Microfiche records prior to 2006 have not been completely digitized and may not be available yet on PRO. If you can not find what you are looking for please submit a records request.
Permit Review Detail
Review Status: Completed
Review Details: GRADING
Permit Number - T09BU01907
Review Name: GRADING
Review Status: Completed
| Review Date | Reviewer's Name | Type of Review | Description | Status | Comments |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 01/04/2010 | DAVID RIVERA | ZONING | REVIEW | Denied | DSD TRANSMITTAL FROM: David Rivera Principal Planner PROJECT: T09BU01907 Taco Bell 8578 E Broadway Blvd. Grading Plan TRANSMITTAL DATE: January 4, 2010 COMMENTS: Please resubmit revised drawings along with redlines and a response letter, which states how all Zoning Review Section comments were addressed. 1. The site plan has been submitted for review but has not been approved. As of this review date the site plan has not been reviewed by any of the plans reviewers. 2. The sidewalk connection to the dumpster and connection from the dumpster do not appear to be in a location that will be approved by the Zoning or ADA reviewers and will not comply with DS 2-08. See the zoning and ADA review comments related to this item. All sidewalks adjacent to a PAAL must be physically separated. Based on further comments on the site plan by the zoning reviewer additional comments may be forthcoming on the next grading review related to this item. 3. Demonstrate that maneuverability into the loading zone meets the minimum turning radius needed to access space. The radius to be used to demonstrate compliance should be based 50 foot outside and 35 foot inside radius. See zoning and engineering comments on the site plan review for more info. 4. Demonstrate the number of stacking spaces from the pick up window. A minimum of six spaces is required for a single drive-through lane. This may assist in possibly relocation of the sidewalk. See possible option in redline attached to sheet 2. If you have any questions about this transmittal, please call David Rivera, (520) 791-5608. C:\DSD\T09BU01907.doc RESUBMITTAL OF THE FOLLOWING IS REQUIRED: Revised grading plan |
| 01/05/2010 | JASON GREEN | ENGINEERING | REVIEW | Denied | DATE: January 12, 2010 SUBJECT: 8578 E Broadway Blvd Site and Grading Plan- Engineering Review TO: MPE Attn: Lisa Bowers LOCATION: T14S R15E Sec16 Ward 2 REVIEWERS: Jason Green, CFM ACTIVITY: T09CM03408 (Site Plan), T09BU01907 (Grading Plan) SUMMARY: Engineering Division of Planning and Development Services Department has received and reviewed the site plan (T09CM03408), Grading Plan (T09BU01907), Drainage Statement (Stanley Engineering & Drainage, Inc., 22DEC09), and Geotechnical Engineering Report (Terracon, 11NOV09) for the above referenced property. Engineering Division does not recommend approval of the plan sets at this time. The following items need to be addressed: SITE PLAN COMMENTS: 1) DS Sec.2-02.2.1.A.8: Revise the site plan to label the minimum 24-foot PAAL dimension in plan view for the access point from the main PAAL. Verify height restrictions for the existing sign as shown by Keynote # 32. 2) DS Sec.2-02.2.1.A.8: Clarify on the site plan any parking spaces that will required wheel stops to prevent vehicles from encroaching into any pedestrian access points or landscape areas. If the parking spaces are proposed at 18-feet then wheel stops may be required to allow for the required 2.5 foot overhang at these areas. Or provide a dimension to show that the vehicles do not overhang into these areas. 3) DS Sec.2-02.2.1.A.12: Revise the site plan to label the required 5-foot pedestrian access width for the sidewalk adjacent to the refuse container and PAAL. Per DS Sec.3-05.2.2.B.1 a pedestrian circulation must provide a clear 4-foot minimum width unless adjacent to a PAAL which would require a 5-foot width. The sidewalk must be raised or provide a barrier between pedestrian circulation and vehicular use area. 4) DS Sec.2-02.2.1.A.12: Refer to comments from Ron Brown, RA Structural Plans Examiner for all ADA and handicap requirements that may apply to this project. 5) DS Sec.2-02.2.1.A.16: Provide the Improvement Plan reference number for all existing drainage infrastructure adjacent to the site; i.e. catch basins, storm drains, etc. All existing drainage improvements that are shown on the site plan must have the referenced improvement plan for site verification. 6) DS Sec.2-01.2.1.A.19: Revise the site plan to label and dimension the existing right-of-way and future Major Streets and Routes right-of-way for Broadway Blvd. 7) DS Sec.2-02.2.1.A.21: Provide dimensions from the street monument lines to the existing curb, sidewalk, driveways and utility lines. Clearly label all improvements within the right-of-way. 8) Revise the site plan to remove the outline for the old building to be demolished (Keynote #38). The building is shown on the demolition plan therefore does not need to be shown on the proposed site plan. 9) Be advised that further comments may be forth coming on resubmittal of the site plan. GRADING PLAN COMMENTS: 10) Provide a copy of the stamped approved site plan (T09CM03408). The grading plan can not be approved until verification that all details, locations, dimensions, and plan profiles match the approved site plan. Verify all information associated with the site plan is shown on the grading plan which will be used as the construction document. 11) Revise the grading plan to clearly delineate the proposed grading limits both onsite and offsite for all improvements. Provide a notarized signed agreement from all adjacent property owners for all work that is proposed offsite. (i.e. parking stalls located along the east side). 12) Provide the basis of bearing (General Note #1) used to establish dimensions and bearings of property lines and property corners. The basis of bearing should be established from 2 found, physically monumented points described and shown on the site plan. 13) Provide the basis of elevation (General Note #2) used to establish the existing and proposed grades as shown on the civil sheets. 14) Revise the sheet index reference on the grading plan to correctly show all 3 sheets and the information provided on each one. 15) Revise the grading plan to provide the grading plan activity number assigned to this project (T09BU01907) as depicted by "T09BU___." 16) Revise the grading plan to provide the cut and fill quantities under the Earthwork Quantities header. 17) Revise all General Notes on the grading plan sheet to correctly reference City of Tucson "Planning and Development Services" everywhere it states City of Tucson "Development Services." All future submittals should reference the new COT name for this organization. 18) Revise the General Note Section to remove notes 25, 26, and 27. All 3 notes are repeats from previous notes. 19) Revise the grading plan to label the required 5-foot pedestrian access width for the sidewalk adjacent to the refuse container and PAAL. Per DS Sec.3-05.2.2.B.1 a pedestrian circulation must provide a clear 4-foot minimum width unless adjacent to a PAAL which would require a 5-foot width. The sidewalk must be raised or provide a barrier between pedestrian circulation and vehicular use area 20) Provide the Improvement Plan reference number for the existing catch basins and storm drains located along Broadway Blvd and shown within plan view. 21) Revise the grading plan sheets to include the reference to the Geotechnical Report required for this project. Provide the date, job number, engineer who prepared the report, etc. 22) Revise the grading plan and/or Keynotes # 37 and 47 to provide a detail for construction for the proposed 1-foot and 2-foot curb openings. Clearly show how the curb openings are to be constructed. 23) Provide a detail for the proposed sidewalk construction (Keynote #10). The detail must at a minimum meet all requirements within Standard Detail for Public Improvement #200. 24) Revise the grading plan and detail for the proposed refuse container that meets the minimum requirements within DS Sec.6-01. Refer to Figure 3 and DS Sec.6-01.4.2 for specifications and requirements on access, placement of containers, and bin enclosure construction. Refer to Environmental Services for further clarity on refuse requirements. 25) Please ensure that the grading plan is consistent with the site plan and Drainage Report. Grading standards may be accessed at: http://www.ci.tucson.az.us/dsd/DevStandsTOC.pdf. GENERAL COMMENTS: Please provide a revised site plan and grading plan that addresses the comments provided above. Include a comprehensive response letter addressing in detail responses to all of the above comments. Enclose "redlines" with the resubmittal package. Further comments may be generated upon resubmittal of the site plan and grading plan review. For questions or to schedule an appointment I can be reached at 837-4929. Jason Green, CFM Senior Engineer Associate Engineering Division COT Planning & Development Services |
| 01/13/2010 | ANDREW CONNOR | NPPO | REVIEW | Denied | The grading plan has been reviewed by the Landscape / NPPO Section but cannot approve the plan until all Engineering, comments, concerns, and appropriate revisions have been addressed. |
Final Status
| Task End Date | Reviewer's Name | Type of Review | Description |
|---|---|---|---|
| 02/05/2010 | CPIERCE1 | OUT TO CUSTOMER | Completed |
| 02/05/2010 | SUE REEVES | REJECT SHELF | Completed |