Permit Review Detail
Review Status: Completed
Review Details: RESUBMITTAL
Permit Number - T09CM00757
Review Name: RESUBMITTAL
Review Status: Completed
| Review Date | Reviewer's Name | Type of Review | Description | Status | Comments |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 11/04/2010 | MICHAEL ST. PAUL | ZONING | REVIEW | Denied | CDRC TRANSMITTAL FROM: Michael St.Paul, Planning Technician PROJECT: T09CM00757 644 North Van Alstine Street #01 Roofing with increase in wall height Second review TRANSMITTAL: November 4, 2010 COMMENTS: Please attach a response letter with the next submittal, which states how all Zoning Review Section comments regarding the Land Use Code and Development Standards were addressed. A DDO SHALL BE REQUIRED FOR THE INCREASE IN WALL HEIGHT. NEW COMMENTS SHALL BE NECESSARY PRIOR TO SUBMITTAL FOR THE DDO. 1) There has been an increase in the wall height as noted on your plans. See keynote #7 on sheet A2. Also look at the letter from Mr. Luis Gustavo Mena to the Zoning Administrator dated November 11, 2009, paragraph two. In addition, see the letter from Mr. Balak to Mr. Mena, dated December 7, 2009. The facts are contrary to comment #2 in your response letter. Revise you plans and comments to be consistent with the reality on the site. 2) A lot combination is required. This must be recorded with the Pima County Assessor. Depict the subdivision lot lines on your along with the current parcel lines. The front property lines of the adjacent parcels do not match the new front property line of this parcel. Revise the plot plan. A copy of the Assessor's lot combination from has been included with your return set. 3) Revise the legal description to match the current configuration of the parcel and provide the new parcel number after the lot combination is complete (DS2-02.2.1.A.2). 4) Identify the uses and dimension each structure. Provide floor plans fro each structure. Are there two (2) units on this site, or is there one unit with a storage room or detached sleeping quarters? Neither structure, as presented, meets the minimum requirements for a single family residence (SFR). 5) Do not use dimensions with plus or minus symbols. Use precise dimensions, within a tenth of a foot or within inches. Anything smaller than that is unnecessary and usually inaccurate. 6) Revise the lot coverage calculation to include the vehicle use areas (carports and driveways) along with the enclosed structures already listed. 7) Identify the zoning of the adjacent parcels on the plan. 8) A copy of the plot plan instruction is included in with the return set. Additional comments may be necessary relative to information provided with the next submittal. |
| 11/16/2010 | RONALD BROWN | BUILDING-RESIDENTIAL | REVIEW | Approved |
Final Status
| Task End Date | Reviewer's Name | Type of Review | Description |
|---|---|---|---|
| 11/24/2010 | GERARDO BONILLA | OUT TO CUSTOMER | Completed |
| 11/24/2010 | SUE REEVES | REJECT SHELF | Completed |