Microfiche records prior to 2006 have not been completely digitized and may not be available yet on PRO. If you cannot find what you are looking for please submit a records request.

Permit Review Detail

Permit Number: T09CM00267
Parcel: 12218274A

Review Status: Completed

Review Details: SITE

Permit Number - T09CM00267
Review Name: SITE
Review Status: Completed
Review Date Reviewer's Name Type of Review Description Status Comments
02/04/2009 MARTIN BROWN FIRE REVIEW Approved
02/04/2009 STEVE SHIELDS ZONING REVIEW Denied DSD TRANSMITTAL

FROM: Steve Shields
Lead Planner

PROJECT: Tucson Federal Credit Union - Office Building Parking Lot Reconfiguration.
T09CM00267
Site Plan (1st Review)

TRANSMITTAL DATE: February 6, 2009

COMMENTS: Please resubmit revised drawings and a response letter, which states how all Zoning Review Section comments regarding the Land Use Code and Development Standards were addressed.

1. This site plan was reviewed for compliance with the City of Tucson Development Standards (D.S.) and Land Use Code (LUC) for full code compliance for the parking area reconfiguration only. As a vehicle use area expansion calculation and a site area expansion calculation was not provided on this site plan additional comments may be forth coming once the above calculation have been provided.

2. Either a Pima County Lot Combination and a Covenant Regarding Development and Use of Real Property or a cross access agreement for all of Tucson Federal Credit Union's parcels will be required once the alley has been abandoned. At a minimum lots 122-18-274A, 122-18-2730 and the abandoned alley will need to be combined utilizing the above documents.

3. Also some type of cross access agreement will be needed for parcel 122-18-2720, owned by Our Town Family Center, as they currently have access to the alley.

4. The abandonment of the alley must occur prior to the approval of this site plan if the proposed parking is the back out into the existing alley.

5. D.S. 2-02.2.1.A.7 Zoning acknowledges that the required one (1) foot setback from the proposed covered parking to the parking area access lane is shown on detail 12/C3, please shown the one (1) setback on the site plan.

6. D.S. 2-02.2.1.A.8 Detail 2/C3 the wheel stop dimension is not shown correctly, see D.S. 3-05.2.3.C.2 and D.S. 3-05.0 Figure 5.

7. D.S. 2-02.2.1.A.10 Show all required sight visibility triangles (SVT's) on the site plan.

8. D.S. 2-02.2.1.A.12 Provide a dimension from the east edge of the PAAL to the east property line.

9. D.S. 2-02.2.2.A.1 Once the alley is abandoned and combined with the other parcels revised the Site Area.

10. D.S. 2-02.2.2.A.3 Provided a floor area ratio (FAR) allowed and provided on the plan.

11. D.S. 2-02.2.2.A.4 Provide a vehicle parking calculation that includes the required and provided. Per discussions with Staff this calculation will include the site to the south. Zoning recommends that the calculation reads as follows:
Existing office building:
1st Floor 12,775/200 = 64
2nd Floor 6,025/250 = 24
Total = 88
Existing Credit Union 6,000/175 = 35
Total Required = 123
Total Provided = 132

12. D.S. 2-02.2.2.A.6 Provide a vehicle use area expansion calculation on the plan.

13. D.S. 2-02.2.2.A.6 Provide a lot area expansion calculation on the plan. The alley abandonment constitutes a lot area expansion.

14. Depending on how the above comments are addressed addition comments may be forth coming.

If you have any questions about this transmittal, please contact me at Steve.Shields@tucsonaz.gov or (520) 837-4956.

C:\planning\site\t09cm00267

RESUBMITTAL OF THE FOLLOWING IS REQUIRED: Revised site plan and additional requested documents.
02/05/2009 RBROWN1 ADA REVIEW Passed NOT A COT PROJECT
02/09/2009 PAUL MACHADO ENGINEERING REVIEW Approv-Cond Label existing and future sight visibility triangles per D.S. 2-02.2.1.10.
02/09/2009 RONALD BROWN ZONING HC SITE REVIEW Denied 1. AT THE MARKED CROSSING:
A. AT THE SOUTH END, PROVIDE A DETECTABLE WARNING STRIP JUST PRIOR TO PAAL ENTRY AS PER ICC ANSI 117.1, SECTION 406.14.
B. AT THE NORTH END, RELOCATE THE DETECTABLE WARNING IN THE CONCRETE WAY, ACCESSIBLE ROUTE.
C. THE TWO DETECTABLE WARNINGS SHOWN AT THE TOP OF BOTH SIDEWALK RAMPS ARE NOT REQUIRED BY CODE.
2. PROVIDE SPOT GRADES TYHROUGH OUT ACCESSIBLE ROUTES SHOWING COMPLIANCE WITH ICC ANSI 1171, SECTION 403.3
3. IDENTIFY THE "VAN ACCESSIBLE" SPACE ON THE SITE PLAN.
4. AT DETAIL 11/C3: FINE TO BE $532.00
5. AT DETAIL 2/C3:
A. RELOCATE DETECTABLE WARNING TO THE CONCRETE ACCESSIBLE ROUTE.
B. DETECTABLE WARNING AT THE TOP OF THE SIDEWALK RAMP IS NOT REQUIRED BY CODE.
02/18/2009 ANDREW CONNOR NPPO REVIEW Approved
02/19/2009 JOE LINVILLE LANDSCAPE REVIEW Denied Revise the site plans as necessary to comply with the requests of other agencies. Revise the landscape plans as necessary to conform to the site plan. DS 2-07.2.2
02/24/2009 ROBERT SHERRY PLUMBING-COMMERCIAL REVIEW Passed

Final Status

Task End Date Reviewer's Name Type of Review Description
03/02/2009 CINDY AGUILAR OUT TO CUSTOMER Completed
03/02/2009 SUE REEVES REJECT SHELF Completed