Microfiche records prior to 2006 have not been completely digitized and may not be available yet on PRO. If you cannot find what you are looking for please submit a records request.

Permit Number: T09CM00062
Parcel: 13414011A

Review Status: Completed

Review Details: RESUBMITTAL - SITE ALL

Permit Number - T09CM00062
Review Name: RESUBMITTAL - SITE ALL
Review Status: Completed
Review Date Reviewer's Name Type of Review Description Status Comments
04/06/2009 STEVE SHIELDS ZONING REVIEW Denied DSD TRANSMITTAL

FROM: Steve Shields
Lead Planner

PROJECT: OTT Family YMCA - GYMNASIUM ADDITION
T09CM00062
Site Plan (2nd Review)

TRANSMITTAL DATE: April 7, 2009

COMMENTS: Please resubmit revised drawings and a response letter, which states how all Zoning Review Section comments regarding the Land Use Code and Development Standards were addressed.

1. This site plan was reviewed for compliance with the City of Tucson Development Standards (D.S.) and Land Use Code (LUC) for full code compliance for the effected areas.

2. D.S. 2-02.2.1.A.8 On detail "L" the A- Parking angle dimension is shown incorrectly, refer to LUC Section 3.3.7.2. The C - Space depth and E Curb length dimensions were not provided.

3. D.S. 2-02.2.1.A.9 Zoning acknowledges bicycle parking details E & F on sheet C-501. These details do not provide a fully dimensioned layout, refer to D.S. 2-095.1.A & B and D.S. 2-095.2.

4. D.S. 2-02.2.2.A.3 Provide the allowed lot coverage on the plan.

5. The area directly adjacent to the east side of the proposed expansion is shown as existing pavement on sheet C-101 and is shown as a landscaped area on sheets AS-102 and AS-105, please clarify what this area will be.

6. Once the above comments have been addressed I am willing to provide an over the counter review. Please call or email to schedule an appointment.

If you have any questions about this transmittal, please contact me at Steve.Shields@tucsonaz.gov or (520) 837-4956.

C:\planning\site\t09cm0062-2nd

RESUBMITTAL OF THE FOLLOWING IS REQUIRED: Revised site plan and additional requested documents.
04/08/2009 PETER MCLAUGHLIN LANDSCAPE REVIEW Approv-Cond Any changes made to the site plan based on other reviewer's comments must also be reflected on the landscape plan.
04/13/2009 RONALD BROWN ZONING HC SITE REVIEW Denied Susan: You have no spokes in your bicycle wheels.

SHEET C101:
1. The two curb ramps reference to note 14 are not the same ramps as shown on that detail and on the architectural sheet AS-103. The civil ramps are 6' long whereas the detail and architectural ramps are 8' long. 8' long ramps at 1:12 slope, require handrails.
a. Change note 14 to read "access per ICC/ANSI, Section 406". COT 207 is for public right of way construction only and ADA is for COT and/or Federally owned and operaterated properties..
b. Generic details are not acceptable. Please provide an accurate detail as shown on the site plan and coordinate the actual length per the elevation shown on the civil drawings, 6" = 6' in length. Please show all dimensions and grade elevations required to comply with Section 406.
2. What happen to concrete walk accessible route connection to proposed building exit at the West side? This connection is needed.
SHEET C-102
3. Please provide spot grades for serpintine ramp, stairs to main entrance and at all marked crossing curb ramps.
SHEET C-501
4. Detail Nos. L and M: Show location of signs.
5. Detail Nos. L and D: provide complete dimensions
6. Detrail L, Curb Ramp with Flared Sides:
a. Delete reference to ADA, use ICC/ANSI 117.1
b. Generic details are not aceptable, probviode plan of exac t site plan designed element, to scale. Show all dimensions and spot grades required to comply with Section 406. Flared side to be a min slope of 1:10.
7. Detail G: Fine is now $532.00.
SHEET AS-103:
8. Curb ramps at both marked crossings appear to be too long for height of curb. Reference Civil drawings and provide spot grades for most easterly ramp on Civil drawing.
9. Provide additional dimernsions as required to determine compliance with code.
10. provide large scale details of all different types of ramps. Generic ramp details not acceptable.
11. Show signage location.

END OF REVIEW
04/28/2009 ROBERT SHERRY PLUMBING-COMMERCIAL REVIEW Approved

Final Status

Task End Date Reviewer's Name Type of Review Description
05/07/2009 BETH GRANT OUT TO CUSTOMER Completed
05/07/2009 SUE REEVES REJECT SHELF Completed