Permit Review Detail
Review Status: Completed
Review Details: RESUBMITTAL - GRADING ALL
Permit Number - T09BU01581
Review Name: RESUBMITTAL - GRADING ALL
Review Status: Completed
| Review Date | Reviewer's Name | Type of Review | Description | Status | Comments |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 01/05/2010 | ANDREW CONNOR | NPPO | REVIEW | Denied | Ensure that all Engineering comments and concerns are addressed prior to Landscape / NPPO approval. |
| 12/23/2009 | MICHAEL ST. PAUL | ZONING | REVIEW | Denied | December 23, 2009 Development Services Department Zoning Review Section Michael St.Paul Planning Technician T09BU01581 Grading Plans for T09CM02829 2525 N. Jackrabbit Ave. Comments: 1. The grading plan has been reviewed by Zoning Review Section but cannot approve the plan until it has been approved by the Engineering, and Landscape Review Sections and until all zoning comments or concerns have been addressed. 2. We cannot verify that the grading plan is in compliance with an approved site plan for this site. Please provide one copy of the stamped approved site plan with your next submittal. 3. Zoning will re-review the grading plan on the next submittal to ensure compliance with the approved site plan. Additional comments may be forthcoming. |
| 12/24/2009 | JASON GREEN | ENGINEERING | REVIEW | Denied | DATE: December 24, 2009 SUBJECT: 2525 N Jackrabbit Ave- 2nd Engineering Review TO: George Lance LOCATION: T13S R13E Sec34 Ward 1 REVIEWERS: Jason Green, CFM ACTIVITY: T09CM02829 (Site Plan), T09BU01581 (Grading Plan), and T09OT02314 (Floodplain Use Permit) SUMMARY: Engineering Division of Planning Development Services Department has received and reviewed the revised site plan (T09CM02829), grading plan (T09BU01581), Floodplain Use Permit (T09OT02314) and Drainage Report exhibits (JE Fuller Hydrology and Geomorphology, Inc., 30NOV09) for the above referenced property. Engineering Division does not recommend approval of the site plan or grading plan at this time. The following items need to be addressed: DRAINAGE REPORT COMMENTS: 1) Complied. SITE PLAN COMMENTS: 2) Complied. 3) DS Sec.2-02.2.1.A.5: Clarify the proposed lot lines as shown on the site plan. Per the last recorded Assessor map the property is 2 separate parcels and per the site plan there are proposed improvements crossing the property boundaries, clarify. Verify if the Zoning Section will require a lot combination prior to site plan approval for any proposed improvements offsite (i.e. portion of the basin construction, 2 shot chip seal, fencing, etc. at 2525 N Jackrabbit Ave). Documentation was not submitted showing what conditions were required from the meeting held with PDSD Administration. 4) Complied. 5) DS Sec.2-02.2.1.A.10: Revise the site plan (plan view) to correctly label the dimensions for the near and far side. Plan view has the labeling switched even though the dimensions are right. 6) Complied. 7) Complied. 8) DS Sec.2-02.2.1.A.12: Refer to comments from Ron Brown, RA Structural Plans Examiner for all onsite handicap and ANSI Standard requirements that apply to this project. 9) Complied. 10) Complied. 11) Complied. 12) Complied. 13) DS Sec2-02.2.1.A.16: Revise the site plan and grading plan sheets to correctly label and dimension the required retention basin along the west property line. Per Keynote #8 on both the site plan and grading plan this area is proposed as granite groundcover and does not correctly label the required basin per the Report, revise. 14) Complied. 15) Complied. 16) DS Sec.2-02.2.1.A.21: Provide dimensions from the street monument lines to the existing curb, driveway and utility lines. Specifically the area between the existing curb and property line must be dimensioned. 17) DS Sec.2-02.2.1.A.32: Revise the refuse details in plan view on both site plan and civil sheets to label the required bayonet anchor bolts and sleeves. 18) DS Sec.2-02.2.1.A.32: Provide written approval from Environmental Services for refuse maneuverability. Verify the maneuverability, label and dimension the required 36-foot and 50-foot radii for the refuse container; The radii shown do not accurately reflect scaled dimensions. Provide the required 14-foot by 40-foot clear approach and verify the maximum allowed back up distance for maneuverability. The refuse vehicle can not back-up into the future lot and parking area covered with 2 shot chip seal, if this area is proposed to be used for maneuverability then the area must be constructed to DS Sec.3-05 and 6-01 surfacing requirements. 19) Acknowledged. 20) Be advised that further comments may be forth coming on resubmittal of the site plan. GRADING PLAN: 21) Restated: Provide a copy of the stamped approved site plan (T09CM02829). The grading plan can not be approved until verification that all details, locations, dimensions, and plan profiles match the approved site plan. Verify all information associated with the site plan is shown on the grading plan which will be used as the construction document. 22) Complied. 23) Provide a note on the grading plan sheet to label the total acreage of the lot(s) and the disturbed acreage as proposed. The north lot has a total area of 0.4 acres and the southern lot has a total area of 0.33 acres. Clearly label the limits of grading on the civil sheets (specifically the detention/retention basin, 2 shot chip seal, fencing, etc. 24) Complied. 25) Complied. 26) Complied. 27) Complied. 28) Complied. 29) Complied. 30) Complied. 31) Acknowledged. However verification from PDSD Administration is required for any proposed uses on the adjacent lot. Otherwise both lots must be physically separated with a fence, wall, curbing or other means. 32) Complied. 33) Complied. 34) Complied. 35) Please ensure that the grading plan is consistent with the site plan and Drainage Report. Grading standards may be accessed at: http://www.ci.tucson.az.us/dsd/DevStandsTOC.pdf. FLOODPLAIN USE PERMIT COMMENTS: 36) The Floodplain Use Permit (FUP) will be conditioned and issued concurrently with the grading plan application and stamped approved plan set. All conditions related to the FUP will be based on the grading plan review. GENERAL COMMENTS: Please provide a revised site plan and grading plan that addresses the comments provided above. Include a comprehensive response letter addressing in detail responses to all of the above comments. Enclose "redlines" with the resubmittal package. Further comments may be generated upon resubmittal of the site plan and grading plan review. For questions, or to schedule an appointment, I can be reached at 837-4929. Jason Green, CFM Senior Engineer Associate Engineering Division Planning & Development Services |
Final Status
| Task End Date | Reviewer's Name | Type of Review | Description |
|---|---|---|---|
| 01/14/2010 | DELMA ROBEY | OUT TO CUSTOMER | Completed |
| 01/14/2010 | SUE REEVES | REJECT SHELF | Completed |