Microfiche records prior to 2006 have not been completely digitized and may not be available yet on PRO. If you can not find what you are looking for please submit a records request.
Permit Review Detail
Review Status: Completed
Review Details: RESUBMITTAL - SITE ALL
Permit Number - T09CM00671
Review Name: RESUBMITTAL - SITE ALL
Review Status: Completed
| Review Date | Reviewer's Name | Type of Review | Description | Status | Comments |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 05/07/2009 | MARTIN BROWN | FIRE | REVIEW | Approved | |
| 05/07/2009 | JASON GREEN | ENGINEERING | REVIEW | Denied | DATE: May 8, 2009 SUBJECT: 3657 N 1st Avenue Site Plan- 2nd Engineering Review TO: Steve Koch LOCATION: T14S R14E Sec18 Ward 5 REVIEWERS: Jason Green, CFM ACTIVITY: T09CM00671 (Site Plan) SUMMARY: Engineering Division of Development Services Department has received and reviewed the site plan (T09CM00671) and Drainage Statement (JE Fuller/Hydrology and Geomorphology, Inc., 30MAR08) for the above referenced property. Engineering Division does not recommend approval of the site plan at this time. The following items need to be addressed: SITE PLAN COMMENTS: This project consists of a greater than 25% expansion per the Zoning Section review. The greater than 25% expansion requires that the entire site is reviewed and brought up to current full code requirements of the Development Standards and Land Use Code (this includes that all details and dimensions be shown on the proposed plan). 1) Make sure that all dimensions, details, sections, keynotes, proposed improvements and all other aspects of this project meet the minimum requirements within DS Sec.2-02, 3-01, 3-05 and 6-01 and are reflected on the site plan sheets. Restated. 2) Complied. 3) Complied. 4) Complied. 5) Complied. 6) Complied. 7) DS Sec.2-02.2.1.A.8: Revise the site plan to show a minimum unobstructed radius of 5 feet that is required at PAAL intersections, specifically at the PAAL access point and the start of the vehicular use area. This comment was not addressed. 8) Complied. 9) Complied. 10) Complied. 11) DS Sec.2-02.2.1.A.11: Revise the site plan to provide the required 25-foot radii at the PAAL entry point. Label the 25-feet radii and concrete curbs per City of Tucson Transportation Access Management Guidelines (TAMG), Section 5.5 at the driveway entrances located on 1st Avenue. Refer to DS Sec.3-01.3.2.C for street development standards. This requirement has been verified with TDOT Permits and Codes and is required. This comment was not addressed. 12) Complied. 13) Complied. 14) Complied. 15) DS Sec.2-02.2.1.A.12: Revise the site plan to show that all existing and proposed offsite handicap access ramps within the public right-of-way meet the design requirements per the public standard detail #207. Provide details and minimum slope requirements at all transitions from pedestrian circulation to vehicular circulation. Required 25-foot radii at entry point will require a redesign that may require the use of ramps for the public sidewalk, verify. This comment was not addressed. 16) DS Sec.2-02.2.1.A.12: Refer to comments from Ron Brown, RA Structural Plans Examiner for all onsite handicap and ANSI Standard requirements that apply to this project. Specifically the pedestrian access path that crosses in front of he 2nd loading zone inside the building. 17) Complied. 18) DS Sec.2-02.2.1.A.17: Provide the cut and fill quantities on the site plan. The comment "Not Applicable" does not satisfy this Development Standard. If cut and fill quantities are zero then provide a note on the site plan stating; "Cut- 0 Fill- 0." This comment was not addressed. 19) Complied. 20) Complied. 21) Complied. 22) Acknowledged. 23) Complied. 24) DS Sec.2-02.2.1.A.20: Verify that all existing and proposed easements are drawn with recordation information, location, width, and purpose of on the site plan. One example is the 1-foot no access easement adjacent to the front property line per the last approved Development Plan (Book 10, Page 003). The comment "Title Report Not Available" does not satisfy this comment. Since the easement is on the previously recorded Development Plan it must be shown on the new proposed site plan to be in conformance with the last approved plan, revise. This comment was not addressed. 25) Complied. 26) Complied. 27) DS Sec.2-02.2.1.A.32: Revise the site plan to provide a detail and dimensions for the proposed refuse containers. Refer to DS Sec.6-01 (Figure 3) for all required refuse enclosure dimensions and construction details. Per aerial view of the site the existing refuse containers are not located as shown on the proposed plan. It is acknowledged that the 2 containers can be located on one portion of the parcels; however a detail must be shown to verify that the refuse containers are constructed or will be constructed in conformance with DS Sec.6-01. Specifically, the 10'x10' clear inside dimension, bollards, CMU wall enclosure, approach apron and slope, gate, etc. This comment was not addressed. 28) DS Sec.2-02.2.1.A.32: Verify the maneuverability for the refuse containers. Provide approval from Andy Vera, Environmental Services, Andy.Vera@tucsonaz.gov to verify that refuse collection is acceptable to the Environmental Services Department. Refer to DS Sec.6-01 for all refuse requirements. This comment was not fully addressed. Due to the nature of the proposed vehicular use area and the tight corners, review and approval by Environmental Services is required prior to site plan approval. 29) Restated: Be advised that further comments may be forth coming on resubmittal of the site plan due to the full code requirement status. GRADING PLAN: 30) Restated: DS Sec.11-01.2.1: A grading permit may be required for this project depending on the proposed cut and fill quantities. A grading plan and a grading permit application will be required after site plan approval and prior to any construction activity. A grading permit may not be issued prior to site plan approval. 31) Restated: Please ensure that any future grading plan will be consistent with the Site Plan and Drainage Report Statement. Grading standards may be accessed at: http://www.ci.tucson.az.us/dsd/DevStandsTOC.pdf GENERAL COMMENTS: Please provide a revised site plan that addresses the comments provided above. Include a comprehensive response letter addressing in detail responses to all of the above comments. Enclose "redlines" with the resubmittal package. Further comments may be generated upon resubmittal of the site plan review. For questions, or to schedule an appointment, I can be reached at 837-4929. Jason Green, CFM Senior Engineer Associate Engineering Division COT Development Services |
| 05/08/2009 | TERRY STEVENS | ZONING | REVIEW | Denied | DSD TRANSMITTAL FROM: Terry Stevens Lead Planner PROJECT: T09CM00671 3657 N. 1st Ave. Site Plan TRANSMITTAL DATE: 5/08/09 COMMENTS: Please resubmit revised drawings along with redlines and a response letter, which states how all Zoning Review Section comments regarding the Land Use Code and Development Standards were addressed. 1. Per discussion with Phil Veneziano the review of this site plan will be done with the use of Automotive Service and Repair - Major for the entire site. 2. DS 2-02.2.1.2 The south property line of the east lot is indicated as 158.93 in length, the north property line is indicated as 143.93'. Clarify. 3. Revise the proposed use in the project data portion of sheet SP-1 as follows: Automotive - Service and Repair "30", subject to: Sec. 3.5.13.5 4. DS 2-02.2.1.12 Clearly indicate that the sidewalk indicated on the west lot is physically separated from the vehicular use area. The indicated curbing along the new building is not required but a striped pedestrian refuge area is required in this area. The sidewalk from where the handicap access aisle meets the concrete to the gate is required to be physically separated. 5. Revise note for sign on the gate (to remain open during business hours) to include the 24' rolling gate also. 6. The above comments are minor in nature and can be approved over the counter by setting an appointment with me. If you have any questions about this transmittal, please call Terry Stevens, (520) 837-4961 C:\planning\cdrc\DSD\T08CM00671-2.doc |
| 05/15/2009 | ANDREW CONNOR | LANDSCAPE | REVIEW | Denied | 1. Provide north arrow and scale on the landscape plan. 2. Provide the height of screening material and reference point for measurement per DS 2-07.2.2.3.b. A 6' wall is required to screen loading area from adjacent to office zoned property. 3. Except as otherwise provided by this Division, all plant material used for landscaping shall be selected from the Drought Tolerant Plant List LUC 3.2.2.A. Ligustrum lucidum "Glossy Privet" is not on the list choose appropriate plant material. 4. Provide revised calculation for 50% coverage of the street landscape border. Buffers must have shrubs and vegetative ground cover to comply with the coverage requirement of LUC 3.7.2.4. 5. The plant materials used must be installed with the appropriate spacing and must cover more than fifty (50) percent of the area with vegetation Indicate "on center" (o.c.) planting requirements for all ground cover DS 2-06.3.5.B. 6. One (1) canopy tree must be provided for every thirty-three (33) linear feet of street landscape border excluding vehicular ingress or egress points LUC 3.7.2.4. Provide appropriate trees for landscape buffer. 7. Any vegetation higher than thirty (30) inches must be located outside of the sight visibility triangle per LUC 3.7.3.4. 8. Landscape plan shall include irrigation specification design and layout per DS 2-06.5.4.A & DS 2-06.5.4.B including source of irrigation, sleeves for driveways and sidewalks, locations of valves, low-flow bubblers or drip irrigation. 9. The site plan and landscape plan must show identical site layout to avoid conflict between the two plans. Ensure that all changes to the site plan are reflected on the landscape plan. 10. Additional comments may apply. |
| 05/22/2009 | RICK MYERS | PLUMBING-COMMERCIAL | REVIEW | Denied | 1. Revise the current site plan to include the following information: a. All utility easements for parcel 228D b. The size of the yardwater piping, and the location of the RPPBP devices. c. The size of the sanitary sewer extended to the second building. |