Permit Review Detail
Review Status: Completed
Review Details: COMMERCIAL NEW
Permit Number - T09CM00550
Review Name: COMMERCIAL NEW
Review Status: Completed
| Review Date | Reviewer's Name | Type of Review | Description | Status | Comments |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 03/11/2009 | MARTIN BROWN | FIRE | REVIEW | Denied | Please show location of existing fire hydrant(s) with dimensions to property lines. They must be within 500' (as the hose lays) of all parts of the building. |
| 03/11/2009 | JOHN WILLIAMS | COMMERCIAL IMPACT FEE | COMMERCIAL IMPACT FEE PROCESSING | Passed | |
| 03/13/2009 | ERIC NEWCOMB | BUILDING-COMMERCIAL | REVIEW | Denied | 1. SHEET A0.2; SHEET E5.0 (LIGHT POLE): ARE ALL LIGHT POLES 20' MAXIMUM HEIGHT? IF GREATER, A STRUCTURAL ANALYSIS FOR THE POLE FOUNDATION IS REQUIRED. 2. SHEET A6.2: AS PER THE PLUMBING FIXTURE SPECIFICATION SCHEDULE, THE OVERFLOW ROOF DRAIN (ORD) IS TO HAVE A 2" HIGH DAM. PER DETAIL 12/A6.2, IT APPEARS AS THE DAM IS UPSIDE DOWN. VERIFY. 3. SHEET S103; DETAILS 119 AND 122: THE PARTITION SUPPORT TO AND SUSPENSION FROM ALL STRUCTURAL TJI'S ARE TO HAVE FULL LENGTH (TO TOP AND BOTTOM CHORD) WEB STIFFENERS AS PER THE MANUFACTURER'S RECOMMENDATION. PLEASE NOTE THIS ON THE DRAWING DETAILS. 4. SHEET S300 (ROOF FRAMING PLAN); SHEET S500 (DETAILS 503 AND 504): ARE DETAILS 503 AND 504 REVERSED? CLARIFY. 5. ARCHITECT SHOULD SEAL, SIGN, AND DATE THE SPECIFICATIONS. REMOVE ITEMS LISTED IN THE SPECIFICATIONS THAT ARE NOT PERTINENT TO THIS PROJECT. |
| 03/16/2009 | ERIC NEWCOMB | ZONING HC SITE | REVIEW | Approved | |
| 03/19/2009 | RAY MAJUTA | ELECTRICAL-COMMERCIAL | REVIEW | Approved | |
| 03/23/2009 | STEVE SHIELDS | ZONING | REVIEW | Approved | |
| 03/26/2009 | GERRY KOZIOL | WWM | REVIEW | Approved | |
| 04/02/2009 | ROBERT SHERRY | PLUMBING-COMMERCIAL | REVIEW | Denied | Note: Plumbing review for the shell building limited to roof drain piping, piping at the roof structure or in the walls, and piping below the slab. 1. Provide the civil plans called out on sheet A0.2 that show the work to be done on the water service and building sewer piping. Note that sheet A0.2 appears to show a backflow preventer for the irrigation piping but not for the building water service and no connection to the public sewer is shown. 2. Clarify how locating the shutoff valve for the water service to the building in the fire riser room complies with the accessibility requirements of Section 605.2, UPC 2006. 3. Show the slope of the horizontal rainwater pipes located along column line 7 on the plans. Confirm that the pipe capacity conforms to the requirements of Table 11-2. Reference: Section 1106.2, UPC 2006. |
| 04/03/2009 | ROBERT SHERRY | MECHANICAL-COMMERCIAL | REVIEW | Denied | Revise the energy compliance statement on sheet M9.1 to correspond to the building shown on the drawings. Approximately half of the windows have a projection factor much less than 0.25, not greater than 0.50 as noted. The architectural drawings and specifications have conflicting descriptions of the fenestration types, none of which seems to be "all other". |
| 04/03/2009 | ROBERT SHERRY | WATER | REVIEW | Denied | Provide the civil plans called out on sheet A0.2 that show the work to be done on the water service piping. Note that sheet A0.2 appears to show a backflow preventer for the irrigation piping but not for the building water service. |
| 04/06/2009 | LOREN MAKUS | ENGINEERING | REVIEW | Approved | |
| 04/13/2009 | JEFF DRUMM | LANDFILL | REVIEW | Approved |
Final Status
| Task End Date | Reviewer's Name | Type of Review | Description |
|---|---|---|---|
| 04/14/2009 | CPIERCE1 | OUT TO CUSTOMER | Completed |