Microfiche records prior to 2006 have not been completely digitized and may not be available yet on PRO. If you can not find what you are looking for please submit a records request.
Permit Review Detail
Review Status: Completed
Review Details: COMMERCIAL-BLDG/FIRE/ZONING/ENG
Permit Number - T09CM00244
Review Name: COMMERCIAL-BLDG/FIRE/ZONING/ENG
Review Status: Completed
| Review Date | Reviewer's Name | Type of Review | Description | Status | Comments |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 02/03/2009 | STEVE SHIELDS | ZONING | REVIEW | Denied | DSD TRANSMITTAL FROM: Steve Shields Lead Planner PROJECT: Solon Solar Test Facility T09CM00244 Building Plan (1st Review) TRANSMITTAL DATE: February 3, 2009 1. The building plan has been reviewed by Zoning Review Section but cannot approve the plan until all zoning comments or concerns have been addressed. 2. Zoning could not verify that the building plan was in compliance with the approved site plan. Please submit two copies of the approved and stamped site plan with the next building plan submittal. 3. Zoning will re-review the building plan on the next submittal to insure compliance with the approved and stamped site plan. Additional comments may be forthcoming. If you have any questions about this transmittal, please contact me at Steve.Shields@tucsonaz.gov or (520) 837-4956 C:\planning\grading\t09cm00244.doc RESUBMITTAL OF THE FOLLOWING IS REQUIRED: |
| 02/04/2009 | ERIC NEWCOMB | BUILDING-COMMERCIAL | REVIEW | Denied | 1. SHEET 18 OF 22 (SECTION 3); GEOTECHNICAL REPORT ADDENDUM 1 (SECTION 5): THE GEOTECHNICAL REPORT INDICATES THE MINIMUM DEPTH OF DRILLED SHAFT FOUNDATIONS IS 12'. DESIGN CALCULATIONS AND SECTIONS INDICATE AN 8' MINIMUM DEPTH FOR SHAFTS. PLEASE COORDINATE. 2. SECTION 2/S301: CALL OUT MEMBER SIZES, OR MAKE REFERENCES TO APPROPRIATE SECTIONS. 3. SHEET 17 OF 22 (PLAN B); SHEET 16 OF 22: THE DRIVE SHAFT FOUNDATION IS NOT LOCATED IN THE SAME PLACE ON THESE TWO PLANS. CLARIFY. 4. SHEET 17 OF 22; PLAN B: REVISE GRID 3 TO 2.5 AT DRIVE SHAFT FOUNDATION. 5. SHEET 17 OF 22; PLAN F: REVISE GRID NUMBER. 6. SHEET 17 OF 22; PLAN C: REVISE GRID 5.3 TO 5.5, AND GRID E TO F. 7. SHEET 18 OF 22; DETAIL 6: REFERENCE DETAIL ON A SECTION CUT. 8. SHEET 18 OF 22; SECTION 2/S301 AND DETAIL 6/S301: SECTION 2 INDICATES A 1/4" CAP PLATE ON THE TUBE SECTION, WHILE DETAIL 6 DOES NOT. VERIFY. 9. SHEET 17 OF 22; PLANS C AND D: INDICATE ON PLAN ANY FRAMING REQUIRED AND SHOW SECTION CUTS OF HOW THE SOLAR UNIT CONNECTS TO THE PILES. 10. SHEET 19 OF 22; SECTION 1/S500: WHERE IS THIS SECTION CUT, AND HOW DOES IT RELATE TO THIS PROJECT? |
| 02/04/2009 | DAVE MANN | FIRE | REVIEW | Approved | |
| 02/06/2009 | RAY MAJUTA | ELECTRICAL-COMMERCIAL | REVIEW | Approved | |
| 02/10/2009 | ELIZABETH EBERBACH | ENGINEERING | REVIEW | Denied | TO: Warren Thompson, PE, STANTEC, Matthew Abate, PE SUBJECT: SOLON Solar Testing Facility Site/Grading Plan Engineering Review ADDRESSS: 6950 S Country Club Rd, north of Corona Road LOCATION: T15S, R14E, Sections 17 REVIEWER: Elizabeth Leibold, PE ACTIVITY NUMBERS: T09BU00152, T09CM00244 SUMMARY: DSD Engineering Division has reviewed the plan set and hydrology statement submittal for Site/Grading Plan review, and does not recommend approval until the following comments are addressed. SITE/GRADING COMMENTS: 1) DS Sec.11-01.4.1.C: Explain in response letter or clarify on plans project requirements listed on page 4 of hydrology statement. Specifically address the following comments: a) Label ramp material for detail 1 /2 on sheet 3. b) On sheet 20, as well as, page 1 of structural calculation pages, and page 4 of the hydrology statement, the notes state that all electrical equipment is to be placed above WSEL. (Electrical components & transformer 2-ft, and other solar equipment 1-ft above 100-yr WSEL.) Regarding the WSEL, address the following comments: i) Sheet 18 shows cassion embedment sections and 22 only shows underground conduit detail. Provide above WSEL details on sheet 18 showing basin bottom and WSEL elevations to clarify restrictions. On sheet 18 and on grading plan sheets, provide clarification of WSEL's for cross sections and further details for clarification of the locations and foundations for the piles/drilled shafts, cassion structures on the plans. ii) Notes on sheet 20 refer to underground electrical conduit; provide notation for conduit specifications for above WSEL. iii) Revise transformer pad detail on sheet 22, to show WSEL and 2-ft clearance to lowest structure elevation of the transformer. iv) On sheet 3, show cassion / piles on section detail 1/2. c) Clarify the following spillway comments: i) Clarify extents of existing fence along Country Club is to be removed. ii) Provide clarification regarding existing ground elevations and proposed fill / compaction for detail 3/3 sheet 4. d) Tucson Code Sec. 26-8(a)(2)b: Provide sample basin maintenance log sheet(s) that includes: maintenance of outlet pipe, inlet pipe, slope stabilization, sedimentation, erosion protection, and discussion regarding how the panels within basin will be maintained in such a way as to minimize or eliminate contaminants within basin area. e) Show and label existing security fence and label to be removed on sheet 3 detail 1 /2. f) Dimension top of berm for new security fence near surge tank parcel on sheet 6. 2) There is an existing channel and pipe system to the west of the basin, north of Corona Road south of existing PAAL, just west of south entrance from Corona Road. It appears to drain some overflow from the basin, this pipe appears clogged and needs maintenance. Show within grading limits if part of scope of work. 3) Grading plan shall show delineation for disturbance area / limits of grading; provide disturbance area (square feet) - delineate grading limits on a planview. 4) Provide SWPPP, with a copy of General Permit, showing on planview locations of the proposed stabilization practices / interim erosion control methods. The SWPP shall clearly delineate disturbance area / limits of grading. 5) A Floodplain Use Permit application will be needed for next submittal. 6) DS Sec.11-01.16: Add note to sheet 3, that completion documentation including letter confirming basin function, and as-built drawings (sheets 3-6) are required prior to final grading approval. If you have any questions, call me at 837-4934. Elizabeth Leibold, PE, CPM, CFM Civil Engineer Engineering Division Development Services Department City of Tucson |
Final Status
| Task End Date | Reviewer's Name | Type of Review | Description |
|---|---|---|---|
| 02/19/2009 | CPIERCE1 | OUT TO CUSTOMER | Completed |
| 02/19/2009 | SUE REEVES | REJECT SHELF | Completed |