Microfiche records prior to 2006 have not been completely digitized and may not be available yet on PRO. If you can not find what you are looking for please submit a records request.
Permit Review Detail
Review Status: Completed
Review Details: COMMERCIAL NEW
Permit Number - T09CM00798
Review Name: COMMERCIAL NEW
Review Status: Completed
Review Date | Reviewer's Name | Type of Review | Description | Status | Comments |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
04/08/2009 | MARTIN BROWN | FIRE | REVIEW | Approved | |
04/09/2009 | GERRY KOZIOL | WWM | REVIEW | Passed | |
04/10/2009 | JASON GREEN | ENGINEERING | REVIEW | Denied | DATE: April 10, 2009 REVIEWERS: Jason Green, CFM ACTIVITY: T09CM00798 (Building Plan) SUMMARY: Engineering Division of Development Services Department has received the building plan (T09CM00798) for the above referenced property. Engineering Division does not recommend approval of the building plan application at this time. The following items need to be addressed: BUILDING PLAN COMMENTS: 1) Engineering could not verify that the building plan was in compliance with the stamped approved Development Plan (D08-0051). Please submit two copies of the stamped approved Development Plan, landscape, and NPPO plans with the next building plan submittal. 2) Engineering will re-review the building plan on the next submittal to insure compliance with the approved and stamped Development Plan. Additional comments may be forthcoming. GENERAL COMMENTS: Please provide the building plan with a copy of the last approved Development Plan. Further comments may be generated upon resubmittal of the building plan review. For questions or to schedule an appointment I can be reached at 837-4929. Jason Green, CFM Senior Engineer Associate Engineering Division COT Development Services |
04/13/2009 | ERIC NEWCOMB | BUILDING-COMMERCIAL | REVIEW | Denied | 1. SHEET AB1 OF 3 (FOOTING NOTES); GEOTECHNICAL REPORT 08-0832: FOOTING NOTE 2 DOES NOT COMPLY WITH THE RECOMMENDATIONS OF THE GEOTECHNICAL REPORT. REVISE NOTES AND CALCULATIONS AS REQUIRED. 2. SHEETS AB2/AB3 OF 3; FOOTING DETAILS: REVISE DETAILS AS REQUIRED TO COMPLY WITH THE RECOMMENDATIONS OF THE GEOTECHNICAL REPORT (PER PLAN NOTE ON SHEETS AB2/AB3). |
04/14/2009 | RONALD BROWN | ZONING HC SITE | REVIEW | Passed | no accessibility required |
04/15/2009 | TERRY STEVENS | ZONING | REVIEW | Denied | 04/15/2009 Development Services Department Zoning Review Section Terry Stevens Lead Planner Comments: 1. The building plan has been reviewed by Zoning Review Section but cannot approve the plan until it has been approved by the Engineering, and Landscape Review Sections and until all zoning comments or concerns have been addressed. 2. Zoning could not verify that the building plan was in compliance with the approved development plan. Please submit two copies of the approved and stamped development, landscape, and NPPO plans with the next building plan submittal. 3. Zoning will re-review the building plan on the next submittal to insure compliance with the approved site/development plan. Additional comments may be forthcoming. |
04/16/2009 | RAY MAJUTA | ELECTRICAL-COMMERCIAL | REVIEW | Approved | |
04/20/2009 | ROBERT SHERRY | PLUMBING-COMMERCIAL | REVIEW | Denied | The minimum opening height for a scupper is 4". Reference: Section 1101.11.2.1, UPC 2006. |
04/20/2009 | ROBERT SHERRY | MECHANICAL-COMMERCIAL | REVIEW | Passed | |
04/20/2009 | ROBERT SHERRY | WATER | REVIEW | Passed |
Final Status
Task End Date | Reviewer's Name | Type of Review | Description |
---|---|---|---|
04/21/2009 | CPIERCE1 | OUT TO CUSTOMER | Completed |
04/21/2009 | SUE REEVES | REJECT SHELF | Completed |