Permit Review Detail
Review Status: Completed
Review Details: COMMERCIAL NEW
Permit Number - T09CM00695
Review Name: COMMERCIAL NEW
Review Status: Completed
| Review Date | Reviewer's Name | Type of Review | Description | Status | Comments |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 09/08/2009 | DAVE MANN | FIRE | REVIEW | Denied | Fire Comment: Provide the listing for the fire wall at west side of building per IBC Table 602. Show details to indicate oening protection per IBC Table 704.8 and parapets per IBC Section 704.11. |
| 09/08/2009 | STEVE SHIELDS | ZONING | REVIEW | Denied | DSD TRANSMITTAL FROM: Steve Shields Lead Planner PROJECT: Karama Offices T09CM00695 Building Plan (1st Review) TRANSMITTAL DATE: September 8, 2009 1. The building plans have been reviewed by Zoning Review Section but cannot approve the plan until all zoning comments or concerns have been addressed. 2. Zoning could not verify that the building plan was in compliance with the approved site plan. Please submit two copies of the approved and stamped site plan with the next building plan submittal. 3. Zoning will re-review the building plan on the next submittal to insure compliance with the approved and stamped site plan. Additional comments may be forthcoming. If you have any questions about this transmittal, please contact me at Steve.Shields@tucsonaz.gov or (520) 837-4956 C:\planning\grading\t09cm00695.doc RESUBMITTAL OF THE FOLLOWING IS REQUIRED: |
| 09/08/2009 | RONALD BROWN | ADA | REVIEW | Passed | NOT A COT OWNED/OPERATED PROPERTY |
| 09/08/2009 | BIANCA RAMIREZ | ENGINEERING | REVIEW | Denied | DATE: September 8, 2009 SUBJECT: Site TO: Jeffrey A Stanley LOCATION: 3038 E Ft. Lowell, T13S, R14E, Section 32, Ward 3 REVIEWERS: Bianca Ramirez, CFM ACTIVITY: T09BU00695 1st Review) RESUBMITTAL REQUIRED: Building Plan SUMMARY: Engineering Division of Development Services Department has received and reviewed the proposed building plan for the above referenced property. Engineering Division does not recommend approval of the building plan at this time. Please address the following review comments prior to the next submittal. Please include a response letter to the comments along with the corrected copies of the building and drainage report. Building Plan: 1. Unable to approve building plan at this time. Please resubmit once site plan and grading comments have been addressed. If you have any questions, I can be reached at 837-4928 or Bianca.Ramirez@tucsonaz.gov Bianca C. Ramirez Engineering Associate City of Tucson/Development Services Department 201 N. Stone Avenue P.O. Box 27210 Tucson, Arizona 85726-7210 (520) 837-4928 office (520) 879-8010 fax |
| 09/14/2009 | ERIC NEWCOMB | BUILDING-COMMERCIAL | REVIEW | Denied | 1. SHEET S1.1 (DETAIL 102); SHEET S1.2 (DETAIL 201): DETAIL 102 INDICATES THE WALL STUDS AT 16" OC, WHILE DETAIL 201 INDICATES WALL STUDS DIRECTLY BENEATH EACH PREFABRICATED WOOD TRUSS (SPACED AT 24" OC). CLARIFY. 2. SHEET S1.2 (ROOF FRAMING PLAN); SHEET M0.1 (HEAT PUMP SCHEDULE): THE WEIGHTS OF THE MECHANICAL UNITS INDICATED ON SHEET S1.2 DIFFER FROM THE WEIGHTS INDICATED IN THE HEAT PUMP SCHEDULE. CLARIFY. 3. SHEET A7: PROVIDE ACCESSIBLE COUNTERS, SINK, AND WORK SURFACES PER IBC CHAPTER 11 AND ANSI CHAPTER 9. 4. GENERAL: ALL LETTERING MUST BE A MINIMUM OF 3/32" IN HEIGHT (SHEETS C-1, S1.1, E0.2). 5. GENERAL: ALL DEFERRED SUBMITTALS MUST BE APPROVED BY LEERAY HANLY. 6. GENERAL: PROVIDE WRITTEN RESPONSES TO ALL REVIEW COMMENTS. |
| 09/15/2009 | ERIC NEWCOMB | ZONING HC | REVIEW | Denied | 1. SEE BUILDING COMMENTS. |
| 09/15/2009 | BETH GRANT | COMMERCIAL IMPACT FEE | COMMERCIAL IMPACT FEE PROCESSING | Approved | |
| 09/21/2009 | GERRY KOZIOL | WWM | REVIEW | Denied | NEED WASTEWATER 3RD FLOOR PCRWD/DON WILLHOLT REVIEW OF LOCATION & METHOD OF CONNECTION TO EXSISTING ON-SITE PRIVATE SEWER ON ADJACENT LOTS (EASEMENTS & JOINT SEWER MAINTENANCE AGREEMENTS) |
| 09/24/2009 | ROBERT SHERRY | MECHANICAL-COMMERCIAL | REVIEW | Denied | 1. Provide energy code compliance calculations using the correct climate zone; Pima County < 4,000 feet. Provide sufficient detail on the drawings to evaluate the energy compliance of the building envelope. The information shall, as a minimum, include U-factors of the envelope systems and fenestration components, along with the R-values of the insulation and the SHGC for the fenestration. Reference: Sections 101.4 and 104.2, International Energy Conservation Code 2006. 2. Insulation installed on a suspended ceiling with removable tiles cannot be counted as part of the roof insulation. Reference: Section 502.2.1, IECC 2006. 3. Provide calculations for HP-3 to show that the common ventilation system is sized in accordance with Section 403.3.2, IMC 2006. 4. Provide information on the sequence of operation for the restroom exhaust fans to show that recirculation of the air from the restrooms will not occur. Reference: Section 403.2.1, IMC 2006 |
| 09/24/2009 | RICK MYERS | PLUMBING-COMMERCIAL | REVIEW | Denied | 1. Provide the method of sterilization to be used on the domestic water system. Reference: 609.9 2006 UPC. 2. Where a water heater is located above the fixture outlets, a vacuum relief valve shall be installed. Reference: 608.7 2006 UPC. 3. See sheet P0.1 detail 3. Clarify location of expansion tank at water heater. Unless noted otherwise, hot water piping from a water heater shall correspond to the left side. Unless the expansion tank is rated for hot water, the expansion tank shall be installed at the cold inlet to the water heater. 4. See sheet P0.1 Fixture Unit Calculations. Use table 7-3 2006 UPC for DFUs. Flush tank water closets are rated at 4 DFUs. 5. Revise the size of the provided scuppers to comply with the requirements of Section 1101.11.2.1, UPC 2006. The minimum scupper width shall be equal to the circumference of the roof drain required by Table 11-1, UPC 2006. Refer also to Section 1106.4, UPC 2006. |
| 09/24/2009 | RMYERS1 | WATER | REVIEW | Approved | |
| 09/28/2009 | RAY MAJUTA | ELECTRICAL-COMMERCIAL | REVIEW | Denied | Project: 3038 E Ft Lowell, T09CM00695 New Office Bldg The Electrical Plans have been denied for the following: 1. Sheet E5.1 on the feeder schedule note 403U, only 3 conductors are shown, should be 4. 2.Call out the size for the grounding electrode conductor for the service.2005 NEC-250-66. 3. Indicate the circuit feeding the ex-fans. 4. Provide Outdoor Lighting Calculations as required per City Of Tucson, PSDS, according to the current City of Tucson/Pima County Outdoor Lighting Ord. 10135,2006. Ray T Majuta Elect Plan Ck PSDS City of Tucson 9/28/09 Ray.Majuta@tucsonaz.gov |
Final Status
| Task End Date | Reviewer's Name | Type of Review | Description |
|---|---|---|---|
| 10/13/2009 | DELMA ROBEY | OUT TO CUSTOMER | Completed |
| 10/13/2009 | SUE REEVES | REJECT SHELF | Completed |