Permit Review Detail
Review Status: Completed
Review Details: COMMERCIAL NEW
Permit Number - T09CM00062
Review Name: COMMERCIAL NEW
Review Status: Completed
| Review Date | Reviewer's Name | Type of Review | Description | Status | Comments |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 06/18/2009 | MARTIN BROWN | FIRE | REVIEW | Approved | Cover sheet states fire sprinklers existing (?) Fire department attempting to verify if they are there or not. |
| 06/18/2009 | RONALD BROWN | ZONING HC SITE | REVIEW | Denied | 22 JUNE 2009 T09CM00062/OTT FAMILY YMCA GYMNASIUM ADDITION AND RENOVATION REVIEWED BY RON BROWN BUILDING AND ACCESSIBLE REVIEW 2006 IBC and ADAAG DENIED: SEE COMMENTS BELOW I. GENERAL: A. Please provide a code analysis review and summary as to square footage for entire building complex, new and existing. B. If a fire sprinkler system is to be provided, where is the service connection, extension of existing or new water main and meter? C. Is the existing facility already sprinklered and where is the water service entrance? D. Please show code analysis of allowable square footage increase. E. Please show a breakdown of all occupancy classifications and their square footage sizes for the new and existing building. F. Please show quantity of toilet fixtures required as to new occupancy load calculations and how many are provided G. All deferred submittals must have a letter of statement and summary sent to the building official, Mr. Ernie Duarte. H. Please provide all necessary special inspection forms for all required special inspections for review and approval. I. Please provide code analysis for number required exits and how many are provided. J. Please show a budgetary cost analysis of project and the 20% accessibility expenditure. K. Is there a Fire Alarm system to be provided? If so, please insure compliance with ADAAG, Section 4.1.2 (14) and 428. II. SHEET G-003: A. Provide a letter to the building official, Mr. Ernie Duarte outlining all deferred Submittals. There are additional fees for deferred submittals. III. SHEET A-104: A. Electric water cooler shown at the elevator does not comply with Section 4.1.3 (10)(a) B. There is insufficient detail and dimensions for the new stair. Please provide a plan(s) blowup showing all necessary dimensions, riser and tread sizes, landing sizes and configuration of all handrails. 1. At all stair section detail nos. D2, D3 and D4/A-302 please provide all critical vertical dimensions, riser and tread sizes, landing sizes, finish floor levels to landing dimensions and configuration of all handrails complying with section 4.9 and figure 19. C. Door no. 116-2 is not in compliance with Section 4.13, figure 25 (a). D. Please show all required fire rated partitions and reference approved UL rated assemblies, reference 2006 IBC, Section 707.4 and 3006.4. E. Please provide plan blow-up of rooms 117 and 104 showing all critical accessibility dimensions, accessories and clearances. F. IV. SHEET A-105: A. Ditto comments IIIB and IID above. V. SHEET A-205: A. At detail B02/A-205 provide an accessible section of counter to comply with section 7.2: VI. SHEET A-302: A. Ditto comment note III.B.1 above. VII. SHEET A-501: A. Need to provide some sort of specification for accessible signage. VIII. SHEET A-601: A. Door 131-1 needs to be rated. B. Please provide copy of ANSI Hardware groups as shown on hardware schedule. IX. SHEET AX-101: A. Electric water cooler shown at the elevator does not comply with Section 4.1.3 (10)(a) B. There is insufficient detail and dimensions for the new stair. Please provide a plan(s) blowup showing all necessary dimensions, riser and tread sizes, landing sizes and Please provide critical accessibility dimension requirements, accessories and clearances. X. . STRUCTURAL REVIEW COMMENTS: A. SHEET S-101; DETAIL 103; SECTION 4/S-103: THE FOOTING SIZE DIFFERS IN THESE TWO SECTIONS, ALTHOUGH BOTH ARE CUT ON THE SAME WALL. CLARIFY. B. SHEET S-102; FLOOR FRAMING PLAN LEVEL 2: KEY NOTE 5 IS NOT LISTED WITH THE NOTES. VERIFY. C. SHEET S-501; DETAIL 110: INDICATE NOTES 1 AND 2 ON THE DETAIL. D. SHEET S-505; DETAIL 228: IS THE TUBE COLUMN TO BE WELDED TO THE C8? CLARIFY. E. SHEET S-505; DETAIL 227: SHOW THE CONFIGURATION OF HOW THE TUBE COLUMN IS POSITIONED ON THE BASE PLATE, AND ANCHOR BOLT LOCATIONS. IS THERE ENOUGH CLEARANCE BETWEEN THE NEW ANCHOR BOLTS AND THE EXISTING CONCRETE WALL? VERIFY. F. PROVIDE WRITTEN RESPONSES TO ALL PLAN CHECK COMMENTS. END OF REVIEW |
| 06/18/2009 | RONALD BROWN | ADA | REVIEW | Passed | NOT A COT OWNED/OPERATED PROPERTY |
| 06/22/2009 | STEVE SHIELDS | ZONING | REVIEW | Approved | DSD TRANSMITTAL FROM: Steve Shields Lead Planner PROJECT: OTT Family YMCA - GYMNASIUM ADDITION T09CM00062 Building Plan (1st Review) TRANSMITTAL DATE: June 22, 2009 1. The building plan has been reviewed by Zoning Review Section but cannot approve the plan until all zoning comments or concerns have been addressed. 2. Zoning could not verify that the building plan was in compliance with the approved site plan.. Please submit two copies of the approved and stamped site plan with the next building plan submittal. 3. Zoning will re-review the building plan on the next submittal to insure compliance with the approved and stamped site plan. Additional comments may be forthcoming. If you have any questions about this transmittal, please contact me at Steve.Shields@tucsonaz.gov or (520) 837-4956 C:\planning\grading\t09cm00062.doc RESUBMITTAL OF THE FOLLOWING IS REQUIRED: |
| 06/22/2009 | ERIC NEWCOMB | BUILDING-COMMERCIAL | REVIEW | Denied | 1. SEE H/C COMMENTS. |
| 06/22/2009 | PAUL MACHADO | ENGINEERING | REVIEW | Approved | To: Klimatic Architecture DATE: June 22, 2009 6375 E. Tanque Verde Rd. Tucson, Arizona 857115 Subject:Gym/Add. & Remodel of YMCA, 401 S. Prudence Rd. Site plan T09CM00062 (Third Review) T14S, R15E, Section 17 RESUBMITTAL REQUIRED: Site Plan. The Site Plan (SP) cannot be approved as submitted. Please address the following review comments prior to the next submittal. Site Plan: 1. Please include a response letter to the comments along with the corrected copies of the SP. 2. Only a note on the architectural site plan was added to the plan that is was previously approved. No reference or information was shown that the "approved-cond." status was met. 3. Provide additional grades to indicate a cross-slope of less than 4% on the curve in the exit drive. Per previous comment. 4. Show Site plan number (T09CM00062 & T09BU00806) on all sheets per D.S. 2-02.2.1.29. If you have any questions, I can be reached at 837-4932 or Paul.Machado@tucsonaz.gov Paul P. Machado Senior Engineering Associate City of Tucson/Development Services Department 201 N. Stone Avenue P.O. Box 27210 Tucson, Arizona 85726-7210 (520) 837-4932 office (520) 879-8010 fax C:/401 S. Prudence Rd. SITE |
| 06/26/2009 | RAY MAJUTA | ELECTRICAL-COMMERCIAL | REVIEW | Denied | Project:T09CM00062 401 N Prudence Rd Ymca Remodel The Electrical Plans have been denied for the following' 1. Sheet E 104, No circuit on power plan for L2-21, which is listed on panel. 2. Sheet E 104, circuit L-2A 32 and 34 , Panel schedule states these are in the Gym, not on power plan. 3. Some circuits in panel schedules do no indicate designation , please fill these in. 4. Sheet E 105, ACCU 1 shows going to Pnl L 2A -36, L2A-36 has no load, mixed with circuit-38 ? 5. Sheet E L2-29, power plan shows in room 117, in the panel schedule it is shown in rm 114. 6. Sheet L2-31 in power plan is in room 128, on panel schedule is is shown as Rm 126. 7. Sheet E L2 -27 on power plan shown in Rm 115, in panel schedule it is in Rm 112. 8. Sheet E 501, L2-16 shown in elevator Rm is shown on Panel Schedule to feed Rm118. 9. Sheet E 601 for following, Need a 3/0 grd in feeds from new SES feed to Existing SES, Need 1/0 grd from new SES feed to new 800 SES. Missing neutral from 800 SES to 200 Amp feed for Panel L2. Need grd's in feed to AC's Panelfeeds to L2A and L2B missing neutrals Two AC's marked #6. Ray T Majuya Elect Plan Ck DSD City of Tucson 6/29/09 Ray.Majuta@tucsonaz.gov |
| 06/30/2009 | ROBERT SHERRY | PLUMBING-COMMERCIAL | REVIEW | Denied | 1. Provide a design for the revised natural; gas distribution piping, including all of the connected loads, developed lengths, and pipe sizes. Reference: Section 103.2.3, UPC 2006. 2. Show how the temperature of the hot water supply to the public lavatories is controlled. Reference: Section 413.1, UPC 2006 and Section 504.3, IECC 2006. 3. Provide water pressure and water pipe sizing calculations. Reference: Section 610.1, UPC 2006. 4. Provide a design and details for the drains and overflows for the new roof sections. Reference: Section 1106.0, UPC 2006. 5. Provide specifications for the equipment labeled SWB1 and SWB2 and show how they relate to the current activity. 6. Complete the waste and vent isometrics on sheet P-502 (i.e. show the pipe sizes). Reference: Section 103.2.3, UPC 2006. 7. Provide information to show that the shower control valves conform to the requirements of ASSE 1016. Reference: Section 418.0, UPC 2006. |
| 06/30/2009 | ROBERT SHERRY | MECHANICAL-COMMERCIAL | REVIEW | Denied | 1. Provide energy code compliance calculations for the addition (envelope and mechanical). Provide sufficient detail on the drawings to evaluate the energy compliance of the building envelope. The information shall, as a minimum, include U-factors of the envelope systems and fenestration components, along with the R-values of the insulation. Reference: Sections 101.4 and 104.2, International Energy Conservation Code 2006. 2. Provide calculations demonstrating adequate ventilation. Reference: Section 403.1, IMC 2006. 3. Provide the size of the supply air duct shown in room 201. Reference: Section 106.3.2, IMC 2006. |
| 06/30/2009 | ROBERT SHERRY | WATER | REVIEW | Denied | Provide the size of the existing water meter and the total connected water demand that will result from the addition of this activity. Reference: Sections 610.1 and 610.2, UPC 2006. |
| 07/01/2009 | BETH GRANT | COMMERCIAL IMPACT FEE | COMMERCIAL IMPACT FEE PROCESSING | Completed | IMPACT FEES APPLY- EAST DISTRICT, 14000 SQ FOOT $88,446.00 |
| 07/06/2009 | GERRY KOZIOL | WWM | REVIEW | Approved |
Final Status
| Task End Date | Reviewer's Name | Type of Review | Description |
|---|---|---|---|
| 07/14/2009 | DELMA ROBEY | OUT TO CUSTOMER | Completed |
| 07/14/2009 | SUE REEVES | REJECT SHELF | Completed |