Microfiche records prior to 2006 have not been completely digitized and may not be available yet on PRO. If you can not find what you are looking for please submit a records request.
Permit Review Detail
Review Status: Completed
Review Details: RESUBMITTAL - GRADING ALL
Permit Number - T09BU01716
Review Name: RESUBMITTAL - GRADING ALL
Review Status: Completed
| Review Date | Reviewer's Name | Type of Review | Description | Status | Comments |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 01/27/2010 | BIANCA RAMIREZ | ENGINEERING | REVIEW | Denied | DATE: January 22, 2010 SUBJECT: Grading TO: Peter Salonga LOCATION: 4280 N 1st Ave, T13S, R14E, Section 19, Ward 3 REVIEWERS: Bianca Ramirez, CFM ACTIVITY: T09BU01716 (Third Review) RESUBMITTAL REQUIRED: Grading Plan, Drainage Statement and Geotechnical Report. SUMMARY: Engineering Division of Development Services Department is unable to complete review of the proposed grading plan for the above referenced property. Engineering Division is requesting that copy of approved tentative plat and/or development plan be submitted prior to any further review. Please submit requested supplementary documentation accordingly and resubmit for full review. Grading Plan: Denied 1. Complied 2. Complied 3. Complied 4. Complied 5. Complied 6. Complied 7. Complied 8. Complied 9. Complied 10. In drainage statement provide discussion and explanation of pre-development and post-development flows for existing pipe that crosses site and appears to be exit into northern property. If there is an increase in flows authorization from off site property owner may be required. Response: Discussion with Laith - Previous development plan addressses drainage. 11. Complied. 12. Complied 13. Standard Note: A permit or a private improvement agreement will be necessary for any work performed within the Right-of-way. Contact Permits and Codes at (520) 791-5100 for permit information. 14. Complied 15. Complied 16. Complied 17. Complied 18. Complied 19. Complied 20. Complied 21. Provide limits of 100-year floodplain limits on grading plan. Regulatory flow indicated within 1st Ave, therefore it is important that the floodplain limits are determined in the report and indicated on the plan, if the floodplain is on site. Floodplain limits along with pertinent information should be added to the plan, such as the water surface elevations and associated cross sections. Please ensure that cross section is provided along the upstream side of proposed building. Response: Provide ponding limits on site plan to reflect ponding exhitbits per drainage report. 22. Complied 23. Complied 24. Complied 25. Complied 26. Complied 27. Revise north arrow to show correct direction of north. 28. Additional comments may be forthcoming. Drainage Statement: Denied 1. Please include a response letter to the comments along with the corrected copies of the Drainage Statement. 2. A Hydrology report is required for parcels affected by 100 year flows of 100 cfs, of more per S.M.D.D.F.M., chap. II, 2.1.2, therefore the drainage statement is not acceptable. Flows along First Avenue are indicating flows of 300 cfs. Response: Site plan is indicating flows of 743 cfs floodplain limits need to be identified separate from FEMA Zone X designation. Since flows are greater than 100 cfs the flows are jurisdictional and subject to the requirements as described. Respose: Meeting with Laith clarifies that reduced drainage discharge is due to detention. 3. Complied 4. In drainage statement provide discussion and explanation of pre-development and post-development flows for existing pipe that crosses site and appears to be exit into northern property. If there is an increase in flows authorization from off site property owner may be required. Notarized documentation will be needed to direct flows into neighboring property. Authorization to do so will be required prior to approval. Response: In addition to comment 4, provide discussion in report indicating where outlet of the existing pipe is located and include ownership. Response: Discussion with Laith clarifies that pipe is existing. If this is not true please clarify. 5. Finshed Floor is estabished per drainage report. Therefore, Floodplain Use Permit will be required. 5. Additional comments may be forthcoming. Geotechnical Report: Approved If you have any questions, please contact me at bianca.ramirez@tucsonaz.gov or 520-837-4928. Bianca Ramirez, CFM Engineering Associate City of Tucson - Planning and Development Services Engineering Department |
| 01/28/2010 | ANDREW CONNOR | NPPO | REVIEW | Approv-Cond | Ensure that all Engineering comments and concerns are addressed prior NPP / Landscape approval stamp. |
| 02/05/2010 | MICHAEL ST. PAUL | ZONING | REVIEW | Approv-Cond | Engineering approval required. |
Final Status
| Task End Date | Reviewer's Name | Type of Review | Description |
|---|---|---|---|
| 02/09/2010 | CPIERCE1 | OUT TO CUSTOMER | Completed |
| 02/09/2010 | SUE REEVES | REJECT SHELF | Completed |