Permit Review Detail
Review Status: Completed
Review Details: GRADING
Permit Number - T09BU00956
Review Name: GRADING
Review Status: Completed
| Review Date | Reviewer's Name | Type of Review | Description | Status | Comments |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 07/07/2009 | STEVE SHIELDS | ZONING | REVIEW | Denied | DSD TRANSMITTAL FROM: Steve Shields Lead Planner PROJECT: Ace Charter High School T09BU00956 Grading Plan (1st Review) TRANSMITTAL DATE: July 7, 2009 1. The grading plan has been reviewed by Zoning Review Section but cannot approve the plan until it has been approved by the Engineering, and Landscape Review Sections and until all zoning comments or concerns have been addressed. 2. Zoning could not verify that the grading plan was in compliance with the approved site plan. Please submit two copies of the approved and stamped site, landscape, and NPPO plans with the next grading plan submittal. 3. Zoning will re-review the grading plan on the next submittal to insure compliance with the approved and stamped site plan. Additional comments may be forthcoming. If you have any questions about this transmittal, please contact me at Steve.Shields@tucsonaz.gov or (520) 837-4956 C:\planning\grading\t09bu00956 RESUBMITTAL OF THE FOLLOWING IS REQUIRED: Approved site plans and additional requested documents |
| 07/20/2009 | JASON GREEN | ENGINEERING | REVIEW | Denied | DATE: July 20, 2009 SUBJECT: 1915 E 36th Street Site Plan- Engineering Review TO: Philip Carhuff LOCATION: T14S R14E Sec20 Ward 5 REVIEWERS: Jason Green, CFM ACTIVITY: T09CM01666 (Site Plan) and T09BU00956 (Grading Plan) SUMMARY: Engineering Division of Development Services Department has received and reviewed the site plan (T09CM01666), grading plan (T09BU00956) and Drainage Statement (DCC, 24JUN09) for the above referenced property. Engineering Division does not recommend approval of the site plan or grading plan at this time. The following items need to be addressed: SITE PLAN COMMENTS: This project consists of a greater than 25% expansion per the Zoning Section review. The greater than 25% expansion requires that the entire site is reviewed and brought up to current full code requirements of the Development Standards and Land Use Code (this includes that all details and dimensions be shown on the proposed plan). 1) Due to the full code expansion requirement per the Zoning Section this comment letter does not reflect all of the comments or quality control comments that must be addressed prior to resubmittal of the site plan. Make sure that all dimensions, details, sections, keynotes, proposed improvements and all other aspects of this project meet the minimum requirements within DS Sec.2-02, 3-01, 3-05 and 6-01 and are reflected on the site plan sheets. 2) Revise the site plan keynotes to provide a label or reference to any proposed details. Examples include but are not limited to, keynote #6 should reference Detail 1/C2.0, keynote #9 should reference Detail 4/C2.0, etc. 3) Revise site plan keynote #20 to meet the minimum requirements within the Drainage Report for all proposed scuppers at down spout locations. Per the Drainage Report 2-Type 1 scuppers are required at all scupper locations, revise. 4) DS Sec.2-02.2.1.A.8: Provide all dimensions for the proposed back up spur as shown at the north end of the proposed parking area. Refer to DS Sec.3-05.2.2.D for minimum requirements, specifically the required 3-foot radius. 5) DS Sec.2-02.2.1.A.11: Verify and label the 25-feet radii and concrete curbs per City of Tucson Transportation Access Management Guidelines (TAMG), Section 5.5 at the driveway entrance located on 36th Street. Refer to DS Sec.3-01.3.2.C for street development standards. 6) DS Sec.2-02.2.1.A.11: Verify and label the 18-feet radii and concrete curbs per City of Tucson Transportation Access Management Guidelines (TAMG), Section 5.5 at the driveway entrance located on Kramer Ave. Refer to DS Sec.3-01.3.2.C for street development standards. 7) DS Sec.2-02.2.1.A.12: Revise the site plan to show the required 6-foot wide sidewalk with curb along the street frontage of 36th Street. Per the adopted Mayor and Counsel policy all sidewalks along MS&R right-of-ways for arterial and collector streets require 6-foot wide sidewalks. If a 4-foot sidewalk exists along the frontage of the roadway provide photo documentation showing that the existing sidewalk is in good condition. If the sidewalk is missing in spots or is cracked and buckled a new 6-foot sidewalk will be required. A DSMR will be required for modifying the development standards to allow the existing sidewalk, if less than the minimum 6-foot, to remain. 8) DS Sec.2-02.2.1.A.12: Revise the site plan to label and dimension the required 5-foot wide sidewalk with curb along the street frontage of Kramer Ave per DS Sec.3-01.3.3.A. All new development requires a new 5-foot sidewalk to be constructed within the public right-of-way. 9) DS Sec.2-02.2.1.A.12: Revise the site plan to label and dimension the required pedestrian circulation path from the existing building to the required sidewalk located along the frontage of Kramer Ave. The pedestrian circulation must meet the requirements within DS Sec.2-08. The site plan needs to clearly dimension the pedestrian circulation path and it connecting to the required 5-foot sidewalk along Kramer Ave. 10) DS Sec.2-02.2.1.A.12: Revise the site plan to show that all existing and proposed offsite handicap access ramps within the public right-of-way meet the design requirements per the public standard detail #207, if applicable. Provide details and minimum slope requirements at all transitions from pedestrian circulation to vehicular circulation. 11) DS Sec.2-02.2.1.A.12: Refer to comments from Ron Brown, RA Structural Plans Examiner for all onsite handicap and ANSI Standard requirements that apply to this project. 12) DS Sec.2-02.2.1.A.16: Clarify on the site plan and grading plan the drainage patterns for the offsite watershed that drains onto the subject parcel from the adjacent property to the south. Verify that the 10 year offsite flow event that drains across the proposed pedestrian circulation path is contained under the sidewalk. 13) DS Sec.2-02.2.1.A.19: Revise the site plan to label Kramer Ave as either public or private. 14) DS Sec.2-02.2.1.A.19: Revise the site plan to label the (½)-25-foot right-of-way for Kramer Avenue as existing. 15) DS Sec.2-02.2.1.A.19: If dedication or pedestrian improvements are not required through TDOT at this time correctly label and dimension the MS&R future sidewalk area (11-feet for a future 100-foot r-o-w), curbing, etc for 36th Ave. 16) DS Sec.2-02.2.1.A.25: Revise the site plan to label the existing light pole directly east of the proposed PAAL access point on 36th Street. Verify that the access point meets the minimum setback dimensions from both the existing light pole and power pole per Chapter 25 of the Tucson Code. 17) DS Sec.2-02.2.1.A.27: Provide a General Note stating that all fences or walls will require a separate permit for review and approval by all necessary Development Services Departments. 18) Review and approval from TDOT Permits and Codes for all improvements within the public right-of-way will be required. A right-of-way use permit application will be required prior to construction. Refer to the following links for TDOT Forms and applications: a) http://www.tucsonaz.gov/dsd/Forms_Fees___Maps/Applications/applications.html / b) http://www.dot.ci.tucson.az.us/engineering/pia.php c) Or contact Thad Harvison at 837-6592 for all additional questions regarding r-o-w. 19) Be advised that further comments may be forth coming on resubmittal of the site plan due to the full code requirement status. GRADING PLAN: 20) Provide a copy of the stamped approved site plan (T09CM01666). The grading plan can not be approved until verification that all details, locations, dimensions, and plan profiles match the approved site plan. Verify all information associated with the site plan is shown on the grading plan which will be used as the construction document. 21) Revise the grading plan sheet to clearly label the proposed gradable area for this project. Provide the grading limits in plan view on Sheet C1.2. 22) Revise the grading plan to clarify the proposed "drainage weirs" for vehicular drainage. Weirs are basin structures and do not satisfy drainage requirements for vehicular use areas. Clarify if these areas are to be curb cuts and provide a separate detail on the grading plan showing how these areas are to be constructed. 23) DS Sec.11-01.9: Revise the grading plan to dimension in plan view and within the details the required 2-foot setback from all property boundaries to the proposed limits of grading, top of fill slopes, and proposed fencing (the grading plan is required to label this clearly at all property line cross sections). Specifically the fencing and sidewalk area adjacent to the parallel parking spaces. 24) Revise grading plan sheet to meet the minimum requirements within the Drainage Report for all proposed scuppers. Per the Drainage Report 2-Type 1 scuppers are required at all scupper locations. Provide a reference to the Standard Detail or provide a separate detail in plan view showing how the scuppers are to be constructed. 25) Provide a copy of the referenced Geotechnical Report (grading note # 5) with the next submittal. 26) Provide a Grading Note to state the following: "Call for a Pre-construction meeting prior to start of earthwork. To schedule a DSD Pre-construction meeting, SWPPP inspection or general Engineering Inspections, call IVR (740-6970), or schedule with a Customer Service Representative at the Development Services Department, or contact DSD Engineering at 791-5550 extension 2101, or schedule inspections online at: http://www.ci.tucson.az.us/dsd/Online_Services/Online_Permits/online_permits.html 27) DS Sec.11-01: Revise grading note #1 specifying conformance with City of Tucson Development Standard 11-01.0 (excavation and grading requirements). 28) Provide a general grading note stating that "All proposed fencing and walls will require a separate permit for review and approval by all necessary Development Services Departments." GENERAL COMMENTS: Please provide a revised site plan and grading that addresses the comments provided above. Include a comprehensive response letter addressing in detail responses to all of the above comments. Enclose "redlines" with the resubmittal package. Further comments may be generated upon resubmittal of the site plan and grading plan review. For questions, or to schedule an appointment, I can be reached at 837-4929. Jason Green, CFM Senior Engineer Associate Engineering Division COT Development Services |
| 07/21/2009 | JOE LINVILLE | NPPO | REVIEW | Denied | See applicable comments under Landscape review for T09BU00956. |
Final Status
| Task End Date | Reviewer's Name | Type of Review | Description |
|---|---|---|---|
| 07/22/2009 | CINDY AGUILAR | OUT TO CUSTOMER | Completed |