Microfiche records prior to 2006 have not been completely digitized and may not be available yet on PRO. If you cannot find what you are looking for please submit a records request.

Permit Review Detail

Permit Number: T09CM00441
Parcel: 13322500G

Review Status: Completed

Review Details: COMMERCIAL NEW

Permit Number - T09CM00441
Review Name: COMMERCIAL NEW
Review Status: Completed
Review Date Reviewer's Name Type of Review Description Status Comments
11/12/2009 ERIC NEWCOMB ADA REVIEW Passed
11/13/2009 MARTIN BROWN FIRE REVIEW Approved
11/16/2009 RICK MYERS PLUMBING-COMMERCIAL REVIEW Denied 1. See sheet P-1 detail 1: water heaters. Reference 608.7 2006 UPC. Water heaters located at an elevation above the fixture outlets in the hot water system shall be installed with a vacuum relief valve. 2. Three compartment sinks are to be directly connected to the sanitary sewer system. One compartment may be indirectly wasted if it is a vegetable prep. sink, or a sanitizing bowl. 3. Include how the public use lavatories are limited to 110 degrees fahrenheit. Reference; 413.1 2006 UPC, and 504.3 2006 IECC. 4. Include how the domestic water system is to be sterilized. Reference 609.9 2006 UPC. 5. Each water supplied appliance is to have backflow protection. These include, but are not limited to: Carbonators, ice makers, coffee brewers, iced tea dispensers, beverage towers. Show size, location, and model of each such backflow device.
11/16/2009 RONALD BROWN ZONING HC REVIEW Approved
11/16/2009 RMYERS1 WATER REVIEW Approved
11/17/2009 GERRY KOZIOL WWM REVIEW Denied 1:IN & OUT BURGER- ISSUED W/ GREASE INTERCEPTOR & W/ 4" DUMPSTER TRENCH DRAIN COVERED WITH A NON-REMOVABLE HINGED LID.
2:NEEDS WASTEWATER 5TH FLOOR CREDIT EVALUATION FOR EXSISTING RESTAURANT BUILDING DEMO'D.
3:NEEDS 3RD FLOOR PCRWRD REVIEW & APPROVAL OF LOCATION/METHOD OF CONNECTION TO PUBLIC SEWER PER DON WILLHOIT
11/20/2009 RAY MAJUTA ELECTRICAL-COMMERCIAL REVIEW Denied Project: 7111 E Broadway Bl, T09CM00441
In N Out Burger, Restaurant



The Electrical Plans have been denied for the following:

1. The Electrical Engineer is required to sign the Electrical Sheets.
2. Provide size of conductor to be used for the Grounding Electrode System.
3. Sheet E-11, the cut sheet for the KSFS 250 and 400 MH fixtures does not indicate the lumen count for them, provide these for review.
4. The calculation for the Outdoor Lighting Ordinance review shows36,000 lumens for the 400MH fixture and 25,000 lumens for the 250MH fixture. The fixture schedule shows 38,000 lumens for the 400 MH fixture and 22,500 lumens for the 250 MH fixture ?

Please review each and provide a response for each.


Ray T Majuta
Elect Plan Ck, DPDS-- City of Tucson,
11/22/09
Ray.Majuta@tucsonaz.gov
11/23/2009 ERIC NEWCOMB BUILDING-COMMERCIAL REVIEW Denied 1. Demolition of existing building must be under separte demolition permit and must have it's own final.
2. Minimum letting size including upper and lower case is 3/32". Please revise all drawings accordingly.
3. Need to provide Special Inspection Certifications for special inspections as summerized on sheet S1.1.
4. On Sheet T1.0, the occupant load must include the patio occupants for calculation of toilet fixtures required by Chapter 29. Please revise count and recalculate your toilet fixture count.
5. Reference Site Plan Sheet A4.0: As per Table 602, Fire Separation Distance, the drive thru patio structure, sitting no less than approximately 18" from the property line, must have a 1 hour fire separation.
6. Please submit a letter of summary for all deferred submittals to Mr. LeeRay Hanley.
7. Please provide structural calculations for the roof top mounted HVAC systems, Water Heaters and etc.

STRUCTURAL PLAN REVIEW COMMENTS FOR T09CM00441
ERIC NEWCOMB

8. SHEET S1.0 (FOUNDATION NOTE 2); GEOTECHNICAL REPORT (PAGE 5): THE GEOTECHNICAL REPORT SPECIFIES AN ALLOWABLE BEARING CAPACITY OF 2500 PSF AT A MINIMUM DEPTH OF 18" BELOW LOWEST FINISHED EXTERIOR GRADE, WHILE THE PLANS SPECIFY 2500 PSF AT A DEPTH OF 12" BELOW LOWEST ADJACENT COMPACTED SUBGRADE. CLARIFY.
9. SHEET S3.0; SHEET SD5 (SECTION 4): SECTION 4 INDICATES A 4X BEAM, WHILE THE PLAN INDICATES 6X6. CLARIFY.
10. SHEET S3.0; SHEET SD7 (DETAIL 8B): DETAIL 8B INDICATES A 5 1/4 X 14 SCL HEADER, WHILE THE PLAN INDICATES A 5 1/4 X 11 7/8 SCL. CLARIFY.
11. SHEET S3.0; SHEET S5.0 (SECTION 13): SECTION 13 INDICATES THE ROOF TRUSS BEARING ON WALL STUDS, WHILE THE SECTION CUT AT THE SW CORNER OF THE BUILDING HAS A HEADER. CLARIFY.
12. GENERAL: MINIMUM 3/32" TALL LETTERING IS REQUIRED ON ALL DRAWINGS. REVISE SHEET S3.0.
13. GENERAL: PROVIDE WRITTEN RESPONSES TO ALL REVIEW COMMENTS.

END OF REVIEW
11/23/2009 BETH GRANT COMMERCIAL IMPACT FEE COMMERCIAL IMPACT FEE PROCESSING Approved
12/03/2009 PAUL MACHADO ENGINEERING REVIEW Approved
12/04/2009 ROBERT SHERRY MECHANICAL-COMMERCIAL REVIEW Denied 1. Provide plans sealed by an Arizona Registrant. Reference: Arizona Revised Statutes 32-125, Board of Technical Registration Rules R4-30-304.
2. Sign and seal the Compliance Statement for the energy conservation code calculations. Reference: Arizona Revised Statutes 32-125, Board of Technical Registration Rules R4-30-304.
3. Revise the energy code analysis, coordinating the building components (e.g. the roof insulation and the glazing) used in the analysis with those shown on the drawing. Reference: Section 302.2, IECC 2006, as amended by the City of Tucson.
4. Include the electrical tower in the envelope energy calculations. Reference: Section 302.2, IECC 2006, as amended by the City of Tucson.
5. Provide calculations demonstrating that the provided ventilation meets the requirements of Section 403.3, IMC 2006, as amended by the City of Tucson.
6. Show that the hood installation complies with Sections 507.9 and 507.10, IMC 2006 for clearances.
12/07/2009 STEVE SHIELDS ZONING REVIEW Approved

Final Status

Task End Date Reviewer's Name Type of Review Description
12/15/2009 SUE REEVES OUT TO CUSTOMER Completed
12/15/2009 SUE REEVES REJECT SHELF Completed