Microfiche records prior to 2006 have not been completely digitized and may not be available yet on PRO. If you can not find what you are looking for please submit a records request.
Permit Review Detail
Review Status: Completed
Review Details: RESUBMITTAL
Permit Number - T09CM00841
Review Name: RESUBMITTAL
Review Status: Completed
| Review Date | Reviewer's Name | Type of Review | Description | Status | Comments |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 05/20/2009 | RONALD BROWN | BUILDING-COMMERCIAL | REVIEW | Approved | |
| 05/20/2009 | MARTIN BROWN | FIRE | REVIEW | Approved | |
| 05/20/2009 | RONALD BROWN | ZONING HC SITE | REVIEW | Approved | |
| 05/21/2009 | GERRY KOZIOL | WWM | REVIEW | Approved | |
| 05/26/2009 | ROBERT SHERRY | PLUMBING-COMMERCIAL | REVIEW | Denied | 1. Comment not resolved. Fixture units are arbitrary values used to determine the instantaneous demand of a plumbing system consisting of multiple fixture types operating with differing flow rates and usage probabilities. The actual flow in a given terminal branch pipe is determined by the actual fixture. A flush valve for a siphonic water closet, for example, typically delivers 1.6 gallons of water in approximately four seconds (24 GPM). The branch piping sizes called out for the flush valves will result in water velocities greater than 8 FPS. Limit the water velocity to less than 8 FPS for the copper piping. Reference: Section A-6.1, UPC 2006 and IS 3-2003, Section 2.6; see also Table 604.3, IPC 2006. 2. Comment not resolved. The contributory area of the gymnasium roof has not been included; see detail 2/A6.1 and the slope arrows shown on drawing P1.1. (You also might want to ask the architect if the roofing has been listed as a waterfall receptor.) Revise the calculations for the size of the roof drains to include the effect of side walls draining onto the roof. Reference: Section 1106.4, UPC 2006. 3. Correct the size of the main gas pipe located between AC-6 and AC-7. Reference: Section 1217.0, UPC 2006. |
| 05/26/2009 | ROBERT SHERRY | WATER | REVIEW | Passed | Private water supply |
| 05/27/2009 | ROBERT SHERRY | MECHANICAL-COMMERCIAL | REVIEW | Denied | Comment not resolved. The component descriptions used in the energy calculations do not agree with the drawings. Roof 2 can not be described as having its "insulation entirely above the deck" and both roof 1 and roof 2 have cavity insulation, not continuous insulation. None of the doors appear to be included in the analysis and the windows do not appear to be specified as having a thermal break. The masonry walls do not appear to be specified as having insulating cells even though vermiculite is included in the material specifications. Provide sufficient detail on the drawings to evaluate the energy compliance of the building envelope. The building appears to have multiple wall and roof types that are not reflected on the energy calculations. Reference: Section 104.2, IECC 2006. |
| 05/28/2009 | TERRY STEVENS | ZONING | REVIEW | Approved |
Final Status
| Task End Date | Reviewer's Name | Type of Review | Description |
|---|---|---|---|
| 05/29/2009 | CPIERCE1 | OUT TO CUSTOMER | Completed |
| 05/29/2009 | SUE REEVES | REJECT SHELF | Completed |