Microfiche records prior to 2006 have not been completely digitized and may not be available yet on PRO. If you can not find what you are looking for please submit a records request.

Permit Review Detail

Permit Number: T09CM00164
Parcel: 116274770

Review Status: Completed

Review Details: RESUBMITTAL

Permit Number - T09CM00164
Review Name: RESUBMITTAL
Review Status: Completed
Review Date Reviewer's Name Type of Review Description Status Comments
03/30/2009 MICHAEL ST. PAUL ZONING REVIEW Denied CDRC TRANSMITTAL


FROM: Michael St.Paul, Planning Technician

PROJECT:
T09CM00164
3540 West Tiny Bird Court
New SFR in R-1 RCP & HDZ
2nd review

TRANSMITTAL: March 31, 2009


COMMENTS: Please attach a response letter with the next submittal, which states how all Zoning Review Section comments regarding the Land Use Code and Development Standards were addressed.


1) This site is located in the Quail Ridge Subdivision, a Residential Cluster Project (RCP) of Starr Pass. This subdivision is located it the Hillside Development Zone (HDZ) and this lot is identified as being subject to CDRC review (TP, Sheet 1, General Notes: F.4). The zoning is R-1 RCP4. Provide all the zoning information on the plot plan.

2) Properly addressed on the plot plan.

3) Provide the correct legal description at every place the lot and number is identified (Quail Ridge Lot 34). Provide this information on the plot plan.

4) Clearly dimension elevation drawings from the lowest ground level of the building to the highest point of the flat roof, which is the building's height (See LUC Illustration 2.8.1.8). The maximum building height is twenty-four (24) for residential development in the HDZ (LUC Section 2.8.1.8.A). Correctly dimension the elevation drawings and provide this information on the plot plan.

5) Clearly delineate and dimension the curb and sidewalk on the plot plan (See Tentative Plate, Typical A/5). Be certain to include the on street visitor parking space on the plot plan (See the Tentative Plat, Sheet 2 and Typical H/5). Provide the dimensions.


6) It appears that an HDZ CCRC Overlay review shall be necessary. This requirement has been determined by the engineering reviewer (see previous comments by Elizabeth Leibold) for the plot plan and grading plan (LUC Section 2.8.8.3.B). Please contact Patricia Gehlen (Patricia.Gehlen@tucsonaz.gov).

7) Please be aware that additional comments may be forthcoming relative to additional information and further submittals.
03/31/2009 DAVE WITT BUILDING-RESIDENTIAL REVIEW Denied PLAN CHECK COMMENTS - PROJECT #T09CM000164

4/07/09 3540 W. TINY BIRD CT.

PLAN REVIEW FOR THE ABOVE REFERENCED STRUCTURE HAS BEEN COMPLETED. THIS LETTER REFLECTS COMMENTS TO BE ADDRESSED. IN ORDER TO FACILITATE A SHORTER BACK CHECK TIME, WE REQUEST THAT YOU PLEASE PROVIDE REVISED PLANS AND CALCULATIONS, HIGHLIGHTING ANY CHANGES, ALONG WITH A WRITTEN RESPONSE TO EACH OF THE NOTED ITEMS INDICATING ACTION TAKEN.

SCOPE OF REVIEW:

THE SCOPE OF THIS PLAN REVIEW COVERS ARCHITECTURAL, PLUMBING, MECHANICAL, ENERGY AND ELECTRICAL CODES. ALL CODE REFERENCES ARE TO THE 2006 IRC AND STATE PLUMBING CODE. ALL FEATURES WERE CHECKED ONLY TO THE EXTENT ALLOWED BY THE SUBMITTALS PROVIDED. ALL PORTIONS OF THIS PROJECT ARE ASSUMED TO MEET OR WILL MEET OTHER DEPARTMENTAL REQUIREMENTS, CONDITIONS AND CONCERNS BEFORE PERMIT APPROVAL.

GENERAL REQUIREMENTS:

1. ALL PLANS SHALL BE LEGIBLE AND A SCALE NO SMALLER THAN ΒΌ INCH = 1-FOOT SHALL BE USED
FOR ALL FLOOR PLANS, FRAMING PLANS AND ELEVATIONS. DETAILS &CROSS SECTIONS AT A MINIMUM 3/8 INCH = 1-FOOT SCALE.

2. ALL CORRECTIONS AND REVISIONS SHALL BE MADE ON THE ORIGINAL TRACINGS AND TWO NEW SETS OF PRINTS OR (1) SEPIA & (1) BLUE LINE SHALL BE RETURNED ALONG WITH ALL REDLINE PRINTS.

3. PEN OR PENCIL CORRECTIONS ON FINAL PRINTS WILL NOT BE ACCEPTABLE. TO AVOID DELAYS ENSURE ALL CORRECTIONS HAVE BEEN MADE, ARE COMPLETE AND HAVE BEEN COORDINATED ON ALL APPLICABLE DETAILS AND NOTES.


FLOOR PLANS:

1. PLEASE DIMENSION THE SHOWER IN BATH #2.

SECTIONS - DETAILS - MISC. NOTES:

1. PROVIDE A DETAIL OF A SCUPPER. 6"X 6".

PLUMBING PLANS:

1. PLEASE CHECK THE WATER DISTRIBUTION SIZE AND THE GAS SIZES. I'VE PUT THE SIZES I CAME UP WITH ON THE PLUMBING PLAN.

ELECTRICAL PLANS:

1. PLEASE PROVIDE THE OUTDOOR LIGHTING CODE CALCULATIONS AND LIGHT FIXTURE CUT SHEETS.

2. PLEASE CHECK THE ELECTRICAL LOAD CALCULATIONS. YOU FORGOT TO ADD THE 10,000 WATTS BACK IN AFTER YOU TOOK THE 49% REDUCTION.





IF YOU HAVE ANY QUESTIONS, PLEASE CONTACT YOUR ASSIGNED PLANS EXAMINER:
DAVE WITT @ 837-4910
04/03/2009 DAVE MANN FIRE REVIEW Approv-Cond Fire sprinklers are required due to flow from hydrant.
04/13/2009 ELIZABETH LEIBOLD ENGINEERING REVIEW Approved TO: Donald Clemons
SUBJECT: Quail Ridge Lot 34 Engineering SFR Grading Review Resubmittal
ADDRESS: 3540 W Tiny Bird Ct
LOCATION: Quail Ridge lot 34 T14S R13E Section 17, Ward 1
REVIEWER: Elizabeth Leibold
ACTIVITY NUMBERS: T09CM00164, T09BU00098

SUMMARY: The SFR site plan and grading plan submittal was received and reviewed. Engineering recommends approval of the site and grading plans with conditions to the grading permit to be addressed prior to final grading approval by DSD Engineering Inspectors.

GRADING PERMIT CONDITIONS:
The following 10 conditions apply to grading permit T09BU00098:
1) CALL FOR PRE-CONSTRUCTION MEETING. FOR A DSD ENGINEERING INSPECTION, CALL IVR (740-6970), OR SCHEDULE WITH A CUSTOMER SERVICE REPRESENTATIVE AT THE DEVELOPMENT SERVICES DEPARTMENT, OR CONTACT DSD ENGINEERING AT 791-5550 EXTENSION 2101, OR SCHEDULE INSPECTIONS ONLINE AT: HTTP://WWW.CI.TUCSON.AZ.US/DSD/ONLINE_SERVICES/ONLINE_PERMITS/ONLINE_PERMITS.HTML
2) THERE SHALL BE NO DISTURBANCE OUTSIDE OF THE DISTURBANCE/GRADING LIMITS.
3) A GEOTECHNICAL ENGINEERING FIELD REPORT MUST BE SUBMITTED TO DSD ENGINEERING TO ADDRESS FIELD OBSERVATIONS AND ACCPETANCE OF CUT SLOPES.
4) DRIVEWAY SHALL BE CONSTRUCTED TO PROVIDE POSITIVE FLOW AWAY FROM GARAGE.
5) WALL OPENINGS SHALL BE PROVIDED FOR SURFACE DRAIANGE FROM YARD OR PATIO AREAS. ANY OUTLET AREAS WILL NEED SPLASH PADS OR OTHER EROSION PROTECTION.
6) SEPARATE BUILDING PERMITS ARE REQUIRED FOR ALL WALLS.
7) NO MATERIALS AND / OR CONSTRUCTION EQUIPMENT SHALL BE STOCKPILED OR PARKED OUTSIDE OF GRADING LIMITS AT ANY TIME.
8) IT IS RECOMMENDED THAT SWALE BE CONSTRUCTED BELOW GRADE TO PREVENT EROSION OUTSIDE OF ANY POTENTIAL REDIRECTED RUNOFF. POSITIVE DRAINAGE FROM BUILDING IS REQUIRED.
9) HILLSIDE DEVELOPMENT ACS WAS CALCULATED TO BE 13.95 BY ENGINEERING REVIEW. HDZ COMPLIANCE PER 9-04.3 IS REQUIRED.
10) AS-BUILT PLANS ARE REQUIRED PRIOR TO FINAL GRADING APPROVAL.

If you have questions, call me at 837-4934.

Elizabeth Leibold, PE
Civil Engineer
Engineering Division
Development Services Department

Final Status

Task End Date Reviewer's Name Type of Review Description
04/15/2009 CINDY AGUILAR OUT TO CUSTOMER Completed
04/15/2009 CINDY AGUILAR REJECT SHELF Completed