Microfiche records prior to 2006 have not been completely digitized and may not be available yet on PRO. If you can not find what you are looking for please submit a records request.
Permit Review Detail
Review Status: Completed
Review Details: SITE
Permit Number - T09CM00312
Review Name: SITE
Review Status: Completed
| Review Date | Reviewer's Name | Type of Review | Description | Status | Comments |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 02/12/2009 | DAVE MANN | FIRE | REVIEW | Approved | |
| 02/12/2009 | RBROWN1 | ADA | REVIEW | Passed | NOT A COT PROJECT |
| 02/12/2009 | ANDREW CONNOR | LANDSCAPE | REVIEW | Denied | 1. A street landscape border, per LUC 3.7.2.4, is a landscape area with a minimum width of ten (10) feet, running the full length of the street property line(s) bounding the site except for points of ingress-egress. On streets designated as Major Streets and Routes (MS&R), the street landscape border is measured from the MS&R right-of-way line as determined by LUC 2.8.3.4. Dumpster can not be located in 10' landscape border. 2. Street landscape borders shall be located entirely on site, except that, if approved by the City Engineer or designee, up to five (5) feet of the required ten (10) foot width be placed within the adjacent right-of-way area. Provide approval documentation for use of ROW. 3. Provide acceptable documentation, which clearly indicates that the project will not impact Protected Native Plants. Choose correct option on Application for Exception or Submit a NPPO plan per DS 2-15.0. From the photographs submitted it appears that native plants are located on-site. 4. The site plan and landscape plan must show identical site layout to avoid conflict between the two plans. Ensure that all changes to the site plan are reflected on the landscape plan. 5. Additional comments may apply. |
| 02/17/2009 | ANDREW CONNOR | NPPO | REVIEW | Denied | Provide acceptable documentation, which clearly indicates that the project will not impact Protected Native Plants. Choose correct option on Application for Exception or Submit a NPPO plan per DS 2-15.0. From the photographs submitted it appears that native plants are located on-site. |
| 02/25/2009 | TERRY STEVENS | ZONING | REVIEW | Denied | DSD TRANSMITTAL FROM: Terry Stevens Lead Planner PROJECT: T09CM00312 3148 E. 2nd Street Site Plan TRANSMITTAL DATE: 2/26/08 COMMENTS: Please resubmit revised drawings along with redlines and a response letter, which states how all Zoning Review Section comments regarding the Land Use Code and Development Standards were addressed. 1. DS 2-02.2.1.2 Per Pima County assessors records the alley located along the south of the project has not been abandoned nor purchased from the City of Tucson. Provide recording documentation (docket and page) for the abandonment and purchase on the site plan. Contact the Real Estate division of the City of Tucson regarding the abandonment. A tax parcel combination for all four parcels must be completed prior to approval of the site plan. Provide documentation indicating approval of the tax parcel combination. Revise the legal description to accurately describe the parcel once the parcel combination has been completed. 2. DS 2-02.2.1.4 A small, project-location map shall be drawn on the first sheet of the development plan, preferably in the upper right corner. The map should cover approximately one (1) square mile, be drawn at a minimum scale of 3" = 1 mile, and provide the following information. 1. Show the subject property approximately centered within the one (1) square mile area. 2. Identify conditions within the square mile area, such as major streets and watercourses. 3. Section, township, and range; section corners; north arrow; and the scale will be labeled. 3. DS 2-02.2.1.5 Provide the bearings as well as the distances of property lines for the portion of the alley which measures 10' X 80'. 4. DS 2-02.2.1.7 The site plan as submitted is using developing area setbacks for distances along 2nd St. This property does not qualify for developing area setbacks and is required to use developed area setbacks (see LUC Sec. 3.2.6.5.A) which requires a setback along a street frontage of 20' or 1 ½ times the wall height of the structure, which ever is greater, from the property line. The dormer wall height of 19'-6" would require a setback from the street property line of 29'-3". The dormer wall height appears to be the governoring height but all walls must meet the required setbacks. Provide dimensions from the street property line to all walls of units #5, #6, and #7. This project which is zoned O-3 has a development designator of BB. Per LUC Sec. 3.2.6.4 when adjacent to Office zoned property, which is the case along the west property line, the required setback is the height of the structure. The wall height of the dormer for units #2 and #1 indicated as 19'-6" would then require a setback of 19'-6" from the west property line. Revise. Revise the notes in zoning code check portion to the correct setback criteria. For example: Anderson Blvd. is a side street setback 10' required, south setback 10' or ¾ the height, west setback height of the structure wall, 2nd St. 20' or 1 ½ times the height of the structure. Revise general notes also in regards to setbacks, note #4 Provide the height of the wall for the proposed porch structures in order to verify setbacks for units #1 and #5. 5. DS 2-02.2.1.8 Clearly indicate the location of the wheel stops for the parking spaces. Minimum of 2'-6" from the front of the parking space. In the parking calculations clearly indicate the number of bedrooms for each unit. Indicate that each unit is a single family residence 6. DS 2-02.2.1.9 Please provide a plan view detail of the proposed class 2 bicycle parking spaces. Single rack spaces placed in a row will allow a minimum of seventy -two (72) inch length per bicycle parking space and a minimum of thirty (30) inches between outer spaces of racks. A five (5) foot wide access aisle measured from the front or rear of the seventy-two (72) inch long parking space will be provided beside each row. Lighting will be provided such that all facilities are thoroughly illuminated and visible from adjacent sidewalks, parking lots, or buildings, during working hours. The surface of the facility can be surfaced the same as for motor vehicle parking or with a minimum of one (1) inch thickness of one-fourth (1/4) inch aggregate material. DS 2-09.5.1, DS2-09.5.2, DS 2-09.5.4, & DS 2-09.6.2 Provide a detail clearly indicating the type of class two bicycle rack being proposed. See DS 2-09 Figures 2 and 3 for the acceptable types of racks. Revise bicycle parking calculations to reflect that 20 vehicle parking spaces are being provided. Bicycle parking is based on the number of provided parking spaces not on the required. 7. DS 2-02.2.1.13 If applicable, provide location, type, size, and height of existing and proposed signage. 8. DS 2-02.2.1.20 If applicable, all easements of record and proposed easements must be shown on the plan together with recording docket and page. 9. DS 2-02.2.1.31 In the zoning code check portion of the site plan indicate the use of this project as Family Dwelling "L". Remove the R-3 from the use and the subject to: section. There are no subject to sections for family dwelling in the O-3 zoning classification. It is not a occupancy group but a proposed use. Revise. Revise general notes also in regards to setbacks, note #4. 10. Depending on changes made to this site plan and responses to the above comments additional comments may be forth coming. If you have any questions about this transmittal, please call Terry Stevens, (520) 837-4961 C:\planning\cdrc\DSD\T09CM00312.doc RESUBMITTAL OF THE FOLLOWING IS REQUIRED: Revised site plan and additional requested documents |
| 02/26/2009 | RONALD BROWN | ZONING HC SITE | REVIEW | Approved | |
| 03/11/2009 | BIANCA RAMIREZ | ENGINEERING | REVIEW | Denied | DATE: March 10, 2009 SUBJECT: Site Plan TO: Wally Gasser LOCATION: 3148 E 2nd Street, T14S, R14E, Section 9, Ward 6 REVIEWERS: Bianca Ramirez, CFM ACTIVITY: T09CM00312 (First Review) RESUBMITTAL REQUIRED: Site Plan SUMMARY: Engineering Division of Development Services Department has received and reviewed the proposed site plan for the above referenced property. Engineering Division does not recommend approval of the site plan at this time. Please address the following review comments prior to the next submittal. Please include a response letter to the comments along with the corrected copies of the site plan. Site Plan: 1. The most recent aerial photo of the building does not match what is depicted on the site plan. Clarify the difference in the dimensions of parcel and the footprint of existing and proposed buildings. If the existing structures indicate on site plan are to be demoed, call out on site plan. If there has already been a demo permit issued for the demolition of the existing structures then provide a demo permit number in the lower right hand corner of plan. It even appears that a lot combination may need to be completed. Clarification needed. 2. Please verify that all text is a minimum of 0.12 fonts. 3. Please provide property description per D.S. 2-02.2.1.2. Property description does not match for address provided. 4. Please provide project address per D.S. 2-02.2.1.3. There appears to be multiple parcels provided. If lot combo is needed to be done, please do so and provide assigned address for combined parcel. 5. Please provide location map per D.S. 2-02.2.1.4. Revise project location map to be approximately one (1) square mile, drawn at a minimum of 3" = 1mile, and provide the following information: 1. Show the subject property approximately centered within the one (1) square mile area. 2. Identify conditions within the square mile area, such as major streets and watercourses. 3. Provide Section, Township, and range; section corners; and scale. Label accordingly. 6. Please label lot dimensions and bearings per D.S. 2-02.2.1.5. Current dimensions of lot do not match the parcel outline being shown in MapGuide. 7. Provide all existing and proposed buildings and structures, including location, size, height, overhangs, canopies, and use per D.S. 2-02.2.1.6. 8. Label existing and future sight visibility triangles per D.S. 2-02.2.1.10. Provide proof from the transportation department that there is on street parking. An email to Bianca Ramirez @ bianca.ramirez@tucsonaz.gov will suffice. 9. Label all points of egress and ingress including locations and width of driveway per D.S. 2-02.2.1.11. 10. DS Sec.2-02.2.1.A.11 & DS Sec.3-01.3.2.C: label curb radii concrete curbs at the driveway entrance along Anderson Blvd. 11. Label the closest adjacent driveway along Anderson Blvd. The nearest pavement edges should be spaced at least eighty feet apart. For questions in regard to Transportation Management Guidelines please contact Jose Ortiz, Civil Engineer, for questions. 12. Please verify that all vehicular, bicycle, pedestrian, and handicapped circulation are labeled and clearly identified per D.S. 2-02.2.1.12. 13. Fully dimensioned loading space(s) and maneuvering area(s) per D.S. 2-02.2.1.14. Offsite maneuverability is not permitted, unless a variance is granted and all conditions within the LUC3.4.4.3.A. If onsite maneuverability can not be achieved then a variance must be submitted and approved for offsite maneuvering within the public right-of-way. The site plan and grading plan can not be approved until such variance is approved. Refer to AASHTO for the national standards for turning radii. 14. Please provide Drainage patterns and provide additional spot elevations for finished grades per D.S. 2-02.2.1.16. 15. DS Sec.2.02.2.1.A.16: Provide drainage arrows and locations of all concentration points. Specifically show roof down spout locations proposed buildings at pedestrian circulation areas. A detail for the dimension of the proposed scuppers that are used for collecting onsite roof drainage at all pedestrian sidewalk is required, refer to City of Tucson details. Any scuppers proposed under the sidewalk will be designed and constructed to convey the 10-year flood flow. Provide a drainage statement showing scupper calculations that demonstrate that the 10-year flood flow is contained under the sidewalk. 16. Please label dimensioned right-of-way, including any applicable right-of-way per D.S. 2-02.2.1.19. Provide existing and future right of way, label accordingly. If the right of way is already to future width, label as existing/future right of way. 17. DS Sec. 2-05.2.4.H.2: Provide the right-of-way (ROW) recordation information for Anderson Blvd and 2nd Street. 18. Verify that all easement of record are graphically shown on the plan together with recording docket and page per D.S. 2-02.2.1.20. 19. Dimension from street monument lines to existing and proposed curbs, sidewalks, driveways, and utility lines per D.S. 2-02.2.1.21. 20. Please provide existing topographic contours at intervals not exceeding two (2) feet and/or spot elevations as pertinent and Bench Mark based on City of Tucson Datum, including City Field Book and page number per D.S. 2-02.2.1.23. Provide contour interval on the plan. 21. Verify that all fences, walls, or vegetation for screening are shown along with sight visibility by type, material, height, location and spacing per D.S. 2-02.2.1.27. 22. Show Site plan activity number in the lower right hand corner of each sheet per D.S. 2-02.2.1.29. 23. See refuse contained detail enclosed and ensure that all components are called out within detail in accordance with the detail. 24. DS Sec.2-02.2.1.A.32: Label and show the maneuverability for refuse vehicles in plan view at the proposed refuse container location. Current positioning of trash area does not allow for 14' X 40' clear approach, show access dimensioning to proposed trash enclosure. Clear approach depicted indicates 30', please revise accordingly. 25. A permit or a private improvement agreement will be necessary for any work performed within the Right-of-way. Contact Permits and Codes at (520) 791-5100 for permit information. 26. Please show a typical cross section of the P.A.A.L. or call out the percentage of slopes. Call out the GB at the D/W, if applicable 27. Additional comments may be forthcoming. If you have any questions, I can be reached at 837-4928 or Bianca.Ramirez@tucsonaz.gov Bianca C. Ramirez Engineering Associate City of Tucson/Development Services Department 201 N. Stone Avenue P.O. Box 27210 Tucson, Arizona 85726-7210 (520) 837-4928 office (520) 879-8010 fax |
| 03/12/2009 | ROBERT SHERRY | PLUMBING-COMMERCIAL | REVIEW | Denied | 1. Designing the site plumbing constitutes the practice of engineering. Provide plans sealed by an Arizona Registrant. Reference Arizona Revised Statutes 32-125, Board of Technical Registration Rules R4-30-304. 2. The rim elevation of the next upstream sanitary manhole or cleanout (2475.04') is less than 12" below the first floor elevations of the seven apartment units. Provide a backwater valve per Section 710.1, UPC 2006, as amended by the City of Tucson. |
Final Status
| Task End Date | Reviewer's Name | Type of Review | Description |
|---|---|---|---|
| 03/13/2009 | THAUSER1 | OUT TO CUSTOMER | Completed |
| 03/13/2009 | SUE REEVES | REJECT SHELF | Completed |