Microfiche records prior to 2006 have not been completely digitized and may not be available yet on PRO. If you can not find what you are looking for please submit a records request.
Permit Review Detail
Review Status: Completed
Review Details: SITE
Permit Number - T09CM00265
Review Name: SITE
Review Status: Completed
| Review Date | Reviewer's Name | Type of Review | Description | Status | Comments |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 02/04/2009 | MARTIN BROWN | FIRE | REVIEW | Denied | Fire sprinklers or site redesign will be required. Hydrant over 300 lf hose lay to back of building. Parking area does not provde a turnaround per Development Standards. |
| 02/05/2009 | RBROWN1 | ADA | REVIEW | Passed | NOT A COT PROJECT |
| 02/09/2009 | TERRY STEVENS | ZONING | REVIEW | Denied | DSD TRANSMITTAL FROM: Terry Stevens Lead Planner PROJECT: T09CM00265 3050 N. Swan Rd. Site Plan TRANSMITTAL DATE: 02/11/09 COMMENTS: Please resubmit revised drawings along with redlines and a response letter, which states how all Zoning Review Section comments regarding the Land Use Code and Development Standards were addressed. 1. DS 2-02.2.1.2 This site contains two (2) separate tax parcels therefore you will need to show how the parcels can work as stand alone parcels if sold separately or provide a Pima County Tax Parcel Combo and a recorded covenant regarding development and use of real property. 2. DS 2-02.2.1.6 Provide dimensions of the foot print of the proposed structure on the site plan. 3. DS 2-02.2.1.8 Provide a dimensioned detail of a standard parking space clearly indicating the required 2'-6" space for the location of the wheel stop. Wheel stops will be required at the handicap parking spaces also. 4. DS 2-02.2.1.9 Please provide a dimensioned detail for class 1 and class 2 bicycle parking spaces clearly dimensioned and indicating type of rack proposed. Please provide a plan view detail of the proposed class 2 bicycle parking spaces. Single rack spaces placed in a row will allow a minimum of seventy -two (72) inch length per bicycle parking space and a minimum of thirty (30) inches between outer spaces of racks. A five (5) foot wide access aisle measured from the front or rear of the seventy-two (72) inch long parking space will be provided beside each row. Lighting will be provided such that all facilities are thoroughly illuminated and visible from adjacent sidewalks, parking lots, or buildings, during working hours. The surface of the facility can be surfaced the same as for motor vehicle parking or with a minimum of one (1) inch thickness of one-fourth (1/4) inch aggregate material. Bicycle parking provided on the site plan does not meet the requirements of revised DS (Development Standard) 2-09. Per DS 2-09.4.1 Class 2 bicycle parking facilities will be located no more than fifty (50) feet from the main building entrance(s) and will be along the front side of the building as well as along other sides of the building that has an entrance. 5. DS 2-02.2.1.11 The concrete header indicated by keynote #9 does not meet the requirement of DS 3-05.2.3.C.1. Vehicle use areas must be provided with wheel stop curbing or barriers to prevent vehicles from driving onto unimproved portions of the property. Clearly indicate the location of all wheel stop curbing. Provide the recording information (docket and page) for the ingress/egress/utility easement located on the property to the west which provides access to this project. 6. DS 2-02.2.1.12 The pedestrian circulation path indicated as connecting to the adjacent property will require a revised site plan for the changes made to the site. Per the aerial photos it appears the connection of the sidewalk will eliminate parking spaces thus requiring the change to the site plan. Clearly indicate how the change to the pedestrian circulation path will affect the adjacent site. Indicate location of handicap ramps, sidewalks and cross walks. A pedestrian cross access agreement between the two property owners will be required to be provided. Provide a copy for review and provide the recording information (docket and page) for the agreement on the site plan. 7. DS 2-02.2.1.14 Clearly indicate the location and size of the required 2nd loading zone. The passenger drop area cannot be used as a loading zone. Clearly indicate vehicle maneuverability for both loading zones. See engineering comments. Clearly indicate the height and width clearance of the proposed canopy sign. Minimum height clearance is 15' (DS 3-05.2.1.4.a) and minimum width clearance of 28' (DS 3-05.2.2.B.3). 8. Based on changes to the plan and responses to above comments additional comments may be forth coming. If you have any questions about this transmittal, please call Terry Stevens, (520) 837-4961 C:\planning\cdrc\DSD\T09CM00265.doc |
| 02/09/2009 | RONALD BROWN | ZONING HC SITE | REVIEW | Denied | 1. PROVIDE CONCRETE WHEEL STOPS IN BOTH ACCESSIBLE SPACES. 2. PROVIDE NOTE EXPLANING EXACTLY WHERE YOU HAVE CURBS THAT ARE FLUSH WITH THE PAVEMENT OR PROVIDE A POCH'E SYMBOLS LEGEND 3. AT BOTH PASSENGER LOADING ZONES, COMPLY WITH 2006 IBC CHAPTER 11, SECTION 1106.7 AND ICC ANSI 117.1 SCETION 503. 4. AT ACCESSIBLE PARKING DETAIL PROVIDE THEFOLLOWING: a. RELOCATE ACCESSIBLE PARKING SIGNS TO A POINT JUST BEHING THE CONCRETE HEADER IN THE CONCRETE WALKWAY (ACCESSIBLE ROUTE) b. PROVIDE CONCRETE WHEEL STOPS IN BOTH ACCESSIBLE PARKING SPACES c. PROVIDE A DETECTABLE WARNING IN THE PARKING AISLE JUST PRIOR TO CROSSING THE PAAL AS PER ICC ANSI 117.1 406.14. d. AT THE EASTERLY END OF THE MARKED CROSSING, PROVIDE A DETECTABLE WARNING STRIP IN THE ACCESSIBBLE ROUTE AS PER ICC ANSI 117.1, SECTION 406.12 AND PROVIDE A SIDEWALK RAMP AS PER ICC ANSI SECTION 405. 5. ON THE SITE PLAN, IDENTIFY WHICH SPACE IS TO BE THE "VAN ACCESSIBLE SPACE". |
| 02/23/2009 | LOREN MAKUS | ENGINEERING | REVIEW | Denied | February 24, 2009 T09CM00265 and T09BU00163 Provide a comparison of existing and proposed water surface elevations to demonstrate that the project will not cause adverse impacts on the adjacent properties. Clearly show and discuss the impact of this development on the existing buildings on the UofA property. Show the FFE of the northern building. The drainage report doesn't clearly show the split flow in the off-site discharge. Include information about the size of the existing swale in the drainage exhibits. Show the location, dimensions and grades for the swale on the adjacent property that is conducting the majority of the regulatory flood discharge. Explain how that this will be perpetuated into the future. The access and to the refuse collection location doesn't meet the requirements of the development standards. The access routes to and from the refuse collection location must provide a minimum outside radius of 50 feet and a minimum inside radius of 36 feet. Show the accessibility and maneuverability routes on the site plan. Provide clear specifications, location and alignment of the basin outlet. If the basin outlet must be installed into the adjacent private drainageway, show agreements with the adjacent property owner allowing the construction and maintenance of the outlet structure. This plan is presented as a site and grading plan which is acceptable. Provide sufficient construction details for the various features on the site. Show general dimensions and construction details and specifications for all drainage structures, rip rap areas, basins, refuse enclosures and other construction features. For example, show the locations of the required bollards protecting the side walls and the gates for the enclosure. Clearly show the proposed grades for tops and toes of all slopes in representative locations. Show how water harvesting and detention basins will hold the amount of water called for in the drainage report. Note that a floodplain use permit is required for this project. Submit a completed Floodplain Use Permit application along with the $50.00 application fee and $150 drainage review fee. Continue to include copies of the SWPPP with subsequent submittals and revise as necessary to remain consistent with the site and grading plans. |
| 02/24/2009 | ANDREW CONNOR | NPPO | REVIEW | Denied | Site Appraisal. A plant appraisal shall be prepared which shall identify and state the financial value of each Protected Native Plant which is proposed to be removed from the site, damaged, or destroyed and shall be keyed to the Native Plant Inventory per Development Standard 2-15.3.1. The plant appraisal shall be conducted by a certified arborist according to the most current methods and procedures accepted by the Council of Tree and Landscape Appraisers. A plant professional (see Sec. 3.8.4.4) who can demonstrate competence in appraisal methodologies, through participation in an approved Western International Society of Arboriculture plant appraisal workshop, may also conduct a plant appraisal according to the most current methods and procedures accepted by the Council of Tree and Landscape Appraisers. (Ord. No. 9246, §1, 10/11/99) |
| 02/24/2009 | ANDREW CONNOR | LANDSCAPE | REVIEW | Denied | Site Appraisal. A plant appraisal shall be prepared which shall identify and state the financial value of each Protected Native Plant which is proposed to be removed from the site, damaged, or destroyed and shall be keyed to the Native Plant Inventory per Development Standard 2-15.3.1. The plant appraisal shall be conducted by a certified arborist according to the most current methods and procedures accepted by the Council of Tree and Landscape Appraisers. A plant professional (see Sec. 3.8.4.4) who can demonstrate competence in appraisal methodologies, through participation in an approved Western International Society of Arboriculture plant appraisal workshop, may also conduct a plant appraisal according to the most current methods and procedures accepted by the Council of Tree and Landscape Appraisers. (Ord. No. 9246, §1, 10/11/99) |
| 03/04/2009 | ROBERT SHERRY | PLUMBING-COMMERCIAL | REVIEW | Denied | Provide cleanouts in the building sewer at intervals not exceeding 100 feet. Reference: Section 719.1, UPC 2006. |
Final Status
| Task End Date | Reviewer's Name | Type of Review | Description |
|---|---|---|---|
| 03/11/2009 | DELMA ROBEY | OUT TO CUSTOMER | Completed |
| 03/11/2009 | SUE REEVES | REJECT SHELF | Completed |