Microfiche records prior to 2006 have not been completely digitized and may not be available yet on PRO. If you can not find what you are looking for please submit a records request.
Permit Review Detail
Review Status: Completed
Review Details: COMMERCIAL NEW
Permit Number - T09CM00249
Review Name: COMMERCIAL NEW
Review Status: Completed
| Review Date | Reviewer's Name | Type of Review | Description | Status | Comments |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 02/03/2009 | DAVE MANN | FIRE | REVIEW | Denied | Please indicate fire hydrant locations on plan. Show location of proposed "No Parking - Fire Lane" signs. Please be advised that alarms and sprinklers are separate and deferred submittals, so approval of these plans will not constitute approval of sprinkler and fire alarm systems. It appears there may be a small community kitchen. This may require a Type 1 hood and fire suppression system. Check with Mechanical reviewer. Also, FP sheets show a double check backflow preventer. Tucson Fire would prefer this is NOT installed. Check valve on riser is sufficient protection. |
| 02/03/2009 | GERRY KOZIOL | WWM | REVIEW | Denied | 1:CASA DEL PUEBLO II-S07-121 38 APT UNITS 2:CONNECTING TO EXSISTING ON-SITE PRIVATE SEWER 3:NEED IWC REVIEW & APPROVAL OF ELEVATOR SUMP DRAIN INDIRECT TO FS WITHOUT OIL/SAND SEPARATOR- TOM TOMCHAK- 443-6200 4:NEED WASTEWATER REVIEW OF LOCATION OF CONNECTION THROUGH ADJACENT PROPERTY WITH PRIVATE UTILITY EASEMENT- PCRWRD 3RD FLOOR ILENE DECKARD -740-6544 5:NEED TO PERMIT 6" ON-SITE PRIVATE SEWER-NEED COPY OF PLAN FOR 8TH FLOOR BASE MAP UPDATE- NEED DEQ REVIEW & APPROVAL OF ON-SITE PRIVATE SEWER- 740-3340 |
| 02/03/2009 | JASON GREEN | ENGINEERING | REVIEW | Denied | cannot approve until S07-121 is approved |
| 02/04/2009 | JOHN WILLIAMS | COMMERCIAL IMPACT FEE | COMMERCIAL IMPACT FEE PROCESSING | Completed | Impact Fee's Do Apply; West District; 38 Units; 29,322 Square Foot Multi-Family Units; $128,854.14* * A 5% annual increase will take effect on March 2, 2009 if permit has not been pulled prior to this date. |
| 02/09/2009 | ERIC NEWCOMB | BUILDING-COMMERCIAL | REVIEW | Denied | 1. A MINIMUM OF 3/32" LETTERING IS REQUIRED ON ALL DRAWINGS UNLESS A WRITTEN APPEAL IS APPROVED BY THE BUILDING OFFICIAL, JESSIE SANDERS. THIS APPROVED APPEAL MUST ACCOMPANY THE DRAWINGS SUBMITTED FOR CHECKING. 2. SHEET A1.0; PROJECT DATA: VERIFY THE TYPE OF CONSTRUCTION. VA CONSTRUCTION IMPLIES ANY CODE ALLOWED MATERIALS ARE PROTECTED WITH SOME TYPE OF FIRE RESISTANT MATERIALS (NOT AUTOMATIC SPRINKLER SYSTEMS). IF THIS IS ACTUALLY A VB TYPE OF CONSTRUCTION, PLEASE REVIEW THE ALLOWABLE AREA AND HEIGHT PER TABLE 503. 3. GENERAL: VERIFY ALL DWELLING/SLEEPING UNITS NOT LABELED AS ACCESSIBLE (TYPE A UNITS) MEET ICC/ANSI A117.1-2003 TYPE B UNITS PER SECTION 1004. 4. GENERAL: VERIFY ALL SLEEPING UNITS ON THE SECOND FLOOR MEET IBC SECTION 1107 REQUIREMENTS FOR ACCESSIBILITY DUE TO ELEVATOR SERVICE. 5. SHEET A8.1; WALL TYPES: PROVIDE CONNECTIONS FOR THE TOP OF THE WALLS TO THE STRUCTURE ABOVE TO MEET IBC SECTION 1607.13 REQUIREMENTS. INDICATE CONNECTION SIZE, QUANTITY, AND SPACING AS REQUIRED. 6. SHEETS A2.0/2.1 (FLOOR PLAN); SHEET A7.0 (BUILDING SECTIONS): SECTION REFERENCES ARE REVERSED. MODIFY TO MATCH. 7. SHEETS A2.0/2.1 (FLOOR PLAN); SHEET A7.1 (SECTION 3): THE SECTION CUT AT THE NORTH WALL ON SHEETS A2.0/2.1 DOES NOT MATCH THE SECTION ON SHEET A7.1. REVISE. 8. SHEETS A2.0/2.1 (FLOOR PLAN); SHEET A7.1 (SECTION 1): THE SECTION CUT ON SHEETS A2.0/2.1 DOES NOT MATCH THE SECTION ON SHEET A7.1. REVISE. 9. SHEET A4.0 (UNIT PLANS); SHEET A4.1 (ROOM ELEVATIONS): IT IS UNCLEAR WHICH ELEVATIONS GO WITH WHICH PLANS. PLEASE CLARIFY. 10. SHEET A4.1: PROVIDE VERTICAL GRAB BAR AND TOILET PAPER DISPENSER IN BATH ELEVATIONS. INDICATE WALLS PER IBC SECTION 1210.2. 11. SHEET S2.3 (FRAMING PLAN); CALCULATIONS SHEET 4.11: THE FLOOR BEAM FB6 IN THE CALCULATIONS IS NOT INDICATED ON THE DRAWING. CLARIFY. |
| 02/20/2009 | TERRY STEVENS | ZONING | REVIEW | Approved | |
| 02/23/2009 | ROBERT SHERRY | PLUMBING-COMMERCIAL | REVIEW | Denied | The applicable code for all commercial plumbing projects is the 2006 Uniform Plumbing Code with Local Amendments. Provide an approved appeal to the building official if the plans are to be reviewed to the 2006 IPC. |
| 02/23/2009 | ROBERT SHERRY | WATER | REVIEW | Denied | Tucson Water limits a 2" meter to a maximum demand of 80 GPM. Provide a letter from Tucson Water confirming that the use of a 2" water meter will be allowed for this project. |
| 02/24/2009 | ROBERT SHERRY | MECHANICAL-COMMERCIAL | REVIEW | Denied | 1. Provide energy code compliance calculations (use Pima County < 4,000 feet). Provide sufficient detail on the drawings to evaluate the energy compliance of the building envelope. The information shall, as a minimum, include U-factors of the fenestration components. Reference: Sections 101.4 and 104.2, International Energy Conservation Code 2006. 2. Provide a Type I hood over all domestic cooking appliances (e.g. the range in room C-204) used for commercial purposes. Reference: Section 507.2.3, IMC 2006. 3. Show the size, routing, and termination of the secondary condensate drains for FC-4 and FC-5. Reference: Section 307.2, IMC 2006 and Section 814.0, UPC 2006. 4. Show how the fan coils are being connected to the building structure (no details are shown in the structural drawings) and provide calculations to show that the building structure is not being adversely affected. Reference: Section 302.1, IMC 2006. 5. Clarify details 2/M3.2 and 3/M3.2 with regard to the mounting of the condensing units; the plans indicate that they are mounted on grade, not the roof. Reference: Section 106.3.1, IMC 2006. |
| 03/02/2009 | RAY MAJUTA | ELECTRICAL-COMMERCIAL | REVIEW | Denied | Project: 4975 S Liberty Av T09CM00249 Senior Housing / Apts The electrical plans have been denied for the following, 1. The size of conductors, conduits, and number of paralleled sets which are to be used for the service entrance conductors are listed on sheet E1.0 , are also to be printed on sheet E5.1, the one line diagram where only the conduits are shown. 2.Sheet E5.0 the load for the range on the individual unit panels are listed as 9000va which equal 43.2 amps at 208 v, the panel has a 40 amp cb for over-current protection. 3. Sheet E5.0, the load calculations for the one bedroom panels are only single phase using 240 volts. DSA load= 910860 va times .29= 264149.4 divided by 240 v=1100.6. If divided by 208 v amount woul be 1270 amps, the system voltage is 120/208v 3 phase.Also what will happen to the un-used third leg ? There are three 3 phase panels evenly loaded , while 38 of the single phase unit panels are single phase , which do not show a rotation on the three phase system.Overall the system is not balanced. 4.Heating and cooling receptacles are missing on the roof for CU units. 5.The water heater circuits 20,22 should be 22,24. They are different on the power plan. 6. Bell transformers on the power plan show going to circuit 12, panel schedule shows blank. 7. Sheet E5.1 showing the feeders from the MCR with 3 1/0's and a #6 after a 150 main CB going to a first floor panel, then somehow the feeders change to # 2 conductors and feed the 2nd floor panel. These # 2 feeders to the second floor panels cannot be protected by the same 150 a CB. Can you clerify this? Ray T Majuta Elect Plan CK DSD City of Tucson 3/4/09 |
Final Status
| Task End Date | Reviewer's Name | Type of Review | Description |
|---|---|---|---|
| 03/10/2009 | CINDY AGUILAR | OUT TO CUSTOMER | Completed |
| 03/10/2009 | SUE REEVES | REJECT SHELF | Completed |