter fabric. 4) Clarify and label bearings, distance, and curve data for the lot lines, as well as labeling protected peak delineation within lot boundary, to match Final Plat. 5) Call to discuss inclusive home design requirements/process. 6) Add distance tie from building corner to property corner. It will be necessary to have a phone conversation or set up a meeting to go over comments before resubmittal. For resubmittal, please provide 2 copies of the site/grading plans with supporting documents including a copy of the geotechnical report, redlines, and response letter. I can be reached at 837-4934 if you have questions. Elizabeth Leibold, PE Civil Engineer Engineering Division Planning & Development Services Department |