Microfiche records prior to 2006 have not been completely digitized and may not be available yet on PRO. If you can not find what you are looking for please submit a records request.
Permit Review Detail
Review Status: Completed
Review Details: RESUBMITTAL - GRADING ALL
Permit Number - T09BU01907
Review Name: RESUBMITTAL - GRADING ALL
Review Status: Completed
Review Date | Reviewer's Name | Type of Review | Description | Status | Comments |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
03/16/2010 | ANDREW CONNOR | NPPO | REVIEW | Denied | The grading plan has been reviewed by the Landscape / NPPO Section but cannot approve the plan until all Engineering, comments, concerns, and appropriate revisions have been addressed. |
03/17/2010 | ANDREW CONNOR | ZONING | REVIEW | Denied | The grading plan has been reviewed by the Zoning Section but cannot approve the plan until all Engineering, comments, concerns, and appropriate revisions have been addressed. |
03/26/2010 | JASON GREEN | ENGINEERING | REVIEW | Denied | DATE: March 30, 2010 SUBJECT: 8578 E Broadway Blvd Site and Grading Plan- 2nd Engineering Review TO: MPE Attn: Lisa Bowers LOCATION: T14S R15E Sec16 Ward 2 REVIEWERS: Jason Green, CFM ACTIVITY: T09CM03408 (Site Plan), T09BU01907 (Grading Plan) SUMMARY: Engineering Division of Planning and Development Services Department has received and reviewed the revised site plan (T09CM03408), Grading Plan (T09BU01907), Drainage Statement (Stanley Engineering & Drainage, Inc., 22DEC09), and Geotechnical Engineering Report (Terracon, 11NOV09) for the above referenced property. Engineering Division does not recommend approval of the plan sets at this time. The following items need to be addressed: SITE PLAN COMMENTS: 1) Complied. 2) Complied. 3) Complied. 4) Acknowledged. 5) Complied. 6) Complied. 7) Complied. 8) Complied. 9) The seal on the Site Plan must be signed and dated by the Registered Architect of Record that prepared the plan set. None of the signed seals had the date of signature. GRADING PLAN COMMENTS: 10) Restated: Provide a copy of the stamped approved site plan (T09CM03408). The grading plan can not be approved until verification that all details, locations, dimensions, and plan profiles match the approved site plan. Verify all information associated with the site plan is shown on the grading plan which will be used as the construction document. 11) Complied. 12) Complied. 13) Complied. 14) Complied. 15) Complied. 16) Complied. 17) Complied. 18) Complied. 19) Complied. 20) Complied. 21) Complied. 22) Complied. 23) Complied. 24) Complied. 25) Complied. GENERAL COMMENTS: Please provide a signed and dated site plan from the Architect of Record and the proposed grading plan that addresses the comments provided above. Include a comprehensive response letter addressing in detail responses to all of the above comments. For questions or to schedule an appointment I can be reached at 837-4929. Jason Green, CFM Senior Engineer Associate Engineering Division COT Planning & Development Services |
Final Status
Task End Date | Reviewer's Name | Type of Review | Description |
---|---|---|---|
04/07/2010 | DELMA ROBEY | OUT TO CUSTOMER | Completed |
04/07/2010 | SUE REEVES | REJECT SHELF | Completed |