Microfiche records prior to 2006 have not been completely digitized and may not be available yet on PRO. If you can not find what you are looking for please submit a records request.
Permit Review Detail
Review Status: Completed
Review Details: COMMERCIAL NEW
Permit Number - T09CM00599
Review Name: COMMERCIAL NEW
Review Status: Completed
| Review Date | Reviewer's Name | Type of Review | Description | Status | Comments |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 03/20/2009 | JOHN WILLIAMS | COMMERCIAL IMPACT FEE | COMMERCIAL IMPACT FEE PROCESSING | Passed | |
| 03/23/2009 | ERIC NEWCOMB | ZONING HC SITE | REVIEW | Approved | |
| 03/23/2009 | ERIC NEWCOMB | BUILDING-COMMERCIAL | REVIEW | Denied | 1. SHEET S5; SHEET S7 (SECTION 103): VERIFY WOOD STUD CONSTRUCTION ON THIS SECTION. SHOULD THIS BE SECTION 106? VERIFY. 2. SHEET S6; JOIST SCHEDULE: THE SIMPSON L50 END CONNECTION PERTAINS ONLY FOR J1 JOIST IN SECTION 205. J1 JOISTS ON THE NORTH AND SOUTH WALLS DO NOT USE THE L50 CONNECTION. ADD NOTE. 3. SHEET S6; SHEET S8 (SECTION 208): THE SECTION IS CUT IN A LOCATION THAT THE TUBE EXTENDS OVER EACH SIDE OF THE COLUMN. VERIFY AND CHANGE AS REQUIRED. 4. SHEET S7: INDICATE ON SECTIONS 102, 103, AND 106 THAT THE BOTTOM OF THE FOOTING IS TO BE A MINIMUM OF 18" BELOW FINISH GRADE. 5. SHEET S7; SECTION 104: REVISE THE BOTTOM OF THE FOOTING TO BE A MINIMUM OF 18" BELOW FINISH GRADE. |
| 03/24/2009 | MARTIN BROWN | FIRE | REVIEW | Approved | |
| 03/27/2009 | STEVE SHIELDS | ZONING | REVIEW | Denied | DSD TRANSMITTAL FROM: Steve Shields Lead Planner PROJECT: 1601 N. Alvernon T09CM00599 Building Plan (1st Review) TRANSMITTAL DATE: March 27, 2009 1. The building plan has been reviewed by Zoning Review Section but cannot approve the plan until all zoning comments or concerns have been addressed. 2. Based on the building elevations and sections the west exterior wall is 16'-0" to finished floor. This said the measurement used for perimeter yard is based on the height of the exterior wall measured from design grade which would make the exterior wall 16'-6". The required perimeter yard would be 12.375', the approved development plan shows a perimeter yard width of 12.0'. Either revise the exterior wall height or the development plan to meet the setback requirements. 3. Zoning will re-review the building plan on the next submittal to insure compliance with the approved and stamped development plan. Additional comments may be forthcoming. If you have any questions about this transmittal, please contact me at Steve.Shields@tucsonaz.gov or (520) 837-4956 C:\planning\grading\t09cm00599.doc RESUBMITTAL OF THE FOLLOWING IS REQUIRED: |
| 04/01/2009 | GERRY KOZIOL | WWM | REVIEW | Denied | site sewer plan & plumbing plan do not match |
| 04/10/2009 | LOREN MAKUS | ENGINEERING | REVIEW | Denied | When the building plans are accepted by the zoning reviewer as matching the development plan, this will be approved by engineering. |
| 04/13/2009 | RAY MAJUTA | ELECTRICAL-COMMERCIAL | REVIEW | Approved | |
| 04/17/2009 | ROBERT SHERRY | PLUMBING-COMMERCIAL | REVIEW | Denied | 1. The plans have been reviewed per the 2006 UPC with local amendments. Sheet C1 calls out using the 2006 IPC for the plumbing design; provide an approved appeal to the building official if the plans are to be reviewed to the 2006 IPC. 2. Coordinate the building sewer and the water service to the building (sheet C1) with the plumbing design for the water service entrance and the building drain as shown on sheet MP-1. Reference: Section 103.2.3, UPC 2006. 3. Provide cleanouts for the building sewer per Section 719.0, UPC 2006. 4. The scupper width appears to be too short to accommodate the design rainfall without exceeding a 2" depth of flow. Provide calculations to support the scupper design or provide structural calculations to show that the roof is capable of supporting the additional rain load. Reference: Sections 1101.11.1 and 1101.11.2.1, UPC 2006, and Section 1611.1, IBC 2006. 5. Provide calculations to show that the size of the overflow in the roof drain collector box has a drainage capacity equal to that of the scupper. Reference: Section 1101.11.2.2.1, UPC 2006. |
| 04/17/2009 | ROBERT SHERRY | MECHANICAL-COMMERCIAL | REVIEW | Approved | |
| 04/17/2009 | ROBERT SHERRY | WATER | REVIEW | Approved |
Final Status
| Task End Date | Reviewer's Name | Type of Review | Description |
|---|---|---|---|
| 05/07/2009 | THAUSER1 | OUT TO CUSTOMER | Completed |
| 05/07/2009 | SUE REEVES | REJECT SHELF | Completed |