Microfiche records prior to 2006 have not been completely digitized and may not be available yet on PRO. If you can not find what you are looking for please submit a records request.
Permit Review Detail
Review Status: Completed
Review Details: GRADING
Permit Number - T09BU01756
Review Name: GRADING
Review Status: Completed
| Review Date | Reviewer's Name | Type of Review | Description | Status | Comments |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 12/08/2009 | JASON GREEN | ENGINEERING | REVIEW | Denied | DATE: December 9, 2009 SUBJECT: 5379 S Calle Santa Cruz- Engineering Review TO: MPE Attn: Lisa Bowers LOCATION: T15S R13E Sec02 Ward 1 REVIEWERS: Jason Green, CFM ACTIVITY: T09CM03091 (Building Plan), T09BU01757 (Building Plan) and T09BU01756 (Grading Plan) SUMMARY: Engineering Division of the Planning and Development Services Department has received and reviewed the proposed Discount Tire Store building plan (T09CM03091), TI Storage Racks building plan (T09BU01757), grading plan (T09BU01756), and Geotechnical Evaluation (MACTEC Engineering and Consulting, Inc., 19FEB09) for the above referenced property. Engineering Division does not recommend approval of the building plans or grading plan at this time. The following items need to be addressed: BUILDING PLAN COMMENTS (New Discount Tire Store and TI Storage Racks): 1) DS Sec.2-02.2.1.A.8: Revise Keynote #3 on Sheet A2.0 to provide specific details for the proposed "black" concrete within the vehicular use area. Or provide said details on the grading plan sheets for construction purposes. Verify that thickness, psi, etc for construction purposes are called out. 2) DS Sec.2-02.2.1.A.8: Revise Detail 7/A2.1 to dimension all aspects of the proposed accessible parking requirements. Length, width, 2.5 foot overhang, curbing, etc. 3) DS Sec.2-02.2.1.A.12: Refer to comments from Ron Brown, RA Structural Plans Examiner for all onsite handicap and ANSI Standard requirements that apply to this project. 4) DS Sec.2-02.2.1.A.20: Verify that all existing easements that are shown on the plan set that are in conflict with the building pad location have been abandoned. Specifically the Public Utility Easement as shown on the Utility Sheet, C1.04 and on the Architectural Building Plan sheets. All easements must be abandoned prior to building plan approval. If the easements have been previously abandoned provide the documentation with Docket and Page for verification. 5) DS Sec.2-02.2.1.A.32: Revise the plan set to label and dimension all requirements for the proposed refuse enclosure. Verify that all details meet the minimum requirements within DS Sec.6-01, Figure 3. Provide a detail on the grading plan sheets for construction purposes. 6) Clarify Keynote #42 on Sheet A1.0. The paragraph seems to have a typo, "….OTH?#?.?!?2?(????er…", revise. 7) Be advised that further comments may be forth coming on resubmittal of the building plans. GRADING PLAN: 8) Revise the Title on the Cover Sheet of the Plan set to read "Discount Tire Company: Grading, Paving and Building Plans." Since the grading plan sheets have been submitted with the building plan package the Cover Sheet should represent all plans that are included. 9) Provide the cut and fill quantities on the grading plan sheets under the General Note Section and/or the Site Information Section for clarity purposes. The quantities provided on Sheet 1.02 were written in by hand, verify. 10) Revise Sheet C1.01 of the grading plan to include the telephone contact information for the Developer under the Project Information Section. 11) Verify that all existing easements that are shown on the plan set in conflict with the building pad location have been abandoned. Specifically the Public Utility Easement as shown on the Utility Sheet, C1.04 and on the Architectural Building Plan sheets. All easements must be abandoned prior to building plan approval. 12) Revise the grading plan sheets and/or details to provide site specific construction details for the proposed project. All construction details (i.e. refuse enclosures, vehicular use area, curbing, parking spaces, etc) should be on the civil sheets which act as the construction document. If the applicant chooses to use the Architectural Sheets for construction purposes then 1) verify that all details provided meet the minimum requirements within the development standards and Standard Details for Public Improvement and 2) verify that the keynotes and details don't refer back to the civil drawings which in turn refer to the Architect drawings. 13) Revise Sheet C1.02 of the grading plan to label and keynote the proposed/existing concrete bollards at the end of the PAAL located on the east side of the site. 14) Clarify the handicap access ramps and vertical curbing labeled at the proposed handicap parking spaces on Sheet C1.02. The ramps proposed imply that the curbing in front of the parking spaces is depressed and/or a concrete header. However per Keynote #1 it is shown as vertical curbing, clarify. 15) Revise all Construction Notes on Sheet C1.02 of the grading plan that reference the Architectural Plan sheets. Either provide a separate detail for construction purposes on the civil sheets (highly recommended) or at a minimum clearly reference the exact Architectural Sheet and/or detail where the improvement may be located for construction purposes. 16) Provide a General Note on the grading plan sheets to include the reference to the Geotechnical Evaluation prepared for this project. Provide the date, job number, engineer who prepared the report, etc. 17) DS Sec.11-01: Provide a General Note on the grading plan sheets specifying conformance with City of Tucson Development Standard 11-01.0 (excavation and grading requirements). 18) Provide a General Note on the grading plan sheets stating; "All proposed fencing and walls will require a separate permit for review and approval by all necessary Planning and Development Services Departments." 19) Provide a General Note on Sheet C1.01 to state; "All landscaping to be depressed minimum 6-inches for stormwater harvesting. Refer to the Water Harvesting Guidance Manual Ordinance # 10210 dated October 25 for further recommendations for stormwater harvesting." 20) Provide a General Note on Sheet C1.01 to state; "Call for a Pre-construction meeting prior to start of earthwork. To schedule a PDSD Pre-construction meeting, SWPPP inspection or general Engineering Inspections, call IVR (740-6970), or schedule with a Customer Service Representative at the Planning and Development Services Department, or contact PDSD Engineering at 791-5550 extension 2101, or schedule inspections online at: http://www.ci.tucson.az.us/dsd/Online_Services/Online_Permits/online_permits.html 21) Please ensure that the grading plan is consistent with the Architectural site plan sheets. Grading standards may be accessed at: http://www.ci.tucson.az.us/dsd/DevStandsTOC.pdf. GENERAL COMMENTS: Please provide revised building plans and grading plan sheets that address the comments provided above. Include a comprehensive response letter addressing in detail responses to all of the above comments. Enclose "redlines" with the resubmittal package. Further comments may be generated upon resubmittal of the building plan and grading plan review. For questions, or to schedule an appointment, I can be reached at 837-4929. Jason Green, CFM Senior Engineer Associate, Engineering Division COT Planning & Development Services Department |
| 12/14/2009 | DAVID RIVERA | ZONING | REVIEW | Denied | PDSD TRANSMITTAL FROM: David Rivera Principal Planner PROJECT: T09BU01757 5379 S. Calle Santa Cruz Grading Plan Review Discount Tire Center - Auto Service Repair Major Use TRANSMITTAL DATE: December 14, 2009 COMMENTS: 1. Zoning has reviewed the grading plan for compliance with the site plan. The architectural site plan has not been approved by all PDSD reviewers. 2. Zoning cannot approve the grading plans until the all PDSD Plans Reviewers approve the site plan and the approved and stamped site plan is available and included with the grading plan package. Zoning will re-review the grading plans on the next submittal and compare them to the approved site plan if available. 3. Please ensure that any changes made to the Architectural Site plan are made to the grading plan and visa versa. 4. Zoning will re-review the grading plan on the next submittal to ensure compliance due to changes that may be made to the plans due to review comments. If you have any questions about this transmittal, please call David Rivera, (520) 791-5608. RESUBMITTAL OF THE FOLLOWING IS REQUIRED: Revised grading plans. |
| 12/14/2009 | ANDREW CONNOR | NPPO | REVIEW | Denied | 1. All landscape areas will be depressed to accept water flow from roofs, PAAL, and parking areas. Show by detail or spot elevations on the grading plan how landscape areas will accommodate water harvesting. 2. Ensure that all Engineering comments and concerns are addressed prior to NPP / Landscape approval. |
Final Status
| Task End Date | Reviewer's Name | Type of Review | Description |
|---|---|---|---|
| 01/11/2010 | CPIERCE1 | OUT TO CUSTOMER | Completed |
| 01/11/2010 | SUE REEVES | REJECT SHELF | Completed |