Microfiche records prior to 2006 have not been completely digitized and may not be available yet on PRO. If you can not find what you are looking for please submit a records request.
Permit Review Detail
Review Status: Completed
Review Details: RESUBMITTAL - SITE ALL
Permit Number - T09CM00578
Review Name: RESUBMITTAL - SITE ALL
Review Status: Completed
| Review Date | Reviewer's Name | Type of Review | Description | Status | Comments |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 04/20/2009 | DAVE MANN | FIRE | REVIEW | Approv-Cond | Fire lane signs per IFC Appendix D are required. |
| 04/20/2009 | RONALD BROWN | ZONING HC SITE | REVIEW | Denied | 1. For all ramps, show handrail in compliance with ICC/ANSI 2203, Section 505, Handrails, specifically section 505.10, Extensions. Make revisions ot all ramps and stairs. 2. Provide a "Van Accessible" sign attached to pole just below the main sign. 3. Bottom of main sign is to be mounted 7' above finished grade as per COT/DOT directive. 4. At detail V/SP5, make railing continous at landing. |
| 04/20/2009 | STEVE SHIELDS | ZONING | REVIEW | Denied | DSD TRANSMITTAL FROM: Steve Shields Lead Planner PROJECT: St. Augustine Catholic High School - Multipurpose Building T09CM00578 Site Plan (2nd Review) TRANSMITTAL DATE: April 22, 2009 COMMENTS: Please resubmit revised drawings and a response letter, which states how all Zoning Review Section comments regarding the Land Use Code and Development Standards were addressed. 1. This site plan was reviewed for compliance with the City of Tucson Development Standards (D.S.) and Land Use Code (LUC). Based on the provided expansion calculations this review if full code for the area of work only. 2. This comment was not addressed. Based on Keynote 21 new bicycle parking is proposed. Provide a detail including materials for lighting, paving, and security; fully dimensioned layout; location; specific type of rack and the number of bicycles it supports. D.S. 2-02.2.1.A.9 Show the required off-street bicycle parking locations on the site plan. Provide a detail including materials for lighting, paving, and security; fully dimensioned layout; location; specific type of rack and the number of bicycles it supports. 3. This comment was not addressed. The SVTs shown on sheet SP2 do not appear to be shown correctly and no future SVTs have been provided. Contact your Engineering reviewer for correct existing and future SVTs. D.S. 2-02.2.1.A.10 Show existing and future sight visibility triangles (SVTs) on the plan for the entrance off of 22nd Street. 4. This comment was not fully addressed. Provide dimensions for all existing PAALS on site and the northern most PAAL of the new parking area. D.S. 2-02.2.1.A.11 Provide a width dimension for all parking area access lanes (PAALs) on site. 5. This comment was not fully addressed. Zoning acknowledges that a "PROPOSED MONUMENT SIGN" is shown on the plan. Provide size, and height or note the proposed sign as "PROPOSED MONUMENT SIGN UNDER SEPARATE PERMIT". D.S. 2-02.2.1.A.13 If applicable show the location, type, size, and height of existing and proposed signage on the site plan. 6. This comment was not addressed. D.S. 2-02.2.1.A.21 Show the location of future curb along 22nd Street. 7. This comment was not fully addressed. Provide the zoning for the parcels located on the north side of 22nd Street. D.S. 2-02.2.1.A.28 Provide existing zoning of parcel and adjacent parcels, including those across streets and alleys on the site plan. 8. Depending on how the above comments are addressed addition comments may be forth coming. If you have any questions about this transmittal, please contact me at Steve.Shields@tucsonaz.gov or (520) 837-4956. C:\planning\site\t09cm00578-2nd RESUBMITTAL OF THE FOLLOWING IS REQUIRED: Revised site plan and additional requested documents. |
| 04/29/2009 | LOREN MAKUS | ENGINEERING | REVIEW | Denied | I will review the updated plan over the counter as we discussed. |
| 04/30/2009 | JOE LINVILLE | NPPO | REVIEW | Denied | See Landscape Comments. |
| 04/30/2009 | JOE LINVILLE | LANDSCAPE | REVIEW | Denied | 1) A 10' wide street landscape border ten (10) feet wide (as measured from the street property line) per LUC 3.7.2.4.A is required along the entire street frontage. Provide dimensions for the landscape border (exclusive of vehicle overhang areas) on the site and landscape plans. If the landscape border extends into the public right-of-way, approval form the City Engineer, in writing is required prior to plan approval. 2) Revise the landscape plans to locate the 5' high screen along S Olympic Park Dr. in accordance with LUC 3.7.3.2. The screen may only be located in the street landscape border only if it meets the specified criteria. 3) Revise the calculation for vegetative coverage for the street landscape border. Per DS 2-06.3.7, a vegetative screen is not calculated as part of the vegetative coverage. 4) Revise the plans to clarify the extent of the regulatory floodplain on sheet SP6. If there is encroachment into the regulated area, DS 9-06.1.1 requires submittal of Environmental Resource Report and that the riparian habitat on the site be identified and delineated as the Protected Riparian Area. Alterantely, the plans may be revised to show no disturbance of the regulatory floodplain. 5) Revise the Native Plant Preservation to adjust the grading limits such that the grading or disturbance does not occur within 1 and 1/2 times the radius of plants identified as Preserved In Place. LUC 3.8.6.7.C 6) Revise the Native Plant Preservation and Landscape Plans and/or the site/grading plans such that a proposed channel is not shown in the same location as the Preserved in Place plants. DS 2-15.3.4.A |
| 05/04/2009 | CAGUILA1 | PLUMBING-COMMERCIAL | REVIEW | Needs Review |