Microfiche records prior to 2006 have not been completely digitized and may not be available yet on PRO. If you can not find what you are looking for please submit a records request.

Permit Number: T09CM00570
Parcel: 14016003F

Review Status: Completed

Review Details: RESUBMITTAL

Permit Number - T09CM00570
Review Name: RESUBMITTAL
Review Status: Completed
Review Date Reviewer's Name Type of Review Description Status Comments
04/21/2009 ERIC NEWCOMB BUILDING-COMMERCIAL REVIEW Denied 1. SHEET A1; CONTRACTOR NOTE IN THE TITLE BLOCK: THIS STATEMENT CHARGING THE CONTRACTOR TO VERIFY "ALL CODES AND ORDINANCES" IS NOT THE RESPONSIBILITY OF THE CONTRACTOR, BUT THE REGISTERED DESIGN PROFESSIONAL(S). REVIEW IBC SECTION 106 AND MODIFY THE NOTE.
2. SHEET A4; SCREEN WALL DETAIL: PROVIDE THE SCREEN WALL FOOTING WIDTH AND REINFORCING. ENLARGE THE LETTERING TO A MINIMUM OF 3/32".
3. SHEET GSN; FOUNDATIONS: THE ENGINEER OF RECORD IS TO ESTABLISH THE ALLOWABLE SOIL BEARING AND THE REQUIRED DEPTH OF THE FOUNDATIONS PER THE IBC. LIST THAT CRITERIA IN THE GENERAL NOTES, AND REFERENCE DRAWINGS TO THOSE NOTES.
4. PROVIDE A RESPONSE LETTER TO THESE REVIEW COMMENTS.
04/28/2009 ROBERT SHERRY MECHANICAL-COMMERCIAL REVIEW Denied The keynotes for the condensate drain piping (#9 and #12) do not appear on drawing MP1; keynote #1shows on the drawing but points to blank paper. Clarify the termination points for the relocated and the new condensate drains. (Note that keynote #11 also does not seem to appear on the mechanical floor plan.) Reference: Section 106.3.1, IMC 2006.
04/28/2009 TERRY STEVENS ZONING REVIEW Denied 04/28/2009

Development Services Department
Zoning Review Section

Terry Stevens
Lead Planner

Comments:

1. The building plan has been reviewed by Zoning Review Section but cannot approve the plan until it has been approved by the Engineering, and Landscape Review Sections and until all zoning comments or concerns have been addressed.

2. Zoning could not verify that the building plan was in compliance with the approved development plan. Please submit two copies of the approved and stamped development, landscape, and NPPO plans with the next building plan submittal.

3. Zoning will re-review the building plan on the next submittal to insure compliance with the approved site/development plan. Additional comments may be forthcoming.

Final Status

Task End Date Reviewer's Name Type of Review Description
05/06/2009 DELMA ROBEY OUT TO CUSTOMER Completed