Microfiche records prior to 2006 have not been completely digitized and may not be available yet on PRO. If you can not find what you are looking for please submit a records request.
Permit Review Detail
Review Status: Completed
Review Details: GRADING
Permit Number - T09BU01718
Review Name: GRADING
Review Status: Completed
| Review Date | Reviewer's Name | Type of Review | Description | Status | Comments |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 11/30/2009 | ANDREW CONNOR | NPPO | REVIEW | Denied | Add the following notes to the site / grading, and NPP plan(s) (Including heading): CITY OF TUCSON DEVELOPMENT STANDARD NO. 9-04.0 HILLSIDE DEVELOPMENT SITE IMPROVEMENT A. Vegetation Retention. 1. Existing trees with four (4) inch or greater trunk diameter and cacti will be preserved in their original locations, except for building sites and access and utilities serving building sites. 2. When retention of the above trees and cacti in their original locations is not possible due to building site location, the trees and cacti will be salvaged and replanted in areas requiring re-vegetation, whenever possible. B. Re-vegetation. All cut or fill slopes, which are no steeper than three (3:1) and all utility trenches or septic leaching fields which are not located in parking or driveway areas will be re-vegetated in compliance with the following requirements. 1. All plants used in re-vegetation must be the same as the native vegetation on the site or any adjacent site prior to grading or clearing. 2. Re-vegetation will be accomplished with the following minimum requirements for plants. a. Native trees, a minimum of fifteen (15) gallon size with a minimum trunk diameter of two (2) inches measured at the soil level, or large specimen cactus will be placed at the same vegetation density found on the site prior to any clearing, grubbing, or grading. b. Seeds for trees, desert shrubs, and grasses will be planted with a density adequate to control erosion and may use one of the following methods of planting or any other method approved by the Zoning Review Section at DSD. 1) Raked into the soil with appropriate mulch materials; 2) Hydro-seeding; 3) Anchored mulches; or 4) Established on jute, rolled straw, or similar material. C. A temporary watering system must be installed until the re-vegetation materials is established. D. NPPO pre permit inspection is required prior to grading inspection can be scheduled by calling IVR system and entering inspection code 09015 or calling Landscape Field Representative directly @ 837-4950 Ensure that all Engineering comments and concerns are addressed prior to landscape / NPP approval. |
| 12/02/2009 | MICHAEL ST. PAUL | ZONING | REVIEW | Denied | December 4, 2009 Development Services Department Zoning Review Section Michael St.Paul Planning Technician T09BU01718 Grading Plans for T09CM03032 Comments: 1. The grading plan has been reviewed by Zoning Review Section but cannot approve the plan until it has been approved by the Engineering, and Landscape Review Sections and until all zoning comments or concerns have been addressed. 2. We cannot verify that the grading plan is in compliance with an approved site plan for this site. Please provide one copy of the stamped approved site plan with your next submittal. 3. Zoning will re-review the grading plan on the next submittal to ensure compliance with the approved site plan. Additional comments may be forthcoming. See comments relative to conditional approval of the plot plan and the encroachment into the ERZ. |
| 12/22/2009 | ELIZABETH LEIBOLD | ENGINEERING | REVIEW | Denied | DATE: December 22, 2009 TO: Greg Carlson, PE SUBJECT: 3362 W LOST STARR PL Site, Pool, & Grading Plan Review LOCATION: Lot 5 Wildcat Pass REVIEWER: Elizabeth Leibold ACTIVITY NUMBER: T09CM03032, T09BU01718, T09BU01741 Summary: Engineering Division has reviewed the site and grading plan portion of the submittal package and does not recommend approval at this time. Address the following comments for resubmittal. SITE PLAN COMMENTS: The following 7 comments are from the 10DEC09 T09CM03032 comments and shall be addressed for the site plan: 1) DS Sec.3-01.4.4.B: Revise cross section and/or provide the following additional cross sections for clarification to provide and label the Final Plat EHSB line on planviews and in section details. Add note to plans that EHSB was determined by engineer to be at 100-year floodplain limit per drainage report etc. 2) Show Final Plat floodplain limits per plat on planview and label both sets of floodplain delineations. 3) Per General Note 11 on the Final Plat, a floodplain use permit is required for this lot. Submit application for Floodplain Use Permit with next submittal. 4) DS Sec.11-01.4.1.C.3: Delineate disturbance limits to show as including utilities and the limits need to provide for sufficient space for grading construction. It may be necessary to indicate heavy duty construction fence to restrict construction activity along the side yard grading limit boundaries. 5) Indicate grade break location and elevation on plan view for interceptor swale at top of north cut slope near concrete bench. 6) Provide a few additional proposed spot elevations in rear of yard north of kitchen to indicate positive drainage away from foundation and toward drainage focal points. Clarify any stair elevations. 7) DS Sec.11-01.4.1.C: Address the following General Notes comments: a) Add reference to the City of Tucson Development Standards 11-01 for grading standards. b) Add that the project will comply with City of Tucson Land Use Code Sections 2.8.1 Hillside Development Zone (HDZ). c) DS Sec.11-01.4.1.C: Add note that rip rap slopes shall have handplaced rip rap with filter fabric per HDZ requirements. POOL COMMENTS: 8) None. GRADING PLAN COMMENTS: 9) Address the following grading comments on grading planview sheet 2: a) Show swale continuation from north of garage area to the driveway pipes, labeling spot elevations for swale invert to show positive gradient along swale and to minimize potential for runoff to be directed toward structure. b) Add note to grading plan that geotechnical engineering field reports and final geotechnical engineering conformance letter are required prior to final grading approval. c) Add note or show on planview the 3 percent for 5 feet minimum grade per geotechnical report for slopes around perimeter of structure. d) For the area at the rear of yard north of kitchen, patio drain will be assumed to be clogged since there are no secondary pipe systems. Explain and show how ponding will not occur in this area. e) Address comments 4-7 above for grading plan as well. 10) Assure all Final Plat data within lot boundary with affected easements, is shown on plans, including distance for L280 per plat. 11) For resubmittal, provide 2 copies of the revised Site & Grading Plan sheets and any other supporting documents, with a response letter. I can be reached at 837-4934 if you have questions or would like to set up a meeting to go over resubmittal. Elizabeth Leibold, PE Civil Engineer Engineering Division Planning & Development Services Department |
Final Status
| Task End Date | Reviewer's Name | Type of Review | Description |
|---|---|---|---|
| 01/07/2010 | DELMA ROBEY | OUT TO CUSTOMER | Completed |
| 01/07/2010 | SUE REEVES | REJECT SHELF | Completed |