Microfiche records prior to 2006 have not been completely digitized and may not be available yet on PRO. If you can not find what you are looking for please submit a records request.
Permit Review Detail
Review Status: Completed
Review Details: COMMERCIAL NEW
Permit Number - T09CM00583
Review Name: COMMERCIAL NEW
Review Status: Completed
| Review Date | Reviewer's Name | Type of Review | Description | Status | Comments |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 03/13/2009 | JOHN WILLIAMS | COMMERCIAL IMPACT FEE | COMMERCIAL IMPACT FEE PROCESSING | Completed | Impact Fee's Do Apply; East District; 5,104 Square Foot Retail Store; $28,167.95 Demolition Permits May be Pulled to Offset Impact Fee's According to Applicant an existing building will be demo'd. |
| 03/16/2009 | DAVE MANN | FIRE | REVIEW | Denied | Please include the following fire sprinkler design criteria to the plans. 1. Flow data (static pressure, residual pressure, GPM) Available from the Fire Department (520) 791-3234 2. The standard to be used in development of sprinkler system. (NFPA 13, NFPA 13R, or NFPA 13D) 3. The hazard classification of the building, including any special hazards. 4. The density required of the water supply. |
| 03/17/2009 | GERRY KOZIOL | WWM | REVIEW | Denied | need PCRWRD- 3RD FLOOR REVIEW- CROSSING 24" PUBLIC SEWER G-75-024 TO INSTALL NEW 4" HCS TO 8" PUBLIC SEWER I-64-037 (740-6369- ROY MONTOYA) NEED 5TH FLOOR CREDIT EVALUATION FOR DEMO OF EXSISTING BLDG- 740-6602/740-6606 |
| 03/18/2009 | JASON GREEN | ENGINEERING | REVIEW | Denied | DATE: March 18, 2009 REVIEWERS: Jason Green, CFM ACTIVITY: T09CM00583 (Building Plan) SUMMARY: Engineering Division of Development Services Department has received the building plan (T09CM00583) for the above referenced property. Engineering Division does not recommend approval of the building plan application at this time. The following items need to be addressed: BUILDING PLAN COMMENTS: Engineering cannot approve the building plan until approval of the proposed Development Plan D08-0047. Provide a copy of the approved Development Plan with the next building plan submittal. Engineering will re-review the building plan on the next submittal to insure compliance with the approved Development Plan. Additional comments may be forthcoming. GENERAL COMMENTS: Further comments may be generated upon re-submittal of the building plan review. For questions or to schedule an appointment I can be reached at 837-4929. Jason Green, CFM Senior Engineer Associate Engineering Division COT Development Services |
| 03/19/2009 | ERIC NEWCOMB | BUILDING-COMMERCIAL | REVIEW | Denied | 1. SHEET 5: THE ACCESSIBILITY SIGNAGE IS TO BE 7'-0" TO BOTTOM OF SIGN. 2. SHEET S1 (FOUNDATIONS); GEOTECHNICAL REPORT (PAGE 6): DESIGN CRITERIA IN THE GEOTECHNICAL REPORT LISTS 2000 PSF ALLOWABLE BEARING PRESSURE AT 1'-6" BELOW GRADE, AND 2500 PSF AT 2'-0" BELOW GRADE. SHEET S1 (FOUNDATIONS NOTE 1) LISTS 2500 PSF AT 1'-6". COORDINATE AND REVIEW OR REVISE ANY CALCULATIONS/DRAWINGS AS REQUIRED. 3. SHEET S1 (FOUNDATIONS); GEOTECHNICAL REPORT (PAGE 5): THE GEOTECHNICAL REPORT(PAGE 5, SECTION 7.1) LISTS THAT THE EXISTING SOILS ARE NOT SUITABLE FOR FOUNDATIONS. SHEET S1 (FOUNDATIONS NOTE 1) NOTES THAT THE FOUNDATIONS COULD BEAR ON UNDISTURBED SOIL. CLARIFY. 4. SHEET S1 (FOUNDATIONS): REMOVE FOUNDATIONS NOTE 4. 5. SHEET S2: PROVIDE CALCULATIONS FOR THE LINTEL AND FOOTING DESIGNS. 6. SHEET S2: ADD A NOTE TO REFERENCE SHEET 4 FOR THE LOCATION OF THIS PLAN. 7. SHEET AB1; FOOTING NOTES: CHANGE NOTE 2 TO REFERENCE THE GEOTECHNICAL REPORT. 8. SHEET AB1; GENERAL NOTES: REVISE NOTE 1 PER THE GEOTECHNICAL REPORT. 9. SHEET S3.1 (FRAMING PLAN); CALCULATIONS SHEET RF7: BEAM B3 ON THE CALCULATIONS IS 2-ANGLES 4 X 3 1/2 X 3/8 (SHEET RF11 INDICATES 1-ANGLE 4 X 3 X 3/8), WHILE THE PLAN INDICATES 2-ANGLES 4 X 3 X 3/8. CLARIFY. 10. SHEET S4.1: PROVIDE STRUCTURAL CALCULATIONS FOR 50 GALLON WATER HEATER SUPPORT. |
| 03/20/2009 | STEVE SHIELDS | ZONING | REVIEW | Denied | DSD TRANSMITTAL FROM: Steve Shields Lead Planner PROJECT: 1884 S. Craycroft Rd T09CM00583 & T09CM00586 Building Plan (1st Review) TRANSMITTAL DATE: March 20, 2009 1. The building plan has been reviewed by Zoning Review Section but cannot approve the plan until all zoning comments or concerns have been addressed. 2. Zoning could not verify that the building plan was in compliance with the approved development package. Please submit two copies of the approved and stamped development, package with the next building plan submittal. 3. Zoning will re-review the building plan on the next submittal to insure compliance with the approved and stamped development plan. Additional comments may be forthcoming. If you have any questions about this transmittal, please contact me at Steve.Shields@tucsonaz.gov or (520) 837-4956 C:\planning\grading\t09cm00583.doc RESUBMITTAL OF THE FOLLOWING IS REQUIRED: |
| 03/20/2009 | ERIC NEWCOMB | ZONING HC SITE | REVIEW | Denied | 1. SEE BUILDING COMMENTS. |
| 03/23/2009 | ROBERT SHERRY | WATER | REVIEW | Approved | |
| 03/24/2009 | ROBERT SHERRY | MECHANICAL-COMMERCIAL | REVIEW | Approved | |
| 03/24/2009 | ROBERT SHERRY | PLUMBING-COMMERCIAL | REVIEW | Denied | 1. Provide water supply isometrics. Reference: Section 103.2.3, UPC 2006. 2. Show that the floor of the restroom slopes toward the floor drain. Reference: Section 411.2, UPC 2006. 3. Appliances to be directly connected to the water supply system that do not have listed, integral backflow preventers or integral air gaps may require reduced pressure principle backflow preventers. Specify the type of backflow prevention device required for each water connection (e.g. coffee, cappuccino, smoothie, etc.). Reference: Section 603.0, UPC 2006, as amended by the City of Tucson. 4. Provide a CW shut off valve for the building entrance. Reference: Section 605.2, UPC 2006. 5. Some of the specified fixtures (Crane water closets and the dishwasher) require a minimum pressure greater than the 15-PSI used in the water pipe sizing calculations. Revise calculations as necessary. Reference: Section 608.1, UPC 2006. 6. Provide a vacuum relief for storage-type water heaters located above any fixture outlets. Reference: Section 608.7, UPC 2006. 7. Clarify which fixtures and appliances are included in the current activity as shown on the Quicktrip equipment schedule and the water demand calculations. Include all fixtures and appliances when calculating the total demand and determining pipe sizes. Reference: Section 610.1, UPC 2006. 8. The fixture branch sizes (1") called out for the water closet flush valves will result in water velocities greater than 8 FPS. Limit the water velocity to less than 8 FPS for the copper piping. Reference: Section A 6.1, UPC 2006 and IS 3-2003, Section 2.6. 9. Provide upper terminal cleanouts on horizontal drainage pipes exceeding 5 feet in length. Horizontal drain lines serving sinks (e.g. the janitor's sink) require cleanouts regardless of length. Reference: Section 707.4, UPC 2006. 10. Coordinate the waste and vent riser diagram with the plumbing floor plan; an extra floor cleanout is shown on the riser diagram near the reach-in cooler. Reference: Section 103.2.3, UPC 2006. 11. Show how and where the flow control device for the hydromechanical grease interceptor shall be installed. Reference: Section 1014.2.1, UPC 2006. 12. Floor drains or floor sinks subject to infrequent use shall be provided with an approved means of maintaining their water seals. Approved means of maintaining trap seals include listed trap seal primers or a hose bibb within the room. Reference: Section 1007.1, UPC 2006, as amended by the City of Tucson. 13. Provide the trap and trap arm size for the floor drains (D) on the waste and vent riser diagram. Reference: Section 103.2.3, UPC 2006. 14. Coordinate the roof drainage design (sheet P2.3) and the building storm sewer design (civil sheet 7 of 24). Reference: Section 1106.2, UPC 2006. 15. Show how the roof drain leader is to connect to the building storm sewer. Reference: Sections 103.2.3 and 1101.12.2, UPC 2006. |
| 03/25/2009 | RAY MAJUTA | ELECTRICAL-COMMERCIAL | REVIEW | Approved |
Final Status
| Task End Date | Reviewer's Name | Type of Review | Description |
|---|---|---|---|
| 03/31/2009 | CINDY AGUILAR | OUT TO CUSTOMER | Completed |
| 03/31/2009 | SUE REEVES | REJECT SHELF | Completed |