Microfiche records prior to 2006 have not been completely digitized and may not be available yet on PRO. If you can not find what you are looking for please submit a records request.
Permit Review Detail
Review Status: Completed
Review Details: RESUBMITTAL - SITE ALL
Permit Number - T09CM00265
Review Name: RESUBMITTAL - SITE ALL
Review Status: Completed
| Review Date | Reviewer's Name | Type of Review | Description | Status | Comments |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 02/03/2010 | MARTIN BROWN | FIRE | REVIEW | Denied | Thank you for showing the hydants. However, the Fire Department needs a turnaround with a minimum outside turning radius of 53'-6" (inside radius 36'). Please modify turnaround |
| 02/04/2010 | RONALD BROWN | ZONING HC | REVIEW | Denied | 1. OK 2. PROVIDE NOTE EXPLANING EXACTLY WHERE YOU HAVE CURBS THAT ARE FLUSH WITH THE PAVEMENT OR PROVIDE A POCH'E SYMBOLS LEGEND. Resubmittal Comment: There are what appears to be three loading zones. For all passenger loading zones, there must be one accessible loading zone with a vehicle pull up space, a separate 5' wide access aisle and a curb ramp of some type or flush asphalt surface to the concrete accessible route to access the building with detectable warnings. Please define which of these loading zones are for passengers and please comply with the 2006 IBC, Chapter 11, Section 1106.7 and ICC (ANSI) 117.1, section 503. 3. AT BOTH PASSENGER LOADING ZONES, COMPLY WITH 2006 IBC CHAPTER 11, SECTION 1106.7 AND ICC ANSI 117.1 SCETION 503. Resubmittal Comments:See comments above at comment 2. 4. AT ACCESSIBLE PARKING DETAIL PROVIDE THEFOLLOWING: a. OK b. OK c. OK d. AT THE EASTERLY END OF THE MARKED CROSSING, PROVIDE A DETECTABLE WARNING STRIP IN THE ACCESSIBBLE ROUTE AS PER ICC ANSI 117.1, SECTION 406.12 AND PROVIDE A SIDEWALK RAMP AS PER ICC ANSI SECTION 405. Resubmittal Comments: Delete the two detectable warning strips shown in the sidewalk and provide one just in the side walk prior to entering the PAAL at the begining of the marked crossing. 5. OK End of Review |
| 02/09/2010 | TERRY STEVENS | ZONING | REVIEW | Denied | DSD TRANSMITTAL FROM: Terry Stevens Lead Planner PROJECT: T09CM00265 3050 N. Swan Rd. Site Plan TRANSMITTAL DATE: 02/11/09 COMMENTS: Please resubmit revised drawings along with redlines and a response letter, which states how all Zoning Review Section comments regarding the Land Use Code and Development Standards were addressed. 1. DS 2-02.2.1.2 The tax parcel combo appears to have been completed. Provide documentation showing that the covenant regarding development and use of real property has been recorded. Provide docket and page recording information for the covenant on the site plan. 2. DS 2-02.2.1.9 Bicycle parking provided on the site plan does not meet the requirements of revised DS (Development Standard) 2-09. Per DS 2-09.4.1 Class 2 bicycle parking facilities will be located no more than fifty (50) feet from the main building entrance(s) and will be along the front side of the building as well as along other sides of the building that has an entrance. The above comment, per discussion with Erin, will be addressed through the DSMR process. Provide on the plan the DSMR case number, date of approval, what the request is for and any conditions of approval. Place the DSMR case number near the lower right corner of all sheets. 3. DS 2-02.2.1.11 Provide the recording docket and page information for all easements. 4. DS 2-02.2.1.12 The proposed pedestrian circulation path indicated as connecting to the adjacent property will be required to be constructed of concrete and physically separated from vehicular use areas. ( at the north ends of the existing carport covers) The landing area indicated at the landscape island will also be required to be constructed of concrete. Truncated domes will be required at the ends of the sidewalks where they connect to the striped crosswalks. See handicap comments. 5. DS 2-02.2.1.14 The indicated curved loading zone does not meet the requirements of the 12X35 area required. Revise. (straightening of the inside line to meet the 12X35 would meet this requirement) 6. Based on changes to the plan and responses to above comments additional comments may be forth coming. If you have any questions about this transmittal, please call Terry Stevens, (520) 837-4961 C:\planning\cdrc\DSD\T09CM00265-2.doc |
| 02/10/2010 | ANDREW CONNOR | NPPO | REVIEW | Denied | The plant appraisal shall be conducted according to the most current methods and procedures accepted by the Council of Tree and Landscape Appraisers. Submit an example of the Appraisal Worksheet to verify methods of valuation per LUC 3.8.6.3.A |
| 02/10/2010 | ANDREW CONNOR | LANDSCAPE | REVIEW | Denied | The plant appraisal shall be conducted according to the most current methods and procedures accepted by the Council of Tree and Landscape Appraisers. Submit an example of the Appraisal Worksheet to verify methods of valuation per LUC 3.8.6.3.A |
| 02/17/2010 | LOREN MAKUS | ENGINEERING | REVIEW | Approved | |
| 02/19/2010 | RICK MYERS | PLUMBING-COMMERCIAL | REVIEW | Denied | 1.Provide site drawing showing the size and route of the building water supply along with the location and size of both the water meter and the reduced pressure backflow preventer assembly. Reference: Section 103.2.3, UPC 2006. 2.Show inverts and slope of the building sewer line on drawing. Reference: Sections 103.2.3, UPC 2006. |
Final Status
| Task End Date | Reviewer's Name | Type of Review | Description |
|---|---|---|---|
| 09/17/2010 | CPIERCE1 | OUT TO CUSTOMER | Completed |
| 09/17/2010 | SUE REEVES | REJECT SHELF | Completed |