Microfiche records prior to 2006 have not been completely digitized and may not be available yet on PRO. If you cannot find what you are looking for please submit a records request.

Permit Number: T09CM00757
Parcel: 116160690

Review Status: Completed

Review Details: RESIDENTIAL BLDG/ZONING/ENGINE/NPPO

Permit Number - T09CM00757
Review Name: RESIDENTIAL BLDG/ZONING/ENGINE/NPPO
Review Status: Completed
Review Date Reviewer's Name Type of Review Description Status Comments
04/21/2009 MICHAEL ST. PAUL ZONING REVIEW Denied CDRC TRANSMITTAL


FROM: Michael St.Paul, Planning Technician

PROJECT:
T09CM00757
644 North Van Alstine Street #01
Roof on existing unit


TRANSMITTAL: April 27, 2009


COMMENTS: Please attach a response letter with the next submittal, which states how all Zoning Review Section comments regarding the Land Use Code and Development Standards were addressed.


1) This review is for a multi-family site in the R-3 Zone (LUC Section 2.3.6.2.A.2). The Development Designator is "P" (LUC Section 3.2.3.1.D) and the Perimeter Yard Indicator is CC (LUC Section 3.2.6.4).

2) The plans depict a new roof being placed upon an existing building (Unit #01) with an increase in the height of the walls of the structure. A DDO shall be required for the increased height for the structure's wall facing the north property line. The minimum setback is ten (10) to the north property line. The proposed setback is one (1) foot six (6) inches.

3) The front porch or covered patio is depicted in the public right-of-way (ROW). The covered patio lightly depicted on the plot plan and is not indicated anywhere else on the drawing. If the covered patio is to be removed this must be noted on the site plan.

4) No part of the structure can be placed in the public ROW. If the plan is to keep the covered patio, clearly depict the patio on all the appropriate plans. It shall be necessary to purchase the property where the patio extends into the ROW. Please contact Jim Rossi (837-6718) or Jim Storanoff (837-6719) in the Real-estate Division of the City of Tucson to see if such a purchase is possible.

5) Please be aware that additional comments shall be necessary relative to additional information provided with the next submittal.
04/28/2009 ANDREW CONNOR NPPO REVIEW Passed See zoning review comments.
05/05/2009 RBROWN1 BUILDING-RESIDENTIAL REVIEW Denied 1. Provide 1 hour rated wall clarification to the North elevation walls which falls within 3' of the property line
2. Floor Plan Note Number 7: Claify and locate on plan all bedrooms and identify escape openings provided.
3. If Utility Area is to receive a new 4" slab as indicated by note 5 on section "A-A" then:
a. Clarify separation of existing foundation to remaion to new slab.
b. Provide note 5 on Utility Floor Plan.
4. Clarify electrical lighting effects of raising the roof and ceiling structure.
5. Please not if these building are on the Historical Regester.

Final Status

Task End Date Reviewer's Name Type of Review Description
05/15/2009 GERARDO BONILLA OUT TO CUSTOMER Completed
05/15/2009 SUE REEVES REJECT SHELF Completed