Microfiche records prior to 2006 have not been completely digitized and may not be available yet on PRO. If you can not find what you are looking for please submit a records request.
Permit Review Detail
Review Status: Completed
Review Details: COMMERCIAL NEW
Permit Number - T09CM00440
Review Name: COMMERCIAL NEW
Review Status: Completed
| Review Date | Reviewer's Name | Type of Review | Description | Status | Comments |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 02/26/2009 | DAVE MANN | FIRE | REVIEW | Denied | Please add the following automatic sprinkler criteria to the plans: 1. The hazard classification of the occupancy including any special hazards. 2. The design standard to be used. 3. The availability and adequacy of the water supply. 4. The design density and the area of operation. |
| 02/27/2009 | ERIC NEWCOMB | BUILDING-COMMERCIAL | REVIEW | Denied | 1. DEFERRED SUBMITTALS MUST BE APPROVED BY THE BUILDING OFFICIAL, JESSIE SANDERS. 2. SHEET SD1; SECTION 8: PROVIDE STRUCTURAL ENGINEERING CALCULATIONS FOR DESIGN OF LIGHT POLE FOUNDATION (LIGHT POLE IS 28' HIGH). 3. SHEET A3.0 (ACCESSIBLE SANITARY FACILITIES ELEVATION); SHEET A19.0 (MEN'S RESTROOM INTERIOR ELEVATIONS): LOCATE THE ROLL PAPER HOLDER 7" TO 9" IN FRONT OF THE WATER CLOSET PER ANSI FIGURE 604.7(a). 4. SHEET A3.0; GENERAL: THERE IS GENERIC INFORMATION ON THIS SHEET THAT DOES NOT AGREE WITH SITE/BUILDING ACTUAL CONDITIONS (ACCESSIBLE RESTROOM STALL SIZE, DIMENSION TO THE BOTTOM OF THE VAN ACCESSIBLE SIGN, CLEAR WIDTH ON THE ACCESSIBLE WALK WHERE BOLLARD OCCURS, ETC.). PLEASE REVIEW THIS SHEET AND REVISE FOR SPECIFIC ISSUES ON THIS PROJECT. 5. GENERAL: PLEASE BE ADVISED THAT ALL REGISTERED DESIGN PROFESSIONALS MUST STAMP, SIGN, AND DATE ALL SHEETS THEY ARE RESPONSIBLE FOR. 6. SHEET A19.0; RESTROOM ELEVATIONS: REFERENCE WP-2 FOR WALL FINISH. WHAT IS THIS AND WHERE IS IT SPECIFIED IN A TABLE? IS THIS IN AGREEMENT WITH SHEET A20.0 WALL TYPE OF W5? CLARIFY THAT THIS FINISH MEETS IBC SECTION 1210. 7. GENERAL: MAKE SURE ALL LETTERING IS MINIMUM 3/32" TALL. THERE ARE PORTIONS OF SEVERAL SHEETS THAT DO NOT MEET THIS CITY OF TUCSON REQUIREMENT. 8. SHEET S3.0; CALCULATIONS SHEET 3.1: IN THE KITCHEN AREA, THERE ARE TWO BEAMS NOTED ON THE CALCULATIONS AS HDR-1 (6X8). THESE DO NOT SHOW UP ON SHEET S3.0. VERIFY. 9. SHEET SD2; SECTIONS 9 AND 10: SECTION CUT 6/SD6 IS INCORRECT. REVISE. 10. SHEET SD5; SECTION 2: SECTION CUT 4/SD5 ON SECTION 2 SHOULD BE ADDED. |
| 03/02/2009 | JOHN WILLIAMS | COMMERCIAL IMPACT FEE | COMMERCIAL IMPACT FEE PROCESSING | Completed | Impact Fee's Do Apply; Central District; 4,859 Square Foot Restaurant; $22,032.11 |
| 03/03/2009 | ERIC NEWCOMB | ZONING HC SITE | REVIEW | Denied | 1. SEE BUILDING COMMENTS. |
| 03/13/2009 | RAY MAJUTA | ELECTRICAL-COMMERCIAL | REVIEW | Approved | Project: T09CM00440 1719 E AJO WY IN OUT BURGER Electrical plans for this project have been rejected for the following items, correct individually and show how each was addressed. 1. Electrical Engineer required to sign and date plans. 2. Cannot read the kitchen equipment sheets, they are too light, provide darkened copies. 3. Sheet E-6 shows MA-1 going to MS-20, should be MS-18. 4. Sheet E-4 shows circuit D-14 going to the telephone board, the panel space is not identified. 5. Sheet E-4 shows C-15 being used also marked spare in panel. 6. Sheet E-4 , MS-14 is shown going to junction in kitchen area, but is shown on Sheet E-2 going to Panel A. 7. Sheet E-4 , MS-15 is shown going to junction in kitchen area, but is shown on Sheet E-2 going to Panel B. 8. Sheet E-4 , MS-16 is shown going to junction in kitchen area, but is shown on Sheet E-2 going to Panel C. Ray T Majuta Elect Plan Check DSD City of Tucson 520-837-4988 3-15-09 |
| 03/16/2009 | ROBERT SHERRY | PLUMBING-COMMERCIAL | REVIEW | Denied | 1. Provide plans sealed by an Arizona Registrant. A permanently legible imprint of the registrant's seal and signature, along with the date the documents were sealed and the day, month, and year of the expiration of current registration, shall appear on each sheet of the construction drawings. Reference: Arizona Revised Statutes 32-125, Board of Technical Registration Rules R4-30-304. 2. Provide plumbing plans and reference drawings that are legible. Sheets P-2, P-3, P-4, P-5, and the kitchen sheets, K-2 through K-8.2 are not legible. Additional comments may be made after legible drawings are received. Reference: Section 103.2.3, UPC 2006. 3. Coordinate the plumbing drawings and the civil drawings with respect to the location of the water service entrance to the building. Reference: Section 103.2.3, UPC 2006. 4. Provide upper terminal cleanouts on horizontal drainage pipes exceeding 5 feet in length (horizontal drain lines serving sinks and urinals require cleanouts regardless of length). Reference: Section 707.4, UPC 2006. 5. Revise the 4" cleanouts for the grease waste and the sanitary waste drains on the north side of the building as shown on sheet P-7per Section 707.6, UPC 2006. 6. Modify trap arm lengths to conform to Table 10-1, UPC 2006 (e.g. 5'- 0" for 2", 6'- 0" for 3", and 10'- 0" for 4"). Reference: Section 1002.2, UPC 2006. 7. Provide a vacuum relief for storage-type water heaters located above any fixture outlets. Reference: Section 608.7, UPC 2006. 8. The gas piping to the grills does not appear to be on sheet P-3 and the pipe sizes shown on sheet P-6 for the grills do not appear to be based on the stated developed length of 130 feet. Show all of the gas piping on the plumbing plan and include the developed pipe lengths on the gas riser diagram. Reference: Section 1217.0, UPC 2006. |
| 03/16/2009 | ROBERT SHERRY | WATER | REVIEW | Approved | |
| 03/17/2009 | ROBERT SHERRY | MECHANICAL-COMMERCIAL | REVIEW | Denied | 1. Provide plans sealed by an Arizona Registrant. A permanently legible imprint of the registrant's seal and signature, along with the date the documents were sealed and the day, month, and year of the expiration of current registration, shall appear on each sheet of the construction drawings. Reference: Arizona Revised Statutes 32-125, Board of Technical Registration Rules R4-30-304. 2. Provide mechanical plans and reference drawings that are legible. Sheets M-3, M-4, and portions of M-5, and the kitchen sheets, K-2 through K-8.2 are not legible. Additional comments may be made after legible drawings are received. Reference: Section 103.2.3, UPC 2006. 3. Provide energy code compliance calculations using the correct climate zone for Pima County < 4,000 feet. Coordinate the information on the drawings with the criteria used to evaluate the energy compliance of the building envelope. The information shown on the drawings (A10.0 and A10.1) indicates R-30 roof insulation in the roof framing cavities but not continuous R-6 insulation on the roof as shown on the calculations, the wall sections on the drawings do not show a continuous R-5 insulation like the calculations, and the fenestration notes on the drawings call for a maximum glazing U-factor of 0.75 and a maximum SHGC of 0.25 which does not agree with the information shown on the energy calculations. Confirm that the areas used for the calculations match the areas shown on the plans, including the tower computer room. Reference: Sections 101.4 and 104.2, International Energy Conservation Code 2006. 4. Sign and seal the Compliance Statement for the energy conservation code calculations. Reference: Arizona Revised Statutes 32-125, Board of Technical Registration Rules R4-30-304. 5. Provide calculations demonstrating adequate ventilation. Reference: Section 401.2, IMC 2006. 6. Provide information to show that the operation of the Type I hoods and the hood exhaust fans comply with Section 507.2.1.1, IMC 2006. 7. Provide smoke detectors in the return air duct, upstream of any outside air connections, for all air distribution systems with a capacity greater than 2,000 CFM and serving multiple rooms. Reference: Section 606.1, IMC 2006. |
| 03/18/2009 | TERRY STEVENS | ZONING | REVIEW | Denied | 03/18/2009 Development Services Department Zoning Review Section Terry Stevens Lead Planner Comments: 1. The building plan has been reviewed by Zoning Review Section but cannot approve the plan until it has been approved by the Engineering, and Landscape Review Sections and until all zoning comments or concerns have been addressed. 2. Zoning could not verify that the building plan was in compliance with the approved development plan. Please submit two copies of the approved and stamped development, landscape, and NPPO plans with the next building plan submittal. 3. Zoning will re-review the building plan on the next submittal to insure compliance with the approved site/development plan. Additional comments may be forthcoming. |
| 03/18/2009 | GERRY KOZIOL | WWM | REVIEW | Denied | connecting to on-site 8" private sewer #pt06s05210 with 6" private connection- need revised copy of on-site private sewer drawings dated April 2007 per utility plan- need wastewater re-review of joint sewer use agreements for newly created property lines (Ilene Deckard- 740-6544) |
| 03/25/2009 | LOREN MAKUS | ENGINEERING | REVIEW | Needs Review | This will be approved on the next submitted plan set. |
Final Status
| Task End Date | Reviewer's Name | Type of Review | Description |
|---|---|---|---|
| 04/24/2009 | CPIERCE1 | OUT TO CUSTOMER | Completed |
| 04/24/2009 | SUE REEVES | REJECT SHELF | Completed |