Permit Review Detail
Review Status: Completed
Review Details: COMMERCIAL NEW
Permit Number - T09CM00747
Review Name: COMMERCIAL NEW
Review Status: Completed
| Review Date | Reviewer's Name | Type of Review | Description | Status | Comments |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 04/03/2009 | DAVE MANN | FIRE | REVIEW | Approved | Separate, deferred submittal required for underground fuel tanks. |
| 04/03/2009 | GERRY KOZIOL | WWM | REVIEW | Approved | |
| 04/03/2009 | JOHN WILLIAMS | COMMERCIAL IMPACT FEE | COMMERCIAL IMPACT FEE PROCESSING | Completed | |
| 04/08/2009 | ERIC NEWCOMB | BUILDING-COMMERCIAL | REVIEW | Denied | 1. SHEET N1.1; SUMMARY OF PROJECT: COMPLETE THE LOCATION OF THE PROJECT. 2. SHEET S1.1; CALCULATIONS SHEET 3: THE CONCRETE BASIS FOR DESIGN IN THE CALCULATIONS IS 3000 PSI FOR SLABS AND FOUNDATIONS, WHILE THE GENERAL NOTES IN THE DRAWINGS INDICATE THE CONCRETE COMPRESSIVE STRENGTH OF 4000 PSI. CLARIFY. 3. SHEET S1.1; CALCULATIONS SHEET 3: THE BOLTS BASIS FOR DESIGN IN THE CALCULATIONS IS A307. ADD A HIGH STRENGTH BOLT SPECIFICATION TO THE CALCULATIONS TO MATCH THE GENERAL NOTE FOR BEAM AND COLUMN CONNECTIONS. 4. SHEET S1.1; CALCULATIONS SHEET 3: THE REINFORCEMENT BASIS FOR DESIGN IN THE CALCULATIONS IS 60 KSI FOR #6 AND LARGER, AND 40 KSI FOR #5 AND SMALLER, WHILE THE GENERAL NOTES IN THE DRAWINGS INDICATE GRADE 60 FOR ALL BARS. CLARIFY. 5. SHEET S3.1; ROOF FRAMING PLAN: LOCATE THE COLUMNS FOR THE MECHANICAL SCREEN IN THE EAST/WEST DIRECTION. 6. SHEET S5.1 (DETAIL LP1); SHEET E0.1 (DETAIL N12): THE ELECTRICAL SHEET SHOULD REFERENCE STRUCTURAL FOR THE LIGHT POLE FOOTING. 7. SHEET S4.1 (DETAIL K9); CALCULATIONS: DID NOT FIND A CALCULATION FOR THE TRASH ENCLOSURE WALL AND FOOTING. CLARIFY. |
| 04/09/2009 | ERIC NEWCOMB | ZONING HC SITE | REVIEW | Approved | |
| 04/13/2009 | ROBERT SHERRY | WATER | REVIEW | Approved | |
| 04/14/2009 | ROBERT SHERRY | MECHANICAL-COMMERCIAL | REVIEW | Approved | |
| 04/14/2009 | ROBERT SHERRY | PLUMBING-COMMERCIAL | REVIEW | Denied | 1. Show that the floor of the restroom slopes toward the floor drain. Reference: Section 411.2, UPC 2006. 2. Clarify how the CW shut off valve for the building is accessible at all times. Reference: Section 605.2, UPC 2006. 3. Clarify how the flow control device for the hydromechanical grease interceptor is readily accessible and complies with the installation requirements of the manufacturer. Reference: Sections 310.4 and 1014.2.1, UPC 2006. 4. Clarify how a direct connection of the creamer machine drains to the indirect waste manifold (Detail M12/P2.1) complies with the requirements of Section 801.2.3, UPC 2006. |
| 04/14/2009 | RAY MAJUTA | ELECTRICAL-COMMERCIAL | REVIEW | Denied | Project: 5151 E Speedway, T09CM00747, Store T09CM00748, Canopy Electrical plans denied for the following, 1.Sheet E1.1 shows a 1000 amp circuit breaker for main at DB-T, and no feeders called out. Sheet E2.3 on one line shows 2 4" conduits with 4 #500 kcmil conductors which equals 760 amps.The load shown is 770 Amps. 2. Sheet E2.3 also shows an 800 amp circuit breaker main. different from Sheet E1.1. 3.Size the ground for the main service on sheet E2.3. 4. Provide information sheet on Veeder Root System. 5. Cannot locate following circuits on Power Plan sheet however they are on the Panel Schedule, Panel E 16,18,22,24,28,30,34,36. Ray T Majuta DSD City of Tucson,Az Electrical Plan Ck 520-837-4988 4-13-09 |
| 04/21/2009 | SREEVES1 | ZONING | REVIEW | Needs Review | |
| 04/21/2009 | JASON GREEN | ENGINEERING | REVIEW | Denied | DATE: May 4, 2009 REVIEWERS: Jason Green, CFM ACTIVITY: T09CM00747 (Building Plan) SUMMARY: Engineering Division of Development Services Department has received the building plan (T09CM00747). Engineering Division does not recommend approval of the building plan application at this time. The following items need to be addressed: BUILDING PLAN COMMENTS: 1) Engineering could not verify that the building plan was in compliance with the stamped approved Development Plan (D09-0006). Please submit two copies of the stamped approved Development Plan, landscape, and NPPO plans with the next building plan submittal. 2) Engineering will re-review the building plan on the next submittal to insure compliance with the approved and stamped Development Plan. Additional comments may be forthcoming. GENERAL COMMENTS: Please provide the building plan with a copy of the last approved Development Plan (D09-0006). Further comments may be generated upon resubmittal of the building plan review. For questions or to schedule an appointment I can be reached at 837-4929. Jason Green, CFM Senior Engineer Associate Engineering Division COT Development Services |
Final Status
| Task End Date | Reviewer's Name | Type of Review | Description |
|---|---|---|---|
| 04/21/2009 | CPIERCE1 | OUT TO CUSTOMER | Completed |